Так, щас спокойно, но я сходил на подкаст. Вот тут его можно посмотреть либо послушать: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koxrYhdUMs8
custom 541837820057513453383custom 541823283311203407570custom 541819243464965000014custom 541792982746426836313

Channel
@v_beowulf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,046subscribers
+924 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001242111420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @v_beowulf |
| Description | Канал об английском языке. 18+ Сайты школы: https://go.beowulf.school/vb https://go.battle4britain.com/b4b Записаться на занятия — @vb1066 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/VirginiaBeowulf №5231355778 |
| Created | 13 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/v_beowulf |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:42 | 40,046 | +188 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 39,858 | +57 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 39,801 | +59 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 39,742 | +40 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 39,702 | +45 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 39,657 | +29 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 39,628 | +95 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 39,533 | +17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:48 | 39,516 | +26 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 39,490 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 39,489 | +25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 39,464 | +23 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 39,441 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 39,431 | +9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 39,422 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 39,433 | +31 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:11 | 39,402 | +14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 39,388 | +10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 39,378 | +22 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 39,356 | first reading |
57 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 57 (10 July 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 275,550 |
| Reactions total | 5,690 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15,030 reactions across 57 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5418232833112034075 | 10,528 | 70.0% | |
| custom 5417929827464268363 | 1,646 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5418378200575134533 | 1,588 | 10.6% | |
| custom 5418192434649650000 | 1,268 | 8.44% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,030 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так, щас спокойно, но я сходил на подкаст. Вот тут его можно посмотреть либо послушать: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koxrYhdUMs8
custom 541837820057513453383custom 541823283311203407570custom 541819243464965000014custom 541792982746426836313
Правильный ответ на загадку из предыдущего поста: не ошибся норвежец. А вот из каких языков пришли те самые пять ошибок: 1. "Yesterday I go to school" – китайский. Без ошибки: "Yesterday I went to school" – "Вчера я ходил в школу". В китайском глаголы не изменяются по временам, поэтому его носители склонны и в английском использовать одну форму: сегодня GO, вчера GO, завтра GO. 2. "How is it called?" – русский. Б…
custom 5418232833112034075244custom 541792982746426836331custom 541819243464965000021custom 541837820057513453310
Приходят на урок английского русский, немец и француз... А также финн, норвежец и китаец. Получают контрольные – и почти у всех ошибка. Только одна работа без единого косяка (what a nerdy guy!). Итого: 6 студентов, 5 ошибок. Известно, что все ошибки они притащили из своих родных языков. Из серии: I very love you = калька с русского "Я очень люблю тебя". А теперь загадка. Кто всё сделал правильно? Раскидайте ошибк…
custom 5418232833112034075116custom 541837820057513453316custom 541792982746426836312custom 54181924346496500007
Вот что бы вы сделали, если бы мама и папа дали вам имя Батт?.. А человек с таким именем, между прочим, был. Царствовал в Древней Греции, основал город, а, по легенде, из его непотребного имени лингвисты сделали своего рода бренд. Ввели термин "баттология" – ненужное избыточное повторение повторяющихся слов, одинаковых по смыслу. Или скопление одинаковых слогов: Рыбы бы было больше; До "Додо-пиццы"; Как тебе Бебе…
custom 5418232833112034075127custom 541837820057513453329custom 541792982746426836317custom 541819243464965000010
БЕЛАЯ ВОРОНА = BLACK SHEEP. И то, и другое – про резко выделяющуюся в социуме личность (с неодобрением). А вот раньше... Раньше быть белой вороной было даже хорошо. Хотя чёрной овцой – с самого начала было не очень. ················ ⚪️ Фраза белая ворона – изначально про большую редкость. Римский поэт-сатирик Ювенал описал этой фразой невероятно редкий успех: Рок дает царства рабам, доставляет пленным триумфы. Вп…
custom 5418232833112034075187custom 541792982746426836334custom 541837820057513453317custom 541819243464965000011
Есть слова "два, три", а есть "двОЕ, трОЕ, четверО". Не объяснить с ходу разницу, но все её чувствуют. ·················· Английский язык такого бонуса лишен, но в нём всё же есть альтернативная форма слова two – "TWAIN". Само собой, устаревшая: • But the warm twilight round us TWAIN will never rise again. • When the masked stranger hew with his axe, the baker's head did split in TWAIN. С этим словом связан псевд…
custom 5418232833112034075273custom 541819243464965000054custom 541792982746426836330custom 541837820057513453322
Ответ к опросу из предыдущего поста: "Мне бы сейчас очень пригодился кофе". • COULD DO WITH something – нуждаться в чём-то или хотеть этого. • I could do with a snack. ≈ Перекусить бы. • We could do with a little help. ≈ Помощь нам бы очень пригодилась. • This room could do with a coat of paint. ≈ Эту комнату перекрасить не помешало бы. ·················· Можно и наоборот: • COULD DO WITHOUT something – не хотет…
custom 5418232833112034075375custom 541837820057513453353custom 541792982746426836326custom 541819243464965000023
Posted without readable text
custom 541837820057513453366custom 541823283311203407544custom 541819243464965000015custom 54179298274642683639
Posted without readable text
custom 5418232833112034075392custom 541792982746426836360custom 541837820057513453342custom 541819243464965000031
Когда тянет перевести дословно, но это так не работает. • It occurred to me ✅ "мне пришло в голову", ❌ а не "случилось со мной". • Hear, hear! ✅ "вот именно, поддерживаю!", ❌ а не "услышь". • Give me a break ✅ "ну прямо уж, да хорош уже", ❌ а не "дай мне перерыв". • Leave me alone ✅ "оставь меня в покое", ❌ а не "оставь меня в одиночестве". • I wouldn’t know ✅ "понятия не имею, откуда мне знать", ❌ а не "я бы не…
custom 5418232833112034075278custom 541792982746426836344custom 541819243464965000023custom 541837820057513453319
У нас новое видео. Смотреть можно тут (клик).
custom 5418232833112034075237custom 541837820057513453346custom 541819243464965000019custom 541792982746426836316
Все побежали – и я побежал... (Попытка номер 2. Карта с розами вас сильно путает – уберём от греха подальше.) Если ещё не видели, вот занимательный тест. Проверьте ваш словарный запас в нескольких языках сразу. Навыки в компаративистике – тоже проверьте. Давайте мериться результатами. P. S. Представлены русский, украинский, польский, чешский, греческий, нидерландский, немецкий, шведский, французский, итальянский, …
custom 5418232833112034075188custom 541792982746426836322custom 541819243464965000013custom 54183782005751345338
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @v_beowulf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@v_beowulf edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Virginia Bēowulf | английский язык” (@v_beowulf), 40,046 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/v_beowulf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.