Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TechnoWeekdays

@ssc_blog

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

815subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001428945955
TypeChannel
Username@ssc_blog
DescriptionТехнологические Будни
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ssc_blog

Growth

8156 Aug 2026, 14:47 — 815 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 15:19 — 815 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:476 Aug 2026, 15:19
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 814–816 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 15:19815no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:47815first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
106
Videos
5
Links
362

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

227 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁6528.6%
👍6026.4%
🔥4218.5%
3615.9%
😢93.96%
😭62.64%
🤷41.76%
🤣31.32%
10.441%
🌚10.441%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2025 to 3 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ssc_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 January 2025 to 3 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Mar 2026, 15:02 UTC756 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Агент за последние сутки принес около 20 постов из LI с трендами в e-commerce за 2026, так что я решил сделать свою версию =) 📦 1. Предиктивная доставка 📢 Обещание: «Мы отправим товар до того, как вы его купите!» 💀 Реальность: Amazon прислал мне ведерко мороженого и коробку салфеток во вторник. В четверг меня бросила девушка. Алгоритм узнал об этом раньше меня. ⭐️ 5 звезд за точность, ⭐️ 1 звезда за эмоциональный ур

😁12😭6👍1

Signed Andrei Rebrov

25 Feb 2026, 16:25 UTC679 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кстати, накатал небольшую статью как я настроил для себя nanoclaw https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-built-personal-ai-assistant-using-nanoclaw-runs-my-day-rebrov--z89le/

👍51

Signed Andrei Rebrov

25 Feb 2026, 13:39 UTC423 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Если ваш стартап это фича, не удивляйтесь если однажды утром ему придет конец. Добро пожаловать в эру Service as a Software.

😁1

Signed Andrei Rebrov

25 Feb 2026, 13:39 UTC597 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @TheedinorogblogPhoto

😢 «Я проснулась сегодня, а Claude убил мой стартап»: история Ирины Боднарь Наверное, один из главных страхов основателей AI-стартапов, что гиганты, вроде Anthropic или OpenAI, запустят конкурирующую штуку. Вот это случилось с проектом Ryze AI Ирины Боднарь, о чем она написала большой пост в X. Он, кстати, неплохо разошелся — 4,2 млн просмотров за два дня. Ryze AI делает AI-агента, который управляет рекламными кампа

👍31🌚1😁1

Signed Andrei Rebrov

24 Feb 2026, 13:42 UTC484 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ловушка «бесплатного» Open Source: OpenClaw Edition CFO: «Почему наш счет за AWS в этом месяце вырос на $4,000?» Я: «Зато мы сэкономили $50 на лицензии, перейдя на OpenClaw». Классическая ловушка 2026 года. 📢 Питч: «Замените Salesforce/HubSpot/Jira на OpenClaw! Это опенсорс! Это бесплатно! Данные остаются у вас!» 💀 Реальность: 🗓 День 1 Скачал OpenClaw. Чувствую себя гением. _«Смотрите, я полностью контролирую св

😁5🔥4

Signed CtoChannelHelper

16 Feb 2026, 17:16 UTC731 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁30🔥2

Signed Andrei Rebrov

6 Feb 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,300 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Так, мальчики, девочки и AI агенты, я тут немножко залечу на крутой ивент от Алекса Беляева Тема: Команды AI-агентов & AI: 20+ персональных AI юзкейсов в продукте, маркетинге и бизнесе от топов в своем деле. В общем, стильно, молодежно, хайп и вот этот все Лично для меня, очень круто смотреть, как в первую очередь НЕ технические люди используют клод и прочие штуки, прям местами отвал башки. Cпикеры: • Artsiom San

🔥10👍3

Signed Andrei Rebrov

22 Jan 2026, 14:43 UTC893 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Только что прочитал отчёт Recurly State of Subscription 2026. Из интересного: Рост подписок замедлился с 15.4% до 12.6%. Эра "привлекай любой ценой" закончилась. Погнали по цифрам: Пауза — ваш новый лучший друг Бренды, предлагающие паузу перед отменой, увидели рост пауз на 337%. И вот что важно — 3-4 из этих подписчиков возвращаются в течение нескольких месяцев. 12% клиентов реально предпочитают паузу отмене. Мо

🔥124

Signed CtoChannelHelper

21 Jan 2026, 23:58 UTC673 views19 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Вот вам альтернативный тейк рынка найма 2026. Компании будут нанимать больше активной молодежи, которая умеет в промты, у которой нет груза опыта предыдущих лет (еще мой дед писал скрипты таким образом, не мне менять!) и которая умеет общаться. А вот всяких токсичных лидов, синьоров и прочих попросят на улицу потому что они постоянно ноют, AI пишет не оптимальный код, эти маркетолухи ничего не понимают и так далее.

18😁1

Signed Andrei Rebrov

14 Jan 2026, 14:13 UTC≈2,940 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Последние пару недель активно использую OpenSpec при работе с курсором и вот что я могу сказать. Если вы продукт менеджер: - Без доступа к PNL - Без доступа к метрикам - Не понимаете как работает бизнес - Не находитесь внутри рынка, для которого делаете продукт - Не понимаете технических аспектов разработки У меня для вас плохие новости. Аналогично, если вы разработчик: - Не умеющий задавать вопросы - Не понимаете

👍15🔥54

Signed Andrei Rebrov

13 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC596 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Давно не постил, а тут такой contorversial пост попался, так что вот вам моя точка зранеия. Начнем с чиселок по e-commerce: - Shopify это примерно ~29–30% e-commerce в штатах и 12% глобально - Stripe обрабатывает ~68% e-commerce транзакций в штатах ~17%–20.8% глобально - Большая часть транзакций Shopify обрабатывается Stripe то есть в любом случае тут выиграет страйп Теперь про технологии. Как вы знаете, у меня ес

🔥5👍2

Signed Andrei Rebrov

13 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC666 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ctodailyPhoto

О, война платежных стандартов в ИИ! 3 месяца назад OpenAI совместно со Stripe (крупнейший карточный процессинг с фокусом на разработчиков) разработали свой протокол для покупок внутри ChatGPT — Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP). И вот вчера Google совместно с Shopify (крупнейшая платформа для создания интернет-магазинов) представили Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP). Совсем упрощая, это чтобы можно было покупать тов

😁4👍1

Signed Andrei Rebrov

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ssc_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 458,707 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TechnoWeekdays” (@ssc_blog), 815 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ssc_blog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.