Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 46 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 100 days, net -187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,320–10,564 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 08:54
10,349
+1
11 Nov 2026, 13:17
10,348
-1
9 Nov 2026, 19:01
10,349
-3
8 Nov 2026, 07:17
10,352
+2
7 Nov 2026, 00:25
10,350
-3
5 Nov 2026, 22:54
10,353
-1
5 Nov 2026, 00:35
10,354
-6
4 Nov 2026, 03:06
10,360
-8
2 Nov 2026, 23:26
10,368
-1
1 Nov 2026, 20:06
10,369
-3
31 Oct 2026, 20:28
10,372
-3
29 Oct 2026, 23:05
10,375
-1
29 Oct 2026, 01:40
10,376
-2
28 Oct 2026, 02:26
10,378
-2
27 Oct 2026, 02:30
10,380
-4
25 Oct 2026, 22:51
10,384
+3
24 Oct 2026, 22:37
10,381
-4
23 Oct 2026, 20:25
10,385
-4
22 Oct 2026, 19:41
10,389
-3
21 Oct 2026, 16:08
10,392
first reading
Engagement
107 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.54%
avg views ÷ 10,349 subscribers
Avg views / post
780
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
48
of 107 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
107 (13 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
37,437
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 11:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,780
Videos
≈275
Links
≈728
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7m 46s
Average length
1m 33s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
في الصف السادس صلى الجمعة بجانبي فرأيته يقرأ سورة الكهف، فقلت له : لم تقرأ سورة الكهف؟ فقال لي : سنة جاءت عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم، فقلت له : من أعلمك بهذا ؟ فقال : معلم التربية الإسلامية. فهل يدري هذا المعلم اليوم ما صنع في طالبه من خير؟ وما صنع لنفسه من أثر ؟
يا أيها المعلمون : لا تطنوا أن آثاركم تبليها الأيام، أو يطولها زمن النسيان، فدونكم الإخلاص والتركيز .
قلت له حدثني عن أدهش أيامك، وألذ لحظات قلبك، وأعذب فصول حياتك، فقال لي يا صديقي ؛: ما رأيت أجمل ولا أدهش ولا أعظم من ورد القرآن الذي تجري فصوله على لساني ولا أحتاج فيه إلى مصحف أنظر فيه، ولو رأيت أفراحي في نهاية الشهر وقد انتهيت من أربع ختمات لأدركت ما أحدثك عنه! فأما إذا ما تذكرت أول ليلة القبر وهو في جوفي، واللحظة التي يقال فيها (يقال لقارئ القرآن اقرأ وارتق في درجات الجنة، ورتّل كما كنت ترتل في الدنيا فإن منزلتك ع…
لو أنك فعّلت هذا المفهوم من قول نبيك صلى الله عليه وسلم (من حسن إسلام المرء تركه ما لا يعنيه) في سائر جوارحك لرأيت من سكينة قلبك وطمأنينة روحك وأنس مشاعرك ما لا عهد لك به البتة، فدونك التجربة وسيحدثك قلبك عن الرواء الذي عاشه والحياة التي خاضها في رحاب معانيه.
النظر للحرام ليس مجرد معصية عابرة تقع في لحظة من الزمن وإنما هي بداية لسلسة من التحولات الخفية في القلب تبدأ بحرمان اللذة، وثقل الطاعة، وفوات البركة والتوفيق وتنتهي بصاحبها إلى التنازل عن القيم التي كان يؤمن بها، والتخلي عن الطريق من أصله، وهاتفك المحمول اليوم يتفنن في تدريبك على إلف الصورة المحرمة بطرق فائقة التأثير حتى لا تكاد تأنف الحرام مع كثرته وعظم خطره.
الحديث عن خطر الجوال والوصية بعزله في مرات ليس للحفاظ على وقتك فحسب، وإنما دعوة لراحة بالك واستقرار نفسك وطمأنينة روحك، فإن فوضى الصورة والصوت في مرات كثيرة أعظم أسباب قلقك وحرمانك من التوفيق وفوات البركة من عمرك، وكم من أزمات تحيط بك من آثارها ، والله المستعان!
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @mashal001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
واحة القرآن عادل الجندي @wahaQuR · 33,048 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
- هدايات الحُفَّاظ ... @hdaaayat · 31,632 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
قناة هَنَــــاء الماضي @Hanaa577 · 29,308 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
متمُّ نورِه @yasser_alhozimey · 43,817 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
رسائل زوجية @axxxxa140 · 67,146 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
ياسر الحزيمي 🎙 @ybh_100 · 94,130 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
د. عقيل سالم الشمري @tadabr2 · 31,420 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Excel & Data analysis @Free_Excel · 38,045 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 31 August 2026
حــــنـــان فـــــؤاد @HananFoad · 24,422 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
الطريق إلى القرآن @e_fnan · 27,671 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 September 2026
قناة جيل يقرأ @ReadTube · 28,799 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
صناعة حفّاظ القرآن - د.سعيد حمزة @saidhamza2023 · 33,425 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 5 September 2026
قناة الدكتور أحمد خليل خيرالله @drahmedkhairala2 · 59,549 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
أَرحنا بِها يَا بِلال | Comfort us with it, O BILAL @alraahwalslaah · 21,334 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
قناة آفاق النسائية @MINASA_AFAQ · 48,143 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
المهندس علاء حامد Alaa Hamed @Alaa_Hamed1 · 166,232 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026
ثلاثون ثانية @Thirty_s30 · 27,777 Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“( بوح )” (@mashal001), 10,349 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mashal001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
