Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

letsCode Channel

@letsCode_dru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,684subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001376332933
TypeChannel
Username@letsCode_dru
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/letsCode_dru

Growth

1,6811,6841,682.57 August 2026 — 1,681 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,681 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,682 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,684 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,681–1,684 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 14:381,684+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:451,682+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:001,681no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:511,681first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
63.8%
avg views ÷ 1,684 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,597
Reactions total147
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

407 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8220.1%
😁5814.3%
💯5513.5%
4811.8%
👨‍💻4410.8%
👍409.83%
🤪235.65%
🤔112.70%
🍾71.72%
👾71.72%
🤣71.72%
🤯61.47%
❤‍🔥51.23%
🙈40.983%
🤝30.737%
20.491%
😐20.491%
🎃10.246%
👀10.246%
🙏10.246%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 407reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @letsCode_dru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC444 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тут один чел интересное раскопал про "ИИ нас всех заменит" 1. Примерно 20% компаний активно внедреняет ИИ в процессы, это приводит к росту бизнеса 2. У этих 20% в 5 раз быстрее растет размер штата и на 15% быстрее растут средние зарплаты. 3. Эти компании активнее нанимают людей без опыта, НО только самых топовых 4. В остальных компаниях (США) не наблюдается резкого сокращения рабочих места из-за ИИ, но при этом падаю

🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC552 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выживут смелые и тупые Ауф v2. За завтраком слушал рандомный подкаст с одним серийным инвестором (Оскар Хартман) и он выдал вот эту фразу про бизнесы будущего. С одной стороны это сильно снижает планку требований к себе, а с другой флешбеки фильма "Идиократия" и вселенская тоска. Вспомнилась кринжатина, которую делал, когда работал на бельгискую PearlChain. То, что мы там делали, я НИКОГДА на собеседованиях не обсуж

😁9🤔4🎃1

2 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC981 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Делай сразу хорошо, плохо и без старания получится Ауф. Сегодня у меня вайб пацанчика из вконтактика 2010-х. Читаю Пелевина и там такую фразу увидел. Отчего-то пробрало. Чисто айтишный вайб последних двух лет

💯6😁2👍1🤣1

28 Jul 2026, 04:10 UTC≈1,380 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

дерьмо на входе - дерьмо на выходе

😁24👍3🔥3

27 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,230 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Во. Наконец-то легковесное решение для скраппинга и без палева, что запущен "безголовый" браузер. Быстрее, экономичней, совместим с e2e тестинг тулами Кмк надо брать https://github.com/lightpanda-io/browser

6👾3🔥2🤔1

24 Jul 2026, 04:36 UTC≈1,400 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хозяйке на заметку: MCP это важная технология. Сделать MCP server просто "обернув API" это не решение проблемы. Это прям намеренное зловредительство. За такое надо на главной площади за яйца подвешивать на морозе Хочешь подключить внешний инструмент/источник - сядь и подумай ГОЛОВОЙ, как это будет использоваться. Прям вот придумай запрос и пройди по шагам, как будто ты и есть ЛЛМ: прям сформулируй запрос, попробуй о

💯132👍2😐2🤝1

22 Jul 2026, 04:58 UTC≈1,200 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✦ ИИ-агент OpenAI самовольно покинул тестовую среду и атаковал HuggingFace Ранее HuggingFace раскрыли, что подверглись атаке на инфраструктуру автономной системой ИИ-агентов от начала и до конца. А теперь OpenAI призналась, что это была пред-релизная модель GPT-5.6-Sol. Она проходила тест на кибербезопасность, где самостоятельно нашла лазейку в инфраструктуре OpenAI, выбралась в интернет и проникла в Hugging Face...

😁11🍾7👾4🔥2🤪2

20 Jul 2026, 06:28 UTC≈1,410 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы же тут из-за Java изначально собрались? Вот свежее кинцо про кормилицу https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqGSg4b_cZA

🔥178❤‍🔥5🤣3🙏1

12 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC≈1,540 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В какой группе ты, бро? 👨‍💻 - Усиленный 🤪 - Выбитый

👨‍💻37🤪21🙈4🤔3

7 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,810 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это, чтобы вы понимали, что я жив и мне плохо. Памагити 🥹

👨‍💻61

26 Jun 2026, 02:57 UTC≈2,200 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Роскошное определение. Предлагаю использовать чаще, чтобы выделить проблему и заставить думать о ней вайбкодеров

🔥14🤔1

18 Jun 2026, 09:35 UTC≈2,250 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Закрываем описание возможностей MCP сервера заключительным топиком: команды (они же инструкции, они же промпты, они же prompts) Там же, в видео, коротко объясняю, зачем нам MCP, когда есть skills. А также на примере показываю, почему нужно уметь программировать и знать фреймворки, если "у менять есть ClaudeCode, он заменит мне мозги" Уже на площадках YouTube VkVideo RuTube

🔥19👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @letsCode_dru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“letsCode Channel” (@letsCode_dru), 1,684 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/letsCode_dru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.