Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЗаТелеком 🌐

@zatelecom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

64,553subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001108203137
TypeChannel
Username@zatelecom
Description#ЗаТелеком - это только про телеком - что было, что будет и чем сердце успокоится. Контакт с аффтором только через бот: @ForTelekom_support_bot
Created22 April 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zatelecom

Growth

64,55364,65964,6065 August 2026 — 64,617 subscribers6 August 2026 — 64,617 subscribers6 August 2026 — 64,623 subscribers7 August 2026 — 64,659 subscribers8 August 2026 — 64,649 subscribers9 August 2026 — 64,633 subscribers10 August 2026 — 64,610 subscribers11 August 2026 — 64,586 subscribers12 August 2026 — 64,553 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64,537–64,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:4464,553-33
11 Aug 2026, 11:5764,586-24
10 Aug 2026, 13:5764,610-23
9 Aug 2026, 15:1764,633-16
8 Aug 2026, 12:4764,649-10
7 Aug 2026, 09:4664,659+36
6 Aug 2026, 08:3164,623+6
6 Aug 2026, 01:3664,617no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:1864,617first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 64,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,100
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held65 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total852,930
Reactions total9,460
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
19,400
Videos
505
Links
11,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
56s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,521 reactions across 50 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳5,76076.6%
🌭1,76123.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,460reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 65 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zatelecom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈5,570 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ru_tech_talk

Обнаружено более 700 поддельных VPN-расширений для Chrome, нацеленных на русскоязычных пользователей По данным исследования компании Socket, почти треть из этих расширений копировали известные VPN-бренды, такие как Proton VPN, NordVPN, Surfshark, AdGuard VPN, Browsec, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, Windscribe, TunnelBear, 1.1.1.1, Outline и другие. Два случая примечательны тем, что это инструменты, которым российские поль

🐳52🌭12

12 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈9,160 views115 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrapress

Приложение Ozon Банка стало недоступно в магазине Google Play Удаление сервиса подтвердили в самой компании. В App Store Ozon Банк пока остается доступным.

🐳96🌭19

12 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈10,500 views142 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Это очень смешно — смотрите: задача же стоит буквально "повысить доверие сертификата". Вот буквально. Что для этого делается? Расширяют список оснований для отзыва сертификата. Ну так если сертификат могут в любой момент отозвать, в том числе "если решит наш суд", то я вот вообще не понимаю, зачем кому-то нахер нужно с этим самым НУЦ возиться - делаешь-делаешь, там приходит "наш суд" и твоя работа превратилась в ты

🐳127🌭15

12 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈10,500 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#людиработают Новороссийск (угу, тот самый)

🐳47🌭7

12 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈10,000 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#людиработают #RIP_PSTN Марракеш, Дворец Бахия

🐳47🌭7

12 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈10,500 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А то чот все забыли, что вообще-то война идет и оккупационные власти последовательно уничтожают телеком-инфраструктуру моей страны

🐳84🌭17

12 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈10,500 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @monitor_runetPhoto

☄️ОГРАНИЧЕНИЯ СВЯЗИ 11 АВГУСТА 52 региона России сообщили о шатдаунах мобильного интернета. Во всех 52 регионах вместе с отключениями мобильного интернета применяются "белые списки". Всего в 77 регионах было зафиксировано введение "белых списков". По остальным регионам у нас недостаточно информации. 👉Что делать, если отключают интернет? Скачай наш краткий гайд по шатдаунам и оставайся НА СВЯЗИ! У тебя не грузятс

🐳26🌭16

12 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC≈11,500 views118 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Телеком люк оператора Cellcom, Тель-Авив.

🐳103🌭15

12 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC≈12,900 views219 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ой, а что случилось?

🐳199🌭20

11 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC≈13,300 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Рязань, ул. Кремлевский вал #RIP_PSTN

🐳90🌭15

11 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC≈13,900 views131 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @safe_runet

На прошлой неделе сайты российских банков перешли на сертификат безопасности Минцифры России и перестали открываться в иностранных браузерах. Теперь они активно призывают пользователей устанавливать российский корневой сертификат на свои устройства. Сделать это нужно якобы для своего же удобства. Вот только никто не предупреждает, что это откроет огромную дыру в вашей цифровой безопасности. В новом видео Леонид Вол

🌭89🐳42

11 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC≈14,500 views75 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

На Арстехнике офигенская статья про историю поиска в интернете: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/08/remembering-the-pre-google-web-when-search-was-an-experiment/ На английском, конечно. Но в отличие от интернета девяностых, сейчас любую страницу, любой текст на любом языке можно за доли секунды перевести на любой другой. Так что ностальгию автора (Алана Бредли) по "теплому ламповому интернету до поисковых движк

🐳62🌭13

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @zatelecom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 14,075 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Код.ру
@d_code · 381,029
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Илья Варламов
@varlamov · 238,699
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Outline VPN Official
@OutlineVpnOfficial · 223,478
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
GitHub Community
@github · 149,921
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Накипело. Майкл Наки
@Nackepelo · 212,790
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 306,640
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 165,881
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Cloudflare (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…Дурова|date=2024-11-06|access-date=2025-02-28}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/zatelecom/29219|title=ЗаТелеком 🌐|website=Telegram|access-date=2025-02-…”
read 9 August 2026
Общество защиты интернета (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…деятельности ФБК, чем борьбе за свободу интернета{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/zatelecom/29378|title=ЗаТелеком 🌐|website=Telegram|access-date=2025-04-…”
read 9 August 2026

Hacker News

This handle was named 2 times in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗаТелеком 🌐” (@zatelecom), 64,553 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zatelecom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.