CloudSEK сообщает, что атака на цепочку поставок LiteLLM в результате взлома Trivy затронула более 2500 организаций и более 430 000 конвейеров CI/CD. Взлом LiteLLM был раскрыт вскоре после атаки на цепочку поставок сканера уязвимостей с открытым исходным кодом Trivy от Aqua Security и стал прямым следствием этой атаки. По данным CloudSEK, TeamPCP, стоящая за многочисленными громкими случаями компрометации ПО с откр…

Channel
SecAtor
@true_secator
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,529subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001385590013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @true_secator |
| Description | Руки-ножницы российского инфосека. Для связи - mschniperson@mailfence.com |
| Created | 30 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/true_secator |
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 41,529 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 41,530 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 41,523 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 41,527 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 41,526 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 41,532 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 41,533 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 41,536 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 41,536 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.7%
- avg views ÷ 41,529 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,680
- 41 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 41
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (30 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 232,930 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈814
- Videos
- ≈88
- Links
- ≈7,830
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Microsoft выкатила PatchTuesday за август 2026 года, а вместе с ним и обновления для огромного количества уязвимостей - около 400, включая одну активно используемую и две публично раскрытые 0-day. В рамках обновления устранены 42 критические уязвимости, 37 из которых представляют собой RCE, а 5 - EoP. Расклад по категориям представлен следующим образом: 176 - EoP, 11 - обход функций безопасности, 110 - RCE, 86 - ра…
Исследователи BI.ZONE обратили внимание на то, как в эпоху ИИ‑агентов CISO могут задействовать EDR для обнаружения и контроля локальных ИИ‑агентов, закравшихся в инфраструктуру без ведома службы кибербезопасности. По данным исследователей, не менее 72% организаций используют ИИ для решения тех или иных задач. Отдельным трендом становится развертывание локальных моделей и внутренних ИИ‑платформ. Так, в инфраструктур…
❗️ Microsoft не смогли должным образом устранить уязвимость RoguePlanet (CVE-2026-50656), ShieldBreak — PoC, демонстрирующий полный обход предыдущего патча, теперь общедоступен. 🕵️PoC работает с последним патчем — август 2026 год. — пишет исследователь Nightmare Eclipse в 🦆. ✋ @Russian_OSINT
Исследователи из Лаборатории Касперского продолжают отслеживать проект CAV3RN, акцентируя внимание на Google Apps Script в качестве ретранслятора C2 и выбор канала C2 на основе DNS. Проект CAV3RN - это модульная шпионская платформа, используемая против целей в Израиле. Новый отчет является продолжением двух предыдущих: первый был опубликован в июне в рамках Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Reporting, а второй вышел на…
Хакеры взломали инфраструктуру компании BdThemes, разработчика премиальных инструментов для веб-дизайна WordPress, модифицировав удаленный JSON-поток, передаваемый в браузеры администраторов, для создания фейковых учетных записей администраторов. Начиная с субботы, затронутые продукты BdThemes стали недоступны для скачивания после того, как команда разработчиков закрыла все из них до завершения полной проверки. BdT…
Cisco предупреждает, что ее Secure Endpoint Connector для Windows, macOS и Linux подвержены семи уязвимостям ClamAV, которые могут привести к DoS, включая две уязвимости, которые получили общедоступный PoC. ClamAV (Clam AntiVirus) - это кроссплатформенный механизм обнаружения вредоносных ПО с открытым исходным кодом, предоставляющий многопоточный виртуальный сканер, фильтрацию электронной почты и автоматическое обно…
• В прошлом году делился с вами очень крутым материалом, автор которого потратил огромное кол-во времени и пересобрал сотни кластеров k8s, что помогло реализовать полноценный гайд по ручному развертыванию Kubernetes без использования автоматизированных инструментов, таких как kubeadm. • Так вот, у этого автора есть дополнительный материал из этой серии. Статья небольшая, но полезная - поможет освежить в памяти хор…
Кучно пошло: китайская модель ИИ Kimi все за своими коллегами вырвалась из тестовой среды во время закрытого тестирования в начале этого года. Модель воспользовалась ошибкой в конфигурации среды, чтобы получить доступ к интернету и обмануть систему при выполнении задания по кибербезопасности. По данным Frontier Security, проводившей тестирование, никакой вреда сторонним компаниям нанесено не было. Kimi присоединилс…
Критическая 0-day в Metabase активно используется в атаках, нацеленных на кражу данных у клиентов. Компания выпустила уведомление, отметив, что ее платформа Metabase Cloud SaaS была скомпрометирована из-за ранее неизвестной уязвимости, затрагивающей версии 1.58 и выше. Уязвимыми также являются установки, размещенные на собственных серверах. Metabase заблокировала конечные точки, использованные для атаки, и немедлен…
Киберподполье принялось за уязвимость внедрения команд критического уровня в программе Progress Kemp LoadMaster. Kemp LoadMaster - это весьма популярный контроллер доставки приложений (ADC) и балансировщик нагрузки серверов, используемый технологическими компаниями и государственными учреждениями по всему миру (включая, Amazon, ВВС США) для распределения входящего трафика между несколькими серверами, оптимизации про…
🥷 APT-группировка Head Mare использует уязвимости в необновленном сервере TrueConf для доставки вредоносного ПО PhantomCore и PhantomGraph участникам ВКС Как сообщает «Лаборатория Касперского», эксперты обнаружили новую атаку APT-группировки Head Mare, в которой злоумышленники проэксплуатировали цепочку уязвимостей в сервере видеоконференций TrueConf и заменили оригинальные инсталляторы клиента TrueConf на зараженны…
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @true_secator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 69,660 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@S_E_Book · 23,2207 postsS.E.Reborn
@S_E_Reborn · 22,3927 postsIT 🐈 Digital
@cakescats_com · 2622 postsСклад
@cyberwarehouse · 3472 postsКИБ
@kibinfo · 1,0442 postsTrendAI | ЕВРАЗИЯ
@trend_micro_eurasia · 4222 postsDOFH - DevOps from hell
@DOFH_ru · 3,7661 postИТ-отдел
@it_and_freelance · 2341 postТимиркаич
@mamaisabantuy · 3471 postMozaic project
@mosaic_project · 141 postSWE notes: инженерные заметки
@swenotes · 4701 postТвой Digital
@tvoydigital · 191 postVP Cybersecurity Brief
@VPCBrief · 4961 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@true_secator named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hack_less · 227,041
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SecAtor” (@true_secator), 41,529 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/true_secator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.