Не просто рассказываю, но и пытаюсь объяснить. Личный канал Александра Файба
По рекламе – к @georgy_w, а мне написать – @faibeto
Выступления: @EmpireOfMusic_Tabriz
Если вы сценарист: CV на [email protected]
Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3FtgHY
Created
30 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net -555. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 202,709–203,518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 18:14
202,870
-68
19 Sept 2026, 06:19
202,938
+9
16 Sept 2026, 20:18
202,929
+127
14 Sept 2026, 20:18
202,802
-47
13 Sept 2026, 05:38
202,849
-35
11 Sept 2026, 06:15
202,884
-88
8 Sept 2026, 11:15
202,972
-81
5 Sept 2026, 05:42
203,053
-38
3 Sept 2026, 09:28
203,091
-92
2 Sept 2026, 06:11
203,183
-47
1 Sept 2026, 08:27
203,230
-46
31 Aug 2026, 05:15
203,276
-3
30 Aug 2026, 03:38
203,279
-8
29 Aug 2026, 04:34
203,287
-14
28 Aug 2026, 02:24
203,301
-36
27 Aug 2026, 02:12
203,337
-15
26 Aug 2026, 02:35
203,352
-13
25 Aug 2026, 01:36
203,365
-7
23 Aug 2026, 16:35
203,372
+71
21 Aug 2026, 23:25
203,301
first reading
Engagement
102 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.2%
avg views ÷ 202,870 subscribers
Avg views / post
47,200
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 102 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
102 (30 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
2,405,500
Reactions total
72,166
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,600
Videos
≈175
Links
≈1,550
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
19m 32s
Average length
3m 15s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
119,646 reactions across 92 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50,859
42.5%
😁
20,905
17.5%
🔥
16,616
13.9%
👍
8,547
7.14%
✍
6,055
5.06%
😱
4,761
3.98%
🎉
4,446
3.72%
🤔
3,685
3.08%
😢
3,216
2.69%
😐
556
0.465%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133,522 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.98%
1 of 102 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
36,900
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
43,400
over 101 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqua376B
1
14 August 2026
14 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
New York Times подвели итоги важного голосования за лучшие сериалы последних 26 лет.
Голосовали только профессионалы индустрии, всего 500+ человек.
Первое место – без сюрпризов.
"Игра престолов" – 6.
"Офис" - 11.
"Чернобыль" – 19.
"Остаться в живых" – 22.
"Лучше звоните Солу" – 27.
"Братья по оружию" – 28.
"Озарк" – 68.
"Декстер" – 88.
"Сопрано" – не вошел (первая серия вышла еще в ХХ веке).
👍 – с выбором…
В 1961 сотрудник MIT Фернандо Корбато ввел пароли на первой ЭВМ, которой одновременно пользовались несколько исследователей.
Это был первый компьютерный пароль. Какой именно, мы не знаем.
Пароли нужны были для учета. Каждому исследователю давали четыре часа экранного времени в неделю (у многих сейчас в день – в два раза больше). Пароль не давал другим воспользоваться твоими лимитами.
Система работала, пока ее за н…
Эффект Даннинга-Крюгера – это эффект Манделы?
В 1999 психолог Дэвид Даннинг и его аспирант Джастин Крюгер опубликовали статью "Некомпетентные и не знающие об этом".
Они тестировали студентов на логику, грамматику и проч., а потом просили прикинуть, как те справились на фоне остальных. По результатам разбили всех на четыре группы, от худшей четверти к лучшей.
Студенты из худшей четверти обошли по баллам всего 12% о…
Сегодня мне 39.
Возраст, когда в твоем плейлисте соседствуют Воскресенский и Эрик Клэптон, твои друзья, которые звали бухать, теперь с той же настойчивостью зовут бегать, а ты плотно зажат между поколением "помнишь, как в том меме?" и поколением "помнишь, как в том анекдоте?".
Спасибо тем, кто не зная меня лично, говорит такие теплые слова, что хочется растаять, и тем, кто меня лично знает, поддерживает и не дает с…
С оленями есть проблема. Они бывают радиоактивными
В 1958 у мыса Томпсон на Аляске собирались вырыть глубоководную гавань. Вместо лопаты – две водородные бомбы общей мощностью ~2,4 мегатонны.
Место подавали как абсолютную пустошь, где ни души, но для перестраховки заказали 40 экологических исследований.
Оказалось, что местные инуиты, которых часто называют эскимосами, – одни из самых облученных людей на планете.
…
Когда Стиву Джобсу было семь лет, они с отцом (мастером на все руки) строили забор. Отец сказал: внутреннюю сторону надо делать такой же красивой, как и внешнюю. Стив удивился: зачем, если никто не увидит?
Отец ответил: "Но ты-то будешь знать".
Этот принцип Джобс пронес через всю жизнь и стал главным перфекционистом мира IT.
При сборке девайсов он требовал, чтобы идеальным было все. Настаивал, чтобы каждая плата б…
Впервые увидел в зале человека с электронной сигаретой (кажется, такую называют "ашка").
Во время подходов ярко салатовая электронка откладывалась в сторону, а по завершении – снова употреблялась по назначению в углу зала.
Сравнимо с походом на концерт классической музыки в наушниках с шумоподавлением, где на максимальной громкости играет "Ты не бойся ночи, ведь я рядом".
Наткнулся на огромную статью в The New Yorker о соперничестве Китая и США за мировое лидерство.
Много любопытных историй и попыток анализа, но поражают голые цифры.
• Мощности Китая в судостроении прямо сейчас примерно в 200 раз выше американских.
• В Китае работает больше промышленных роботов, чем во всем остальном мире.
• Завод Xiaomi под Пекином, размером со сто футбольных полей, построили за 14 месяцев. Готов…
Как можно показывать туристам руины/фрагменты исторического наследия на примере Бецковского замка в Словакии.
Все аналоговое, простое и максимально впечатляющее.
В 1826 в порт Марселя привезли очень странное существо: пятнистое, 3,5 метра в высоту и с длинной шеей.
Это был первый жираф в истории Франции – подарок правителя Египта королю Карлу Х.
В Париж Зарафу (имя животного) повели пешком. В каждом городе к ней сбегались десятки тысяч человек.
В столице за одно лето красивейший пятнистый подарок увидели 600 тысяч человек.
Страну накрыла настоящая жирафомания. Дамы делали…
Сладок ли запретный плод? Результаты экспериментов
В библейской Книге Бытия в райском саду нет ни яблока, ни груши, только "плод". О том, что именно его запретность привлекла Еву, там не сказано.
Ближайшая по смыслу библейская формулировка: "утаенный хлеб приятен", а совсем похожая – "мы всегда стремимся к запретному" – из элегии римского поэта Овидия про ревнивого мужа и жену сторожа.
У нас фразу канонизировал Пу…
Советская пропаганда против СПИД в 1980-х не чуралась двусмысленности и попкультурных отсылок
🔥1,150😁446❤159😱78✍26🤔25😐19
Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @etofaib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Николай Жаринов 💀 @litsomel · 30,509 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
Сергей Минаев @minaevlife · 318,588 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Redroom Text @redroomtext · 75,931 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
ЧТИВО @chtvmag · 130,617 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
PunkMonk @punkmonkprod · 20,986 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 September 2026
GEO @GEOSHOW · 77,794 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
вы ушли с маршрута @ushli_s_marshruta · 157,430 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Простая экономика @prostoecon · 297,307 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Правила жизни @pravilamagru · 63,713 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
После_Завтра | Николай Дубинин @poslezavtraofficial · 54,011 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Менталист @mentalroom · 22,440 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
Art Is New Sexy 🍓 @artisnewsexy · 25,146 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Хочу домой - Путешествия, в которые вы не поедете @hochu_domoj · 30,198 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
Фаустов Лес @faust21century · 73,568 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Грег @gregjgeek · 23,197 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
YaAndArt. Искусство, история, культура @YaAndArt · 30,930 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Лекторий Dостоевский @dostoevsky_fm_dostoverno · 79,435 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
ЧД @che_d_e · 37,585 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
ПОРА @tochnopora · 88,193 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Правое полушарие Интроверта @artforintrovert · 55,215 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
мистика @missssstika · 76,190 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
MovieChannel @movie7channel · 22,462 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
Другая История @historyzx · 40,694 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
ТС @tihonsm · 41,873 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Это Файб” (@etofaib), 202,870 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etofaib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
