Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мы и Жо / медиа и журналистика

@themedia

Has discussion group

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10,848subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001009546257
TypeChannel
Username@themedia
DescriptionПроект Александра Амзина о медиа и журналистике Аналитика, тренды и новости. Верим в журналистику и собираем сообщество профессионалов. Клуб: https://t.me/+WKiI6ncBxj1kXVNV Сайт: themedia.center По всем вопросам: @alamzin Реклама не размещается
Created23 September 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/themedia

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Мы и Жо — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

10,84410,86410,8545 August 2026 — 10,864 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,861 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,855 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,848 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,844 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,845 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,847 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,848 subscribers10,8485 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,841–10,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:4710,848+1
11 Aug 2026, 12:3810,847+2
10 Aug 2026, 09:5710,845+1
9 Aug 2026, 08:4110,844-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:4610,848-7
7 Aug 2026, 07:1010,855-6
6 Aug 2026, 08:5010,861-3
5 Aug 2026, 18:4010,864first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.54%
avg views ÷ 10,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
600
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 53 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held53 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total31,826
Reactions total329
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,730
Videos
51
Links
6,130

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

329 reactions across 38 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁8124.6%
👍4914.9%
4212.8%
💊278.21%
🤯164.86%
🔥133.95%
🕊103.04%
😍92.74%
🤮92.74%
👀82.43%
😢82.43%
🤬82.43%
🤡72.13%
💯61.82%
💅51.52%
💩51.52%
😭41.22%
😐30.912%
😡30.912%
🫡30.912%
8 further kinds133.95%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC113 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кожаные закончились, теперь можно начать подбрасывать кремниевым

😁2

12 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC119 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mediazona_exclusive

ИИ-чатбот Character AI оштрафовали на 1 млн 250 тыс рублей за «пропаганду наркотиков» Об этом сообщает корреспондент «Медиазоны» из зала Таганского суда Москвы. В суде сказали, что протокол на компанию-разработчика Character Technologies, inc составили из-за чат-бота о мефедроне. Раннее этот же суд уже штрафовал компанию на 7,5 млн рублей по протоколам о «пропаганде ЛГБТ» и неудалении запрещенной информации. Их со

12 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC188 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zakharovchannel

Про Малофеева и «Крипту». Только добрался до заметки Би-би-си про итоги «дела издателей» – уголовного дела в отношении сотрудников издательства «Эксмо» за «пропаганду ЛГБТ-книг». Там есть такой момент. «“Я в первую очередь думаю про [владельца телеканала „Царьград“, бизнесмена] Константина Малофеева», — говорит о возможных интересантах «дела издателей» сотрудник «Эксмо-АСТ“». Версия, что Малофеев мог быть инициат

12 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC534 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

новостная интернет-журналистика — на картинке ждем, надеемся, верим Люди, автомобили и животные начнут подниматься в воздух. Объекты внутри помещений будут двигаться вверх, достигая высоты около 15–20 метров. Возникнет массовая паника, сопровождаемая хаосом и разрушениями инфраструктуры.

😍9

12 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC545 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

кстати pic somewhat related

😁221👍1

12 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC468 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ctodaily

Модели Anthropic начали вшивать в текст секретные водяные знаки. Текст можно переписать огромным числом вариантов, просто меняя синонимы. Теперь, модели выбирают эти синонимы не случайно, и в последовательности этих не-случайностей зашит сигнал, что текст сгенерирован нейросетью. Лингвистическую стеганографию (тайное письмо за счет замены синонимов) обсуждали ещё в начале 2000-х, но в 2022 ученый из OpenAI описал,

🤝21🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC512 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @meduzalive

Сооснователь радиостанции «Эхо Петербурга» Сергей Недоводин умер после избиения. Один из нападавших представился участником войны Один из основателей радиостанции «Эхо Петербурга» и бывший исполнительный директор станции Сергей Недоводин умер в возрасте 61 года. Недоводин с конца июня находился в реанимации и не приходил в сознание, пишет «Ротонда». В больницу он попал после избиения в Подмосковье, где жил в послед

🤬4😡3👍1😢1

11 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC558 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @napolyahmedia

🟡 Журналисты на выборах: сверьтесь с правилами Фонд «Центр защиты прав СМИ» обновил гайд для журналистов и редакций о работе во время избирательной кампании. В нём собраны правила информирования, агитации, публикации опросов, аккредитации на участках, съёмки и ответственности за нарушения. По новому порядку ЦИК, голосование в 2026 году пройдёт 18, 19 и 20 сентября, заявки на аккредитацию журналистов нужно подать за

11 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC561 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Linkedin два режима репоста Один, куда можно дописать что-то от себя, называется «репост с мыслями» Другой, чтобы не писать «бессмысленный репост», тактично назвали Repost instantly

💯6😁5

11 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC482 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Vedomosti_Moskovskogo_GosudarstvPhoto

Первые полосы российских газет 11 августа 2026 года

1👍1

11 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC458 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @planerka_orgPhoto

В Великобритании радиостанция ошибочно выдала в эфир «заранее подготовленное» сообщение о смерти короля Карла III. Когда ведущий понял, что произошло, он в панике сбежал из прямого эфира, оставив слушателей на 16 минут в полной тишине.

🤯82😁2👎1

11 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC517 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @gijnRuPhoto

Пособие журналиста по расследованию криптовалют — уже на русском! Преступники и коррупционеры используют криптовалюту, чтобы незаметно перемещать деньги через границы и уходить от налогов. Лоббистам она позволяет тайно направлять баснословные суммы политикам. Это делает расследование криптовалютных транзакций всё более важной частью журналистики, обеспечивающей подотчётность власти. Но для того, чтобы справиться с

👍53

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @themedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTCFinal Results131 voters

Сколько абзацев в телеграмном посте вы способны выдержать без зевоты и прокручивания?

  1. Главное — одна строчка, я выхватываю заголовки2%
  2. Одного-двух абзацев вполне хватает. Как в «Раньше всех. Ну почти»8%
  3. Я считаю, что пост — это как новость, но на один абзац короче. То есть три абзаца норм18%
  4. Текст он и есть текст, четыре-шесть абзацев тоже норм, главное чтобы все уместилось14%
  5. Мне длина не так важна, как осмысленность. Я даже простыни аналитические иногда читаю40%
  6. Мало что пролистываю. Поддерживаю новый формат статей в телеграме, наконец-то моя длина2%
  7. Я вообще не по текстам, больше люблю картинки и видосы0%
  8. По-разному бывает, все от подачи зависит10%
  9. Затрудняюсь ответить0%
  10. Не буду отвечать, хочу глянуть результаты5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 143,598 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мы и Жо / медиа и журналистика” (@themedia), 10,848 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/themedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.