Вчера Таганский суд Москвы вынес приговор по второму уголовному делу в отношении Михаила Абызова по ч.4 ст.159 УК РФ. Ему назначено 6,5 лет лишения свободы. Абызов уже отбывает наказание по делу о создании преступного сообщества. Путем сложения приговоров ему назначено 14 лет в колонии строгого режима.@BlackAudit

Channel
BlackAudit
@BlackAudit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
52,361subscribers
+256 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001101703899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BlackAudit |
| Description | Финансы. Экономика. Экономическая Безопасность. Налоги. Схемы. Практика. Поделиться информацией и связь строго сюда - [email protected] |
| Created | 9 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BlackAudit |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 15:06 | 52,361 | +9 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 11:57 | 52,352 | -7 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 20:21 | 52,359 | -6 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:11 | 52,365 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:58 | 52,370 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:10 | 52,379 | -7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:56 | 52,386 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:07 | 52,391 | +7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:38 | 52,384 | +16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:09 | 52,368 | +15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:49 | 52,353 | +253 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 52,100 | -22 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:21 | 52,122 | -14 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:30 | 52,136 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:14 | 52,146 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:08 | 52,148 | -6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:44 | 52,154 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 52,153 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:04 | 52,166 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 52,169 | first reading |
Engagement
616 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 203 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.5%
- avg views ÷ 52,361 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,600
- 188 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 188
- of 616 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 616 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,428,340 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 255
- Videos
- 101
- Links
- 612
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 27m 51s
- Average length
- 1m 59s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 42
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 10
- of 614 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 13
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BlackAudit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 616 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 188 posts held from the last 30 days (4.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
За девять месяцев 2026 года закрылось 208,5 тысяч организаций. При этом новых компаний зарегистрировано почти в два раза меньше - 109 тысяч. Причины не изменились: высокие расходы, дорогие кредиты и усиление налогового контроля. При этом растущие расходы компаний переложить на конечного потребителя крайне проблематично из-за конкуренции и пониженного спроса.@BlackAudit
Для физлиц будет свой аналог ЗСК. «Зараженный» не сможет отправлять средства, а если и отправит следующий будет тоже «заражен». По простому будет просто блок, вне зависимости банка.@BlackAudit
Ходят слухи, что Москва Сити пустеет - криптовалютные барыги съезжают в более «безопасные» места. Но для них безопасных мест не остается, потому что облавы на них скоро начнутся серьёзные.@BlackAudit
1500 налогоплательщиков, которые использовали «бумажный НДС», выявлено в Новосибирской области. Недоплата в бюджет составила порядка 3 млрд руб. 700 налогоплательщиков добровольно заплатили НДС. Также выявлено 35 исполнителей госконтрактов, которые покупали НДС. И никак не понимают коммерсы, что эра «бумажного НДС» ушла, до сих пор пытаются найти, где купить.@BlackAudit
В Турции пресечена схема отмывания денег через прямые эфиры в TikTok. Суть такая: прямые эфиры со всякой чушью стали мощным источником доходов за счет виртуальных подарков, которые отправляли зрители. Подозреваемые отправляли популярным блогерам, ведущим прямые эфиры, виртуальные подарки высокой стоимости под видом пожертвований. Блогеры конвертировали эти подарки в наличные деньги, а после вычета комиссии TikTok воз…
В Казахстане с 20 ноября 2026 года вступят в силу обновлённые правила задержания наличных денег и денежных инструментов при пересечении таможенной границы ЕАЭС. Расширен перечень госорганов, информация от которых будет основанием для приостановления перемещения денег. Основанием для задержания могут стать сведения о возможном незаконном происхождении денежных средств или их предполагаемом использовании в противоправн…
Очередной антидроп-законопроект, который выйдет боком законопослушным гражданам: ограничение 30 тыс руб в месяц для пополнения банковских счетов в случае подозрительной операции. Лимит не только на внесение наличии, но и на переводы от других людей. Срок ограничения до 1 года.@BlackAudit
В США раскрыли мошенническую схему. Преступник подделывали голоса и внешность руководителей с помощью ИИ, чтобы выманить деньги. Длилось это 2 года. Ущерб более $129 млн. Звонки совершались бухгалтерам и финансовым менеджерам, рассказывалось о конфиденциальных финансовых операциях. Деньги переводились на счета сообщников в Австрии, Китае, Греции, Португалии, Сингапуре, Словакии, Испании, ОАЭ и США, а затем конвертиро…
Предприниматель Артем Тунин получил 4 года общего режима по делу об организации нелегальной платежной системы KiberPay, которая помогала нелегальным онлайн-казино, брокерским компаниям и forex-дилерам обналичивать средства. Сайт выполнял все функции платёжной системы: приём, выдачу, перевод денежных средств. При оплате система выдавала номер карты дропа, деньги снимались через банкомат, передавались организаторам, ко…
ПСБ подал заявление о признании банкротом основателя крупнейшей российской майнинговой компании BitRiver Игоря Рунца. Сумма требований более 770 млн руб.@BlackAudit
Серьезное увеличение штрафов по 30 статьям УК в сфере экономики рекомендовал принять Комитет Госдумы по уголовному и административному законодательству. Незаконное предпринимательство - с 300 тыс руб до 1,5 млн руб, а если организованная группа - до 2,5 млн руб. Экономическое мошенничество. В сфере предпринимательства со значительным ущербом до 500 тыс руб, крупные убытки - до 800 тыс руб. Сокрытие имущества при банк…
Showing the 12 most recent of 616 posts we hold for @BlackAudit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@BlackAudit edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 20 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 20 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @BlackAudit as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 21 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 46 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Откатят ли налоговую реформу (НДС 20% и т д)?
- Да16%
- Нет84%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Планируете ли вы использовать цифровой рубль?
- Да16%
- Нет85%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 616 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@bankrustg · 1175 postsБумажная Zмея
@bumaznayaZmeya · 8,9263 postsВЭД платежи в Азию и не только.
@VEDpathway · 6,7932 postsИнфотонна https://t.me/InfoTonna Независимый канал думающих людей.
@InfoTonna · 4661 postБелый дым
@WeiserRauch · 271 postBlack Lawyer Consulting LLC
@blacklawyerconsulting · 41 postLAVA 5+ SMM PR
@lavagency · 91 postФеодальный вестник
@salus_populi · 21 postТасманский дьявол
@tasmanian_diablo · 14,5831 postThe Bread Boom
@thebreadb · 551 postВЭД. Мошенники. Черный список участников ВЭД рынка
@ved_black_list · 8671 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@bankrustg · 1175 postsБумажная Zмея
@bumaznayaZmeya · 8,9264 postsДоктор Z прописал
@docpro · 142,0724 postsТасманский дьявол
@tasmanian_diablo · 14,5833 postsCrypto Family
@xcryptofamily · 8973 postsArchitecton AI🦄
@architecton_tech · 1,821,7492 postsОколофинтех
@nearfintech · 92 postsВЧК-ОГПУ
@rucriminalinfo_2 · 210,0042 postsВЭД платежи в Азию и не только.
@VEDpathway · 6,7932 postsРаньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,2021 postBlack Lawyer Consulting LLC
@blacklawyerconsulting · 41 postДУМАем Z
@dumayem · 19,3191 postИнфотонна https://t.me/InfoTonna Независимый канал думающих людей.
@InfoTonna · 4661 post⛷ КомиАССР
@komiassr · 2061 postLAVA 5+ SMM PR
@lavagency · 91 postФилософия Krip_T0N’a
@philoton · 161 post10000 ЧАТОВ ДЛЯ ПИАРА | ПИАРЩИК | АДМИНСКИЕ ЧАТЫ | ВЗАИМНЫЙ ПИАР | ПИАР ЧАТЫ | PR | VP | PIAR | DIAMOND
@pro100pr · 4141 postReadovka
@readovkanews · 2,015,4191 postФеодальный вестник
@salus_populi · 21 postThe Bread Boom
@thebreadb · 551 postВЧК-ОГПУ
@vchk_ogpu · 24,3901 postВЭД. Мошенники. Черный список участников ВЭД рынка
@ved_black_list · 8671 postWin-Win
@victorstepanych · 155,1221 postБелый дым
@WeiserRauch · 271 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@boilerroomchannel · 224,631#1
@offshorechannel · 11,236#2
@finkrolik · 118,622#3
@banksta · 439,852#4
@ejdailyru · 663,755#5
@bbbreaking · 1,975,202#6
@mash · 3,140,033#7
@bankrollo · 462,111#8
@markettwits · 341,184#9
@trubapodneglinnoy · 137,377#10
@russicaru · 420,007#11
@LexagencyLawStream · 30,038#12
@rbc_news · 912,968#13
@proimport · 52,980#14
@infantmilitario · 275,861#15
@bloodysx · 1,172,481#16
@ateobreaking · 742,328#17
@moscowmap · 2,620,198#18
@victorstepanych · 155,122#19
@meduzalive · 1,116,618#20
@tot115fz · 26,655#21
@obrazbuduschego2 · 163,839#22
@exploitex · 2,021,350#23
@dimsmirnov175 · 330,919#24
@brieflyru · 100,388#25
@forbesrussia · 235,524#26
@DeCenter · 1,640,924#27
@banki_oil · 543,702#28
@criminalru · 117,172#29
@legitimniy · 1,036,538#30
@ru2ch · 710,370#31
@economika · 146,486#32
@bitkogan · 257,213#33
@temalebedev · 971,105#34
@BitLenta · 12,947#35
@bankoffo · 199,358#36
@nonetutto · 142,478#37
@cbrstocks · 117,223#38
@forklog · 101,350#39
@MarketOverview · 46,365#40
@karaulny_accountant · 94,644#41
@headlines_for_traders · 114,606#42
@kommersant · 295,459#43
@stalin_gulag · 297,712#44
@spydell_finance · 131,111#45
@juhovitskiy · 47,851#46
@finpizdec · 54,350#47
@financial_trends · 11#48
@crypto_hd · 131,689#49
@RBCCrypto · 131,891#50
@viktor_pershikov · 9,889#51
@russianmacro · 101,960#52
@sncmag · 299,576#53
@imnotbozhena · 503,516#54
@vcnews · 112,144#55
@nebrexnya · 118,442#56
@AK47pfl · 114,402#57
@thebell_io · 105,097#58
@sale_caviar · 192,570#59
@economica · 1,619,026#60
@proeconomics · 68,791#61
@bitkogan_hotline · 82,741#62
@bazabazon · 1,556,528#63
@asupersharij · 1,736,455#64
@boris_rozhin · 750,635#65
@yurasumy · 2,661,091#66
@mig41 · 476,345#67
@dvachannel · 969,125#68
@rezident_ua · 962,361#69
@shot_shot · 1,265,529#70
@politjoystic · 250,558#71
@bomber_fighter · 525,130#72
@luka_ebkov · 428,911#73
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,101#74
@readovkanews · 2,015,419#75
@dva_majors · 1,161,502#76
@apwagner · 313,158#77
@zerada1 · 423,348#78
@vysokygovorit · 484,806#79
@mediap2p · 89,113#80
@auantonov · 321,546#81
@platshit · 12,280#82
@whackdoor · 1,535,262#83
@fsb_boutique · 34,540#84
@milinfolive · 614,555#85
@medvedev_telegram · 1,688,200#86
@d_code · 405,458#87
@wargonzo · 737,693#88
@minaevlife · 317,610#89
@voenacher · 658,288#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vklader · 19,599
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
@tot115fz · 26,655
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
@mendeleevshina · 24,162
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
@mislinemisli · 154,820
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
@FizAndYur · 30,403
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
@FinTechExchange1 · 26,318
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 17 September 2026
@karaulny_accountant · 94,644
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@proimport · 52,980
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@LexagencyLawStream · 30,038
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
@trubapodneglinnoy · 137,377
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@scamersant · 18,736
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 5 October 2026
@anon_prok · 38,101
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
@finlock · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
@KotElviry · 48,180
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
@LisaBasilioCh · 45,750
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@oooavirta · 55,905
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@redbinder · 192,197
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
@globalpass · 19,586
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 September 2026
@mytar_rf · 27,341
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
@criminalru · 117,172
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
@nebrexnya · 118,442
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
@persontaxes · 31,358
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@accwhisper · 50,493
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
@cyber_cabb · 81,780
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BlackAudit” (@BlackAudit), 52,361 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BlackAudit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.