Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ФИНСАЙД

@finside

On this record: Previous handles · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,210subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001068161608
TypeChannel
Username@finside
Created8 February 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/finside

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Финсайд — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

20,21020,23120,220.55 August 2026 — 20,231 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,231 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,230 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,226 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,222 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,219 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,215 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,213 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,210 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,207–20,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:5720,210-3
12 Aug 2026, 07:0720,213-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:2320,215-4
9 Aug 2026, 03:5220,219-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:3120,222-4
7 Aug 2026, 01:2520,226-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:1020,230-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:0620,231no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:2620,231first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 20,210 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,720
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (26 June 202624 July 2026)
Views total26,040
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,790
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,080
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqxYumrh126 June 202626 June 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 24 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC≈2,330 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vkladerPhoto

Александра Баязитова («Адские бабки») выходит на свободу В конце июля 2026 года завершается срок заключения Александры Баязитовой — экономической журналистки и автора телеграм-канала «Адские бабки», чьё дело стало одним из самых громких процессов вокруг Telegram-каналов. Баязитова много лет специализировалась на экономике, банках и налогах. Она работала в «Коммерсанте», «Известиях», публиковалась на Life.ru, выпуст

22 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC≈4,200 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

О том, что дача денег в управление на крипторынке заканчивается бедой почти всегда, в моей книге про скам в крипте есть целая глава под номером 22. Называется она «Управляющий всегда в плюсе». Начало главы — на иллюстрации.

22 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC≈2,470 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @vklader

Анализ криптокошелька пропавшего в мае криптоэксперта, бравшего деньги в управление, Ивана Андреева («Инсайдер») показал следующие детали: Обороты. За последний год на адрес поступило почти 12 млн USDT. Игровая зависимость. Около 7 млн долларов было переведено на адреса, связанные с онлайн-казино. Криминальный след. В конце апреля и начале мая 2026 года (незадолго до исчезновения) зафиксированы две транзакции (на 10

15 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC≈3,470 viewsread 12 August 2026

В июне главным нетто-покупателем российских акций стали частные инвесторы. На вторичном рынке физлица купили бумаг на 27,8 млрд рублей больше, чем продали. Это почти вдвое выше среднего результата за предыдущие 12 месяцев — 14,1 млрд рублей — и заметно больше майского значения в 19,9 млрд. На другой стороне рынка оказались профессиональные управляющие. НФО в рамках доверительного управления продали акций на 22,8 млр

15 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC≈6,280 viewsread 12 August 2026

В Южной Корее количество розничных счетов с кредитным плечом, по которым возникло требование внести дополнительное обеспечение, превысило 1,2 млн. Примерно 320–360 тыс. счетов были принудительно закрыты брокерами. Рынок переживал не однодневный обвал, а завершение чрезвычайно спекулятивного роста, который несколько месяцев подпитывался ажиотажем вокруг искусственного интеллекта, полупроводников и покупками акций в д

14 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC≈4,570 viewsread 12 August 2026

В контексте претензий клиентов к Альфа-банку, который завлёк их в покупку цифровых финансовых активов (ЦФА) «Евротранса», необходимо отметить, что это вообще плохая идея — следовать советам собственного брокера. Ведь рекомендует он зачастую не лучший продукт для клиента, а наиболее выгодный для себя или своей финансовой группы. Примеры: — ПИФы под управлением аффилированной УК, особенно фонды с высокой ежегодной коми

14 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 12 August 2026

IPO оборонной компании Anduril откладывается, так как ей удалось привлечь раунд размером $5 млрд при оценке $61 млрд от группы фондов во главе с Thrive Capital и Andreessen Horowitz. Инвесторы рассчитывают сделать иксы на технологиях, которые разрабатывает Anduril: разведывательные и ударные беспилотники; дроны-перехватчики и системы борьбы с БПЛА; автономные подводные аппараты; системы наблюдения и охраны границ; н

14 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC≈4,930 viewsread 12 August 2026

Назревают скандальные разбирательства. Альфа-банк помогал «ЕвроТрансу» (оператор сети АЗС «Трасса», крупнейший акционер Игорь Мартышов) привлекать долги через цифровые финансовые активы (ЦФА). Выпуски размещались в информационной системе банка «А-Токен». Банк обеспечивал техническое проведение размещений и сбор заявок, предоставлял возможность приобрести ЦФА через «Альфа-Мобайл», «Альфа-Инвестиции» и «Альфа-Онлайн»,

14 Jul 2026, 09:58 UTC≈3,200 viewsread 12 August 2026

В июне физлица вложили в корпоративные облигации рекордные 161,9 млрд рублей, тогда как в ОФЗ — 34,5 млрд, в акции — 29,7 млрд. Частный инвестор всё заметнее превращается из совладельца компаний в их кредитора. При этом люди не лезут в бумаги с низкой надёжностью. Вложения населения в бумаги рейтинга от «B-» до «BBB» составляют менее 1% его облигационного портфеля. @finside

8 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC≈3,940 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @oleganisimov1Photo

Это статистика захода посетителей на сайт vklader. com с двух поисковиков, американского и российского. Сайт разоблачает финансовых мошенников. Приходящие из поиска люди, как правило, запрашивают название конкретного развода, то есть находятся на крючке у жуликов. Google даёт в 8,5 раз больше переходов. По другим моим сайтам наблюдается примерный паритет. Google выдаёт сайт в поиске нормально, каким-то образом поним

8 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC≈5,450 viewsread 12 August 2026

ЦБ внёс проект «Импакт Капитал» Валерия Золотухина в чёрный список за признаки незаконного привлечения инвестиций. Но, кажется, поздно. Только за 2021–2022 годы проект собрал с инвесторов 1,3 млрд рублей. @finside

6 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC≈5,530 viewsread 12 August 2026

Это честный трейдер. Такого вердикта от нас добиваются ежедневно. Мол, понятно, что кругом мошенники, но должны же быть и честные. Трейдеры. Они и помогут новичкам разбогатеть. Задающие вопрос расписываются в своём непонимании этой сферы в принципе. Потому как, если есть где-то успешный трейдер, то ему логично приумножать свой капитал или помогать это делать богатым за комиссию / зарплату, а не шарить по интернету

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @finside. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 440,429 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ФИНСАЙД” (@finside), 20,210 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finside.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.