Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Авва

Channel

Авва

@avvablog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,959subscribers

+195 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387922513
TypeChannel
Username@avvablog
DescriptionЧат на @avvablog_chat, прямая связь @avorobey
Created2 January 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/avvablog

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,75210,95910,855.56 August 202610 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 97 days, net +195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,721–10,990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 23:4010,959+2
9 Nov 2026, 09:1510,957+13
7 Nov 2026, 23:1810,944+5
5 Nov 2026, 22:0010,939+1
4 Nov 2026, 19:2010,938+2
3 Nov 2026, 17:0410,936+8
2 Nov 2026, 14:5910,928+7
1 Nov 2026, 12:4710,921-2
31 Oct 2026, 10:4510,923+2
30 Oct 2026, 13:4910,921-2
29 Oct 2026, 11:5910,923-1
28 Oct 2026, 08:0710,924-6
27 Oct 2026, 06:2710,930+2
26 Oct 2026, 09:1410,928-2
25 Oct 2026, 06:3610,930+2
24 Oct 2026, 07:2610,928-4
23 Oct 2026, 06:5810,932-3
22 Oct 2026, 07:5510,935-10
21 Oct 2026, 01:5010,945-6
20 Oct 2026, 01:5710,951first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.8%
avg views ÷ 10,959 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,890
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
25
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held59 (10 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total172,150
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈619
Videos
≈38
Links
≈1,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 08s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 09:32 UTC≈3,700 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Один из последних выпусков комикса "Peanuts" Чарльза Шульца, выходившего ежедневно почти 50 лет. Он был опубликован через два месяца после того, как у Шульца неожиданно нашли терминальную стадию рака, через 19 дней после того, как он объявил о грядущем окончании комикса, и за 41 день до его смерти.

5 Nov 2026, 19:32 UTC≈4,220 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

На концерте БГ не за границей, не в столице, а прямо у себя в родном городе, странно и и приятно!

5 Nov 2026, 10:52 UTC≈4,370 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Над этой диаграммой спорят до хрипа в израильском сообществе водителей. У кого преимущество? Обе дороги одинакового статуса, никаких знаков нет. Оказывается, по израильскому закону у красной машины преимущество (она справа). Честно скажу, что я на месте красной уступаю тому, кто прямо едет, и другое мне кажется извращением (если бы красная поворачивала влево, то другое дело, само собой). Ну закон скажете, закон. Хо…

5 Nov 2026, 09:57 UTC≈4,510 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

"Разве непонятно? Человечество - это и есть бесконечное количество обезьян. И каждый день мы выдаем бесконечное количество слов. И один из нас уже написал «Гамлета»."

5 Nov 2026, 08:47 UTC≈4,430 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

После всей этой политики - немного умиротворения и спокойствия вам в ленту.

5 Nov 2026, 01:15 UTC≈4,380 viewsread 11 November 2026

В целом доволен результатами выборов в США. Не верил, что демократы возьмут Сенат, рад, что ошибался. Было бы еще лучше, если бы обошлось без победы Абдула Эль-Сайеда, но и так хорошо. Победа в Сенате означает конец судейским назначениям Трампа - и в Верховном суде, если вдруг откроется вакансия (что, впрочем, маловероятно), но главное, в федеральных судах. Она означает, что обе палаты Конгресса смогут совместно рас…

3 Nov 2026, 18:38 UTC≈4,600 viewsread 11 November 2026

Вопрос к тем, кто следит за выборами в Америке (в Конгресс, некоторых губернаторов итд.): 1) На что вы надеетесь? 2) Что, по-вашему, случится?

1 Nov 2026, 18:33 UTC≈6,900 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Забавный стишок про 10 отличий в двух копиях его. Перевод Константина Кнопа. Надо сказать, что я довольно долго искал отличия, и если бы не помощь зоркой Р., так и остался бы, возможно, с 9 отличиями из 10 как в оригинале, так и в переводе. Теперь предлагаю и вам помучиться!

1 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC≈6,770 viewsread 11 November 2026

Есть определенный доверительный стиль обращения к читателю-энциклопедисту, знающему все цитаты, узнающему все аллюзии... Я читаю сейчас воспоминания Григория Кружкова ("Записки переводчика-рецидивиста", 2023). Только начал, но судя по всему, замечательная книга. Вчера открыл ее на случайной странице в середине и в глаза бросилась фраза: "Помните, у Теофиля Готье --"

31 Oct 2026, 11:08 UTC≈10,800 viewsread 11 November 2026

Забавная задачка, которую можно решить несколькими способами, подсмотрена в твиттере. Стандартную колоду из 52 карт тасуют, так что карты в случайном порядке, и начинают выкладывать по одной. После того, как выложен первый туз, смотрим на следующую карту. Что более вероятно - что это туз червей или двойка пик?

29 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC≈8,180 viewsread 11 November 2026

Забавная задачка, не сложная, но нужно подумать. Перед вами пять роботов, у них каждого на голове дисплей, на котором число. Сейчас на роботах числа 1,2,3,4,5. У каждого робота есть кнопка. Если нажать на нее, то число этого робота исчезает, а вместо него появляется среднее арифметическое четырех остальных роботов. Среднее арифметическое считается точно (включая дроби). Нажимать можно на кнопки любых роботов в любом…

28 Oct 2026, 22:58 UTC≈8,200 viewsread 11 November 2026

Господи, дай мне силу духа увидеть, что это уже не мой цирк, мужество управлять теми обезьянами, что у меня остались, и мудрость, чтобы понимать разницу между тем и этим.

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @avvablog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ряды Фурье
@Fourier_series · 43,923
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
Лингвошутки
@lingvojokes · 21,379
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Мозг на полную
@full_brains · 23,167
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
Доктор Утин
@doctorutin · 24,617
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 16 September 2026
baunovhaus
@baunovhaus · 35,618
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Армен и Фёдор
@armenifedor · 41,805
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Мастриды
@mustreads · 44,968
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
addmeto
@addmeto · 72,001
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
Алексей Наумов. Внешпол
@vneshpol · 21,194
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Техасский Вестник
@starbasepost · 19,255
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 October 2026
запуск завтра
@ctodaily · 33,704
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД
@whalesgohigh · 61,504
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Fixed.One: новости мира Apple и не только…
@FixedOneNews · 20,974
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
Безвольные каменщики
@kamenschiki · 56,691
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Авва” (@avvablog), 10,959 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avvablog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.