Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🤖 The Bell Tech

Channel

🤖 The Bell Tech

@Bell_tech

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,844subscribers

+507 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001215080922
TypeChannel
Username@Bell_tech
DescriptionКак технологии влияют на нашу жизнь и бизнес. Автор канала и рассылки @lerapozychanyuk Редакционный канал The Bell: @thebell_io Реклама: [email protected] Связь: [email protected] Подписка на рассылку The Bell.Tech: https://subscription.thebell.site/tech
Created4 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bell_tech

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Bell_tech/5786 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 14:01 UTC@thebell_invest/218152 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC1.0034 minutes
@thebell_invest/218233 Nov 2026, 18:01 UTC@Bell_tech/5791 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 18:09 UTC1.008 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@thebell_io46 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0018 minutesthis entry (36–10)
@thebell_invest9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0039 minutesthis entry (7–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 109 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @thebell_invest. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

20,31020,85020,58020,8445 August 202610 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 97 days, net +507. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,229–20,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 11:1620,844-6
8 Nov 2026, 20:4520,850+2
7 Nov 2026, 13:4620,848+1
6 Nov 2026, 15:0020,847+5
5 Nov 2026, 17:3420,842+6
4 Nov 2026, 20:5620,836+9
3 Nov 2026, 20:5620,827+14
2 Nov 2026, 19:5820,813+12
1 Nov 2026, 20:3520,801-1
31 Oct 2026, 18:4920,802+2
30 Oct 2026, 18:4020,800-6
28 Oct 2026, 20:1820,806-7
27 Oct 2026, 22:1720,813-12
26 Oct 2026, 00:1520,825-4
24 Oct 2026, 21:4020,829-7
23 Oct 2026, 22:3720,836-2
23 Oct 2026, 00:3920,838+9
22 Oct 2026, 01:1620,829+25
20 Oct 2026, 22:4620,804+2
19 Oct 2026, 20:2920,802first reading

Engagement

109 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.2%
avg views ÷ 20,844 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,300
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.223%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 109 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held109 (27 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total379,450
Reactions total848
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 03:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈473
Videos
≈63
Links
≈5,160

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,934 reactions across 103 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤47224.4%
👍24612.7%
🤣1638.43%
🤯1497.70%
😁1467.55%
🤔975.02%
🔥874.50%
🌚834.29%
🥴804.14%
👀653.36%
😐562.90%
🌭402.07%
😱371.91%
🤨261.34%
🥱241.24%
🍾211.09%
🍓190.982%
👌150.776%
🤩140.724%
⚡130.672%
15 further kinds814.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,059 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (16.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈16,700 views25 reactionsread 11 November 2026

«Яндекс» признал безвозвратную потерю почти 3% данных в Yandex Cloud после атак на дата-центры НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ «Яндекс» после атак на дата-центры смог вернуть доступ к 97,16% клиентских данных в Yandex Cloud, говорится в заявлении компании. Оставшиеся 2,84% нельзя восстановить «из-за …

😐16👍5❤2🔥1🤔1

10 Nov 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,750 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Техновторник: десятина с дата-центров, акционеры судятся с Nvidia, ​​Anthropic снижает аппетиты НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ — Стали известны подробности того, как будет работать указ Путина об обязательном 10%-ном резервировании дата-центров под ресурсы из «белого списка». Резерв нужно обеспечить…

❤4👍4

10 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC≈2,870 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Как будет работать указ Путина о резервировании 10% мощностей дата-центров под «белые списки» НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL, ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ Указ президента об обязательном 10%-ном резервировании дата-центров под «поддержку функционирования информационных ресурсов» вышел 2 ноября — менее чем через месяц после укра…

🌚10⚡3🤯3❤2😁2

9 Nov 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,540 views21 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Как роман главы Nvidia превратился в шпионский скандал НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ Глава Nvidia Дженсен Хуанг признался в супружеской измене — после того как СМИ сообщили, что его роман с топ-менеджером сингапурской компании-клиента может быть операцией китайской разведки. Совет директоров Nvidia…

🍓15😐6

9 Nov 2026, 15:44 UTC≈15,600 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Серверы раздора: как дата-центры стали политической проблемой в США НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ Дональд Трамп называл протесты против дата-центров в США «больным заговором», выгодным только Китаю, и предупреждал, что города, которые от них отказываются, будут «отсталыми и бедными». Но американцев…

❤1

9 Nov 2026, 09:40 UTC≈3,190 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Технопонедельник: взлом Росстата, проблемы Beget, шпионский скандал в Nvidia набирает обороты НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ — Хакеры утверждают, что взломали базы данных Росстата и достали из них подтвержденные свидетельствами о смерти военные потери. Итоговая цифра — 450 тысяч человек, без учета н…

❤3🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC≈19,700 views26 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Обвал ИИ-сектора угрожает IPO Anthropic НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ Потенциальные инвесторы все больше склоняются к тому, что один из «китов» отрасли искусственного интеллекта, Anthropic, не успеет провести IPO в ноябре, пишет Reuters. Начинать роуд-шоу, намеченное на следующую неделю, в контекс…

🤔8🤩6🍾3😱3❤2🌚2🤣1😁1

6 Nov 2026, 09:39 UTC≈4,030 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Технопятница: крупнейшая ИИ-распродажа на американском рынке, проблемы с IPO Anthropic и спорная статистика трафика в рунете НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL, ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ — Американский рынок пережил крупнейшую распродажу со времен тарифов в апреле 2025 года: в четверг Nasdaq Composite упал на 5,5%, а компании из…

❤5🔥5💋3👍1

6 Nov 2026, 08:59 UTC≈17,900 views22 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Владелец Т-Банка покупает «Циан» НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ Материнская компания Т-Банка — «Т-Технологии» — анонсировала планы о покупке от 50% до 100% акций сервиса объявлений о недвижимости «Циан». Ожидается, что сделку закроют в первом квартале 2027 года. Добровольное предложение «Т-Технолог…

🤨8👀7🌚3🥴3❤1

5 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC≈3,470 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @thebell_investPhoto

Через час встречаемся на вебинаре The Bell.Invest «С чего начать инвестировать» — вы еще успеваете присоединиться! НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ Сегодня в 18:00 CET (20:00 МСК) The Bell.Invest проведет вебинар для тех, кто только начинает инвестировать за рубежом. Рассказать об основах мы пригласил…

👨‍💻2❤1🥰1

5 Nov 2026, 11:24 UTC≈19,000 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Серый рынок доступа к Claude и другим зарубежным нейросетям в России вырос до 100–150 млн рублей в месяц НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ В конце 2025 года ИП, которые перепродают российскому бизнесу доступ к зарубежным ИИ-моделям через китайских посредников, почти не встречались. К августу их стало о…

🌚16🤯6👍5❤2

5 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC≈3,470 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Техночетверг: планы OpenAI на биржу, серый рынок ИИ в России и ограничения на токены в Apple НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL, ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ — OpenAI намерена выйти на биржу в 2027 году, а большая часть ее выручки теперь приходится на корпоративные продажи, подтвердил Грег Брокман. Еще в августе финансовый директор…

❤11👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @Bell_tech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Bell_tech edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,097
#1
The Edinorog 🦄
@Theedinorogblog · 44,082
#2
aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 175,172
#3
БлоGнот
@blognot · 13,427
#4
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 103,748
#5
Это Осетинская!
@osetinskayaliza · 17,645
#6
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,540
#7
Важные истории
@istories_media · 125,726
#8
Roskomsvoboda
@roskomsvoboda · 40,498
#9
Колезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,175
#10
Roem.ru
@roemru · 3,865
#11
addmeto
@addmeto · 72,001
#12
42 секунды
@ftsec · 19,385
#13
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,116,844
#14
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,736
#15
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#16
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,144
#17
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 865,039
#18
Bell.Инвестиции
@thebell_invest · 15,384
#19
Denis Sexy IT 🤖
@denissexy · 140,753
#20
Нецифровая экономика
@antidigital · 24,491
#21
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 913,555
#22
ТЕХНО: Яндекс про технологии
@techno_yandex · 218,569
#23
RationalAnswer | Павел Комаровский
@RationalAnswer · 110,207
#24
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 388,911
#25
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 299,577
#26
Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 62,560
#27
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 98,339
#28
ЗаТелеком 🌐
@zatelecom · 64,510
#29
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,444
#30
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 81,254
#31
Rozetked
@rozetked · 646,921
#32
Дизраптор
@disruptors_official · 72,494
#33
Вастрик.Клуб
@vas3k_club · 11,302
#34
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 368,836
#35
Лентач
@lentachold · 391,588
#36
Минцифры России
@mintsifry · 232,434
#37
Грокс
@groks · 42,476
#38
Forbes Russia
@forbesrussia · 235,497
#39
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,233
#40
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 664,380
#41
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 341,015
#42
Алексей Пивоваров
@Alexey_Pivo_varov · 304,377
#43
Faridaily
@faridaily24 · 62,351
#44
PLUSHEV/ПЛЮЩЕВ
@PlushevChannel · 97,956
#45
Русский венчур
@rusven · 24,986
#46
The Moscow Times | Independent news from Russia since 1992
@moscowtimes_ru · 126,635
#47
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 79,175
#48
Коммерсантъ
@kommersant · 295,286
#49
Продакты не нужны
@betternotworse · 28,396
#50
Forbes Russia | The Globals
@forbesglobalrus · 23,106
#51
Время Валеры
@cryptovalerii · 32,080
#52
Ваня Замесин
@zamesin · 50,097
#53
No Flame No Game
@proproduct · 38,615
#54
Радиорубка Лихачёва
@niketasfm · 12,271
#55
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного
@aioftheday · 44,602
#56
EDU
@ProductsAndStartups · 15,345
#57
Утечки информации
@dataleak · 117,768
#58
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 133,380
#59
Т—Ж
@t_jrnl · 98,089
#60
На Zzzzzападном фронте без перемен
@ve4niyvoy · 112,484
#61
MMI
@russianmacro · 101,987
#62
Медиазона
@mediazzzona · 164,621
#63
Т-Инвестиции
@tb_invest_official · 521,159
#64
proVenture (проВенчур)
@proventure · 18,610
#65
The Insider
@theinsider · 152,865
#66
Венчур в картинках
@ventureinpics · 11,272
#67
Эшер II. A+
@usher2 · 16,550
#68
Цифровые экосистемы
@heads_ecosystem · 9,109
#69
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 468,077
#70
Frank Media
@frank_media · 32,153
#71
Новая газета Европа
@novaya_europe · 117,136
#72
Media Rare
@media_rare · 29,025
#73
Минута в минуту
@minutavminutu · 167,164
#74
Daily Reminder
@justakindreminder · 36,340
#75
GoPractice!
@gopractice · 29,393
#76
Connectable Jobs
@zarubezhom_jobs · 106,423
#77
commit -m "better"
@itpgchannel · 4,102
#78
Вёрстка
@svobodnieslova · 112,555
#79
Boletskaya
@ksenyaboletskaya · 11,017
#80
bitkogan
@bitkogan · 257,290
#81
Хабр
@habr_com · 134,497
#82
Алексей Кудрин
@AlekseiKudrin · 6,932
#83
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 124,951
#84
Kedr to Earth | Земля, я Кедр
@kedr2earth · 10,140
#85
Шмит16
@Shmit16 · 17,608
#86
Дудь
@yurydud · 849,220
#87
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,057
#88
Банкста
@banksta · 439,838
#89
Яндекс
@yandex · 601,037
#90
YDEX
@ydex_forinvestors · 15,153
#91
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 462,080
#92
DTF
@dtfbest · 57,966
#93
Альфа-Банк
@alfabank · 981,016
#94
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 794,552
#95
Полный беспилот
@polnybespilot · 2,393
#96
Daily Geek News
@daily_geek_news · 5,742
#97

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,097
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
42 секунды
@ftsec · 19,385
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 October 2026
TechSparks
@techsparks · 46,736
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Tech Crunch
@techcrunchru · 16,299
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
Ozon HQ
@ozonhq · 30,765
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
addmeto
@addmeto · 72,001
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
Нецифровая экономика
@antidigital · 24,491
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
запуск завтра
@ctodaily · 33,711
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🤖 The Bell Tech” (@Bell_tech), 20,844 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bell_tech.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.