прикинь на тебя такая хуйня с автоматом побежит
custom 5226635265455433220793custom 5305417790436417835303🤣166custom 527649956517905477257😱27🤮20😁10🍓9

Channel
@sashakon
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
132,976subscribers
+2,542 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001122103071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sashakon |
| Description | Заходи, присаживайся. Я тебе сейчас всё расскажу. @evfidripiy - реклама РКН: 5161466921 2200 7007 0983 6810 - переводите сюда свои деньги, чтобы автор окончательно спился Подписаться на закрытый канал: https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=sOp |
| Created | 2 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sashakon |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 02:56 | 132,976 | +136 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 02:19 | 132,840 | -13 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 19:57 | 132,853 | -52 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 16:06 | 132,905 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:40 | 132,906 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:40 | 132,909 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:08 | 132,905 | +73 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:29 | 132,832 | +116 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:26 | 132,716 | +195 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:41 | 132,521 | -22 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:21 | 132,543 | +23 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:49 | 132,520 | +32 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 132,488 | +13 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 132,475 | +46 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:45 | 132,429 | +23 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 132,406 | -40 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:00 | 132,446 | +16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:26 | 132,430 | -16 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 132,446 | +16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:37 | 132,430 | first reading |
384 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 204 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 384 (30 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 8,090,600 |
| Reactions total | 580,718 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 19:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,712,042 reactions across 379 posts, in 74 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 819,584 | 47.9% | |
| custom 5305417790436417835 | 211,074 | 12.3% | |
| custom 5226635265455433220 | 154,936 | 9.05% | |
| 💯 | 143,628 | 8.39% | |
| custom 5301161263097717140 | 127,730 | 7.46% | |
| custom 5294367724347073084 | 68,802 | 4.02% | |
| 🔥 | 46,939 | 2.74% | |
| 😁 | 38,855 | 2.27% | |
| ❤ | 25,336 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5276499565179054772 | 16,220 | 0.947% | |
| 👍 | 12,669 | 0.74% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6,102 | 0.356% | |
| 🫡 | 5,476 | 0.32% | |
| 😢 | 4,223 | 0.247% | |
| 💩 | 4,019 | 0.235% | |
| 🕊 | 3,715 | 0.217% | |
| 🎃 | 3,160 | 0.185% | |
| 🦄 | 2,620 | 0.153% | |
| 🖕 | 1,310 | 0.077% | |
| 🤡 | 1,291 | 0.075% | |
| 54 further kinds | 14,353 | 0.838% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 384 of the 384 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,732,018 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 384 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sashakon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 384 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 29 of 137 posts held from the last 30 days (21.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
прикинь на тебя такая хуйня с автоматом побежит
custom 5226635265455433220793custom 5305417790436417835303🤣166custom 527649956517905477257😱27🤮20😁10🍓9
вот за что я уважаю Дженсена Хуанга - у него явно нет ни типажа, ни девиаций. никаких школьниц, никаких суперпрокачанных тетенек. мужик просто ЛЮБИТ ЕБАТЬ СИМПАТИЧНЫХ ЖЕНЩИН ХУЕМ В ПИЗДУ. в двадцать первом веке одно это требует уважения. красава, Дженсен Хуанг.
🔥2,000😁583❤205💯156custom 5305417790436417835105👍49custom 522663526545543322045custom 530116126309771714022
написал Куваев, предложил выебать Масяню в реале
🤣2,020custom 5226635265455433220405custom 5305417790436417835240custom 529436772434707308468🌭23custom 527649956517905477220🍌18custom 530116126309771714010
если Куваев нарисует мультик, в котором известный политолог и публицист Александр Конь ебет Масяню и выложит это на свой ютуб - я ему заплачу за это пятьдесят тысяч рублей. без наебалова.
🤣3,030custom 5226635265455433220517custom 5305417790436417835298custom 5294367724347073084112❤74custom 530116126309771714073🔥50😁38
создатель Масяни ноет - сколько он там хуй хохлам сосал, сколько рассказывал про кровавые преступления - а денег всё равно не дали. ни один украинец, сука, не помог. я считаю, создателю Масяни нужно протянуть руку помощи от патриотического сообщества. всего за несколько десятков тысяч рублей в следующем выпуске Масяня будет говорить про свинорез, обвешается зетками и напялит на себя ватник. я лет двадцать уже эту …
🤣3,070custom 5305417790436417835608❤152💯140😁83custom 522663526545543322065custom 527649956517905477241custom 530116126309771714036
почему ко мне до сих пор не подослали китайскую шпионку, которая начала бы выманивать государственные тайны половым путем? мне вообще насрать, я бы мгновенно всё и всех сдал.
🤣2,450custom 5294367724347073084601😁223custom 5305417790436417835135custom 522663526545543322079💯55custom 530116126309771714042❤12
вы все, суки бля, заплатите. вы сами будете у нас все отсасывать. мы трахнем ваших мам, а вы будете смотреть и плакать, как побитые шлюхи. когда мы приедем в Голливуд и найдём этих мирамаксовских сук, мы накормим их своим дерьмом. потом они сожрут дерьмо, оставшееся от их дерьма, которое мы заставим их схавать. и вы все, суки бля, следующие.
🤣2,240custom 5305417790436417835721custom 5301161263097717140558🔥102custom 522663526545543322069❤63👍30🤡12
этот пост прокомментируют только ДОЛБОЕБЫ.
🤣1,230custom 5305417790436417835498custom 5226635265455433220262custom 5294367724347073084188custom 527649956517905477239🖕17😁15🔥11
зато со мной произошел САМЫЙ БЫСТРЫЙ и самый тупой в мире бан от хохлухи. в ответ на ее пост про российскую оккупацию я просто написал ее имя. от написания до бана прошло секунды четыре)))))
🤣3,600custom 5305417790436417835675custom 5226635265455433220208custom 527649956517905477284custom 529436772434707308444😁40custom 530116126309771714035❤27
вообще эти переговоры меня чёт расстроили. и как автора, и по-людски. не, я ничего особенного от них и не ожидал, но если отмотать мой же собственный канал назад, на любые предыдущие переговоры, то можно копировать совершенно любой пост, постить сейчас - и не будет НИКАКОЙ СУКА РАЗНИЦЫ. разве что тогда Мединский больше хохлов чморил в прессухе, а сейчас - европейцев. я могу сидеть, высасывать из пальца какую-нибудь…
💯2,080custom 5305417790436417835474👍241😢92❤81custom 530116126309771714060custom 522663526545543322052custom 529436772434707308433
результаты переговоров: хохлы все еще ни на что не согласны, им нужны условия похуже
🤣2,580custom 53054177904364178351,070💯593😁109custom 527649956517905477278✍21🔥17🕊13
⚡️В Краснодаре депутатов обязали ходить по квартирам и выявлять «протестные настроения» среди жителей. - здравствуйте, как ваши дела? - ты кто? тебя ебет? - ты че охуел, я депутат - ну и пошел нахуй, депутат (записываем: жилец протестует против действующей власти)
🤣3,390custom 5226635265455433220477custom 5305417790436417835295❤76💯76custom 529436772434707308437🔥32🖕8
Showing the 12 most recent of 384 posts we hold for @sashakon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@sashakon edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @sashakon as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 140 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 184 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Саша Конь” (@sashakon), 132,976 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sashakon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.