Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ряды Фурье

Channel

Ряды Фурье

@Fourier_series

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

41,185subscribers

+186 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001929154720
TypeChannel
Username@Fourier_series
DescriptionВступайте в ряды Фурье! То, что вы пропустили про современную науку. Криво, однобоко и местами с этого угораем. Пруфы. Канал ведут @milfgard и @enjoykaz. По сотрудничеству к @fourier_ads. https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a1eb2823097106f3204821
Created4 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Fourier_series

Growth

40,99941,18541,0926 August 2026 — 40,999 subscribers6 August 2026 — 40,999 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,007 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,042 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,064 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,077 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,101 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,122 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,144 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,185 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +186. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,971–41,213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:5541,185+41
13 Aug 2026, 08:3441,144+22
12 Aug 2026, 05:3341,122+21
11 Aug 2026, 05:4641,101+24
10 Aug 2026, 05:1141,077+13
9 Aug 2026, 02:5641,064+22
8 Aug 2026, 01:5841,042+35
6 Aug 2026, 23:4441,007+8
6 Aug 2026, 04:0040,999no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:5240,999first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.1%
avg views ÷ 41,185 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,400
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held26 (10 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total426,490
Reactions total8,745
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
365
Videos
29
Links
586

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

11,231 reactions across 26 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3,72533.2%
3,30129.4%
😁1,0769.58%
💩8897.92%
👍8667.71%
🤣3112.77%
🥴1791.59%
👀1491.33%
💊1080.962%
❤‍🔥950.846%
🤔780.695%
530.472%
🆒480.427%
👌480.427%
470.418%
🎄400.356%
😱370.329%
330.294%
🤯260.232%
🦄190.169%
9 further kinds1030.917%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
131
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 26 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
44
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Fourier_series. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC≈6,590 views212 reactions3 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

— Вот поэтому невидимые к тебе и пристают. — Откуда ты знаешь, что они ко мне пристают? — Потому что они могут быть все-таки слегка видимы для изощренного зрения. Чуть-чуть, едва приметно… так, что-то вроде стеклистых червячков, плавающих в воздухе. Я давно их замечал над тобою. Да ты, вероятно, и сам их видел не раз, только не знал — кто они? Очарованный принц, Повесть о Ходже Насреддине, Л. В. Соловьёв Мы тут разо

90👀62🔥39😁13👌4🥴4

14 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈10,600 views453 reactions5 Starsread 16 August 2026

Был такой дядька Форер, тот ещё лютый тролль. Провёл психологический тест, пообещал каждому студенту индивидуальный портрет на его основе, потом всем выдал один и тот же из фраз из гороскопов. Все сочли описание очень точным (85%). Это случилось в 1949-м. В 1985 прикол решили повторить и даже дошли до журнала Природа с двойным слепым исследованием: — Взяли Национальный совет по геокосмическим исследованиям — это сам

🔥247😁13448👻13💊74

13 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈10,400 views227 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026

Минуточка инфоцыганства и информирования о нашей деятельности! Короче, мы тут месяца 3 назад побывали в Институте молекулярной биологии с лекцией про Клод Код и агентскую работу. Не для разработчиков. Преимущественно для учёных, хотя среди них затесались ещё маркетологи, сотрудница пенсионного фонда и прочие люди. Тоже не айтишники. Так вот, оказалось, что им всем это всё очень нужно. Они сидят в своих веб-чатах и

🔥12247💊27👍18🦄8❤‍🔥5

12 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC≈13,600 views356 reactions44 Starsread 16 August 2026

С глаз идёт не вся картинка, а апдейты изменившихся точек. Там чуть сложнее, но общий принцип такой. Идёт это в зрительную кору, которая описывает всё это токенами и пускает дальше в мозг так, что доходят считанные байты в секунду. Вычислительная мощность зрительной коры огромная, но пропускная способность на выходе очень низкая. Да и сознание само по себе с трудом переваривает больше 20 байт в секунду. А откуда то

187🔥12122❤‍🔥13😨10🍾3

10 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈16,500 views376 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026

Ура! У нас тут за последние годы сильно обновили список продуктов, которые лучше не есть! Подняли допуски на картошку, личи и марципаны, в маниоке нашли яды, ещё в сморчках, в черимойе и куче всего странного. Итак, @DoctorDee, @Figase подкинули новый уровень сложности для кухни. Маниока (кассава) — опасная, надо её вываривать. Высвобождается синильная кислота, она же есть во всяких косточках абрикоса и в горьком м

182🥴78🔥45😱37😁23🤝11

9 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈17,600 views350 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026

Краденая картошка-фри вкуснее! — подсказал работу @AnatoliMorozov. Пословиц дофига, у японцев для тихо стыренной и съеденной еды даже есть специальное слово — но численно никто не проверял. Теперь проверили в Москве: — Взяли 120 взрослых. — Каждому давали ровно 100 граммов картошки, приготовленной в одном и том же масле, одинаковой температуры и в одинаковых коробочках. — 4 ситуации: ест свою; его угощают; тырит у

🔥150😁12939👍24💯5🥴3

8 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈17,200 views331 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026

"А почему в зрительном поле появляются какие то симметричные угловатые узоры , темно-фиолетовых оттенков, когда мы давим себе на глаза? Причем характерный размер возникающих "ячеек" меняется по определенной схеме, сначала крупные, потом помельче и тп(просьба не отвечать "давить на глаза вредно!!" Да все в курсе)" — спросил @cyberbiosec. Во-первых, не надо прямо сейчас давить на глаза, чтобы посмотреть те же мультики

👍14877🔥47😁37🥴13🤔9

7 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC≈17,900 views561 reactions4 Starsread 16 August 2026

Следите за руками: — Вода замерзает при 0 °C. — Этиленгликоль замерзает при -13 °C. — А вот смесь воды (34%) с этиленгликолем (66%) замерзает при -70 °C. А какого, спрашивается, хрена? Ну, ответ очень простой. По той же причине, что это не друзья Вовочки воровали спирт. Если вы возьмёте 1 килограмм воды и 1 килограмм этилового спирта или этиленгликоля и смешаете, образуется 2 килограмма смеси. Но! 1 литр воды + 1

🔥38410038😁22💊10👀7

6 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈15,900 views253 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026

Что вы не пропустили за этот месяц! 5 самых пересылаемых постов: — Про файловую систему πfs, где всё можно хранить внутри π. — Почему какашки идут спиралями, и как какает червь, который какает снизу вверх. — Плохая новость — 149 лет — наш предел срока жизни. — Невероятная красота — вышла новая модель человеческой клетки от чувака, который уже много лет рисует их акварелью, а сейчас стал моделировать. — Что будет, е

😁16149👍24🤣12🔥7

5 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC≈18,900 views508 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Целебные домашние глисты! Дикие глисты нам вредят, а вот одомашненные могут помочь. В соседнем зверском чате всплыл вопрос, что человеки болеют разными аллергиями и другими аутоимунными заболеваниями. Их по большей части запускает оставшаяся без работы подсистема борьбы с паразитами. Гипотеза в том, что если заставить эту подсистему подметать плац ломом и чтобы задолбалась — лучше, чем если она будет шариться по ор

196🔥150👀67👍50💊29🆒16

3 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈29,400 views564 reactions2 Starsread 16 August 2026

Плохая новость — 149 лет — наш предел срока жизни. Хотя некоторые системы можно дотянуть и до 500 лет при уже современной науке. С другой стороны, это охренительно хорошая новость. Если учесть, что сейчас медиана 79 лет. здравствуйте. утверждается, что медикаментозные методы продления жизни человека в каком-то смысле безнадежны: соматические мутации в неделящихся клетках (нейроны, кардиомиотические и т. д.) огранич

289🔥163🤣61👌27🤔17🥴7

1 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈19,500 views353 reactions4 Starsread 16 August 2026

@IEOTG спросил, как сломать зуб хлебом, как это дважды сделал @DoctorDee. На этот вопрос ответ вам придётся найти самостоятельно (и он есть в чате). Потому что пост про другое! В процессе разъяснений нашлась одна офигенная работа — почему зубы такие кривые и странные. Ну, знаете, форма у них не самая математически-оптимальная. На первый взгляд. Можно было бы сделать же как отвёртки или там как молотки, или как тёрк

187😁77🔥47🤔26🥴9🗿7

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Fourier_series. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@Fourier_series edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 11,207 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Психолог Сергей Иванов
@ivanovsa_psy · 72
4 posts
Будда вне закона
@buddhainlaw · 240
3 posts
Ёж за ЗОЖ!
@ru_healthlife · 1,378
3 posts
Злоключения Ильи
@adventureofilya · 108
2 posts
Norlin Games
@NorlinGames · 248
2 posts
Think Metabolic
@thinkmetabolic · 109
2 posts
Большая книга Бо-Бо
@Ufa_Pediatr · 1,125
2 posts
«Коллекционер книг»
@A_book_collector · 64
1 post
လ — Обобщённо об обобщениях
@aboutpolit · 138
1 post
Alien Vampires
@alienvampiress · 33
1 post
Мир Сновидений и Астрология ✨
@astrodreams · 107
1 post
Kuzmin.pro
@avtooko · 1,598
1 post
Байесятина
@bayesyatinaa · 3,637
1 post
БиоТехСинтег | Биотех-Синтеграция
@biotechsynteg · 426
1 post
Софья Новосад
@dr_sofia_novosad · 282
1 post
Это твой дом 🌦 🌱 🐾
@eto_tvoi_dorn · 88
1 post
Eurecable News
@eurecable · 6
1 post
доказательный ⎵ пробел
@evidencespace · 1,312
1 post
Fedor&Music
@FE_music · 476
1 post
Grechka Channel
@grechkachannel · 173
1 post
Хатифнатты в поисках огородов
@hatifnatteninsearch · 85
1 post
Фи́ФА (канал о честной Фармакалогии и ФАрмации)
@honestpharma · 581
1 post
In search of time
@in_search_of_time · 136
1 post
"В трансе" с Ольгой Бендер
@inevotrance · 72
1 post
хроники Искателя 🦄
@Iskatel_13 · 3,291
1 post
Кайдзен своими словами
@kaizen_luchina · 339
1 post
Kamína
@kaminabro · 24
1 post
Khorny - Horny
@khornyhorny · 65
1 post
Князь Балконский
@knyazbalkonskiy · 10
1 post
Man, Death & Ethics
@mandeathandethics · 798
1 post
Mewone!
@mew_sect · 775
1 post
cheloVechek
@miroVechek · 1
1 post
Прикольный article
@nicearticle · 464
1 post
Мультидименшинал Гриднев
@omnidimeme · 155
1 post
PhysReal
@physreal · 57
1 post
Квантор возможности
@possibility_quantifier · 8
1 post
ПостПлутарх
@PostPlutarch · 31
1 post
Pseudomys_delicatus
@Pseudomys_delicatus · 81
1 post
Ёстика
@stat_vladimir · 223
1 post
Syntax and the City
@syntaxandcity · 165
1 post
Техно-медбрат
@tehnomedbrat · 55
1 post
AI гараж
@winopit · 41
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 60 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AI и точка.
@ai4telegram · 860,776
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ряды Фурье” (@Fourier_series), 41,185 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fourier_series.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.