Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Стой под стрелой

@nikitonsky_pub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

11,790subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001339432494
TypeChannel
Username@nikitonsky_pub
Created10 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nikitonsky_pub

Growth

11,79011,80211,7966 August 2026 — 11,802 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,802 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,795 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,799 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,800 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,798 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,788–11,804 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 02:0411,790-8
12 Aug 2026, 17:5811,798-2
11 Aug 2026, 14:4211,800-1
9 Aug 2026, 13:1111,801+2
8 Aug 2026, 11:4211,799+4
7 Aug 2026, 08:2611,795-6
6 Aug 2026, 08:3011,801-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:3511,802no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:0411,802first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.4%
avg views ÷ 11,790 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,600
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (4 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total86,370
Reactions total1,793
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,656 reactions across 21 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1,10623.8%
😁83517.9%
71915.4%
👍71615.4%
💔3317.11%
🤪1433.07%
🤡1392.99%
🤔1292.77%
🤣801.72%
🌚701.50%
😭501.07%
🎅440.945%
🥱400.859%
👎350.752%
🤩200.43%
🦄200.43%
😢190.408%
🫡190.408%
🔥180.387%
💊130.279%
26 further kinds1102.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,897reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈3,820 views180 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Волей случая посмотрел несколько видосов, как фаундеры всяких стартапов презентуют новый апдейт или фичу. И казалось бы, люди заморочились, все спланировали, студию сняли, свет поставили, звук настроили, скрипт написали, фаундера на табуреточку посадили и... заставили читать с телепромптера. И это так крипово! У человека, читающего с телепромптера, энергия оленя, выбежавшего в свет фар: все вычислительные ресурсы мо

94👍43💯32🤡4🌚3🔥2🎅1👀1

Signed Nikita Prokopov

6 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈7,020 views202 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Илья Бирман нашел твит американского дизайнера Тобайаса ван Шнайдера: > As a Designer, if you care about making well-designed things, you should surround yourself with well designed things in your life. > You'll absorb more than you think. > The watch you wear, your furniture, the car you drive, the software you use... everything you passively use throughout the day becomes a reference point, or think of it as a b

99💯55👍20🤡10🤔9🥱61🎅1

Signed Nikita Prokopov

4 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈7,070 views119 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Я уже писал про мои мечты о «правильном» визивиге. Первой идеей было поведение на границе регионов с разной разметкой. Идея в том, что к курсору прилипает стиль того, откуда он пришел. Пришел на границу из жирного? Будешь писать жирным. Пришел, наоборот, из обычного? Будешь писать обычным. В том же самом месте, на той же самой границе. Есть еще идея делать в одном месте два шага, но она мне нравится меньше. Сегодня

👍6927🤔7🤡4🤯4🎅2👎2🐳1

Signed Nikita Prokopov

3 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC≈6,200 views83 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Перебирал почту в поисках лидов на работу и обнаружил, что в конце июля-начале августа 2021-го мне одновременно написали примерно 10 фаундеров с предложением поговорить о работе. Ни до, ни после ничего такого не было. Что случилось в июле 2021-го?

🤔54😁16🤡8👍3🎅2

Signed Nikita Prokopov

1 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC≈8,960 views273 reactionsread 13 August 2026

С одной стороны, психолог говорит, что надо быть собой и не стесняться своих убеждений. С другой, рекрутеры явно не хотят слышать то, что я думаю. Господи, насколько проще была бы моя жизнь, если бы я реально чувствовал энтузиазм по поводу Джаваскрипта, а вершиной интерфейсостроения считал Некст.жс.

😁149💯8022🤡9😢6🌚3🎅2🤷‍♂2

Signed Nikita Prokopov

27 Jul 2026, 00:25 UTC≈15,200 views216 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Почти с самого создания этого канала (пост 102 и далее, 2021 год) я пишу о том, что программировать слишком сложно и как я с этим внутренне не согласен. Количество усилий на порядки больше получаемого результата. Условно, придумать и описать туду-приложение — 30 минут. Запилить, чтобы оно вот прям у тебя на телефоне появилось — дни, недели, месяцы. Я все списывал на accidental complexity, которую привносят наши инст

90😭50😁39🤡20💩6🤔4🎅2🤷‍♂2

Signed Nikita Prokopov

22 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC≈12,800 views123 reactionsread 13 August 2026

У Vsauce попалось видео про задачу, которую фейлят большинство людей. Называется The Reasoning Test Psychologists Still Can't Explain. Задача такая: - Перед вами на стол выкладывают четыре карты, на которых написано: A, G, 7, 8 - По условию, на каждой карте с одной стороны цифра, с другой буква. Т.е. на A и G с обратной стороны какие-то цифры (вы их не видите), на 7 и 8, соответственно, буквы, которые вы не видите т

65👍28😁12❤‍🔥6🤓4🤡4🎅2👌1

Signed Nikita Prokopov

16 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC≈11,400 views200 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Ваня Гришаев (канал igrishaev_blog) показал скриншот окна iTerm, предлагающего установить плагин для просмотра веб-страниц (браузер то есть) прямо в терминале. И удивляется: кому такое вообще в голову пришло? Действительно, кому. Но раз это сделали, значит причина — какая бы она не была дурная — была. Как-то люди себе это объясняли. И я решил попытаться ее понять. Терминал, понятно, появился не от хорошей жизни, а

👍97😁50💯1917🤔6🥱5🤡3🎅2

Signed Nikita Prokopov

15 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC≈13,900 views397 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Понравилась фраза из кулуаров конференции, от разработчика библиотеки: «ИИ хотя бы читает документацию»

😁258🤣79💯33🦄7👍54💊3😎3

Signed Nikita Prokopov

9 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC≈12,800 views149 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Покажите скриншот пет-проекта, который вы сделали благодаря ИИ? Ну и пару слов что делает

🌚6425🤡16🔥12😁10👍7💊7🤮4

Signed Nikita Prokopov

8 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC≈12,700 views253 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Когда кто-нибудь кому-нибудь рассказывает, что чтобы что-то там установить, надо «скопировать шелл-команду и вставить в терминал», все почему-то обязательно добавляют «это небезопасно, конечно...» А я эту добавку никогда не понимал. Ты и так качаешь рандомный бинарник с целью его запустить. Какая нафиг разница, ты будешь исполнять фиг знает что от фиг знает кого на первом шаге или на втором? Если тебя захотят поимет

💯172🤩20😁17👍11👎9🤔65🤡5

Signed Nikita Prokopov

6 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC≈11,400 views281 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Один мегабайт это сколько? 1 000 000 байт? Или 1 048 576? Как любой настоящий программист, я всю жизнь принципиально считал, что второе. Что в килобайте 1024 байта, в мегабайте 1024 килобайта и так далее. Степени двойки, да? Мы же инженеры, больше понимаем, о чем говорим, знаем историю, бла-бла-бла. 1000 в компьютере не значит ничего, ни на что не делится, и так далее. А как тогда обозначить 1000 байт? Есть ли отде

💯17248👍25😁17🤡8🎅6🗿2👨‍💻1

Signed Nikita Prokopov

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @nikitonsky_pub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,086 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 134,740
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Hacker News

This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Стой под стрелой” (@nikitonsky_pub), 11,790 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikitonsky_pub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.