Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for كاتب وكتاب

Channel

كاتب وكتاب

@katib_kitab

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,232subscribers

+426 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001079505436
TypeChannel
Username@katib_kitab
Descriptionمبادرة من مؤسسة رسيل المسار لتسهيل القراءة في الكتب العقدية والفكرية المعاصرة.. للتواصل: [email protected] منصتنا: https://kkitab.com/ حسابنا في التويتر: Katib_Kitab
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/katib_kitab

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7847,2597,021.56 August 2026 — 6,806 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,803 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,806 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,803 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,802 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,803 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,802 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,798 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,789 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,788 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,784 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,788 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,790 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,242 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,256 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,259 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,253 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,251 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,248 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,245 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,241 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,237 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,238 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,234 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,233 subscribers11 November 2026 — 7,232 subscribers7,2326 August 202611 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 97 days, net +426. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,713–7,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 09:587,232-1
7 Nov 2026, 16:107,233-1
4 Nov 2026, 16:377,234-4
1 Nov 2026, 18:507,238+1
30 Oct 2026, 03:167,237-4
27 Oct 2026, 01:417,241-4
23 Oct 2026, 16:557,245-3
20 Oct 2026, 12:467,248-3
17 Oct 2026, 18:007,251-2
14 Oct 2026, 20:497,253-6
11 Oct 2026, 05:377,259+3
5 Oct 2026, 08:207,256+14
27 Sept 2026, 04:017,242+452
18 Sept 2026, 03:156,790+2
13 Sept 2026, 13:176,788+4
4 Sept 2026, 05:006,784-4
1 Sept 2026, 00:366,788-1
28 Aug 2026, 19:036,789-9
25 Aug 2026, 20:446,798-4
23 Aug 2026, 06:586,802first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.57%
avg views ÷ 7,232 subscribers
Avg views / post
475
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.799%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held47 (4 June 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total12,829
Reactions total90
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
927
Videos
23
Links
854

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

172 reactions across 38 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14785.5%
👍148.14%
👏52.91%
🔥21.16%
😢21.16%
🤩21.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (7.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC110 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🔔 الساعات الأخيرة للتقييم! أحبتنا القراء، نذكركم بقرب انتهاء المدة المحددة للتقييم النهائي لكتاب "العواصم". يُغلق الرابط غداً الخميس (١٢ نوفمبر) الساعة ١٠:٠٠ صباحاً بتوقيت أم القرى. لا تفوتوا فرصة توثيق قراءتكم والحصول على شهادتكم الموقعة من الكاتب. نرجو لكم التوفيق والسداد ✨

❤2😢1

9 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC293 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💡🍃 "شمِّر وثابر واصطبِرْ فالعلمُ محمودُ الأثَر" إليكم #التقييم_النهائي لكتاب📖: العواصم: المقولات الضامنة من الانحرافات الفكرية المعاصرة. 🔗 رابط التقييم النهائي • مدة التقييم: ٧٢ ساعة. • يبدأ: يوم الإثنين في التاسع والعشرين من جمادى الأولى، الموافق ٩ نوفمبر (١٠:٠٠ ص) وينتهي: يوم الخميس في الثاني من جمادى الآخرة الموافق ١٢ نوفمبر الساعة(١٠:٠٠ ص) بتوقيت أم القرى. • لكم الخيار في المشاركة. • الأسئلة موضوعية من ملخ…

❤3

8 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC300 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🍃 #اقتباسات #العواصم

❤5👏1

4 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC530 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

☀️ نضع بين أيديكم كامل المحتوى لهذه الدورة تجدونه على المنصة: 🔗 صفحة كامل المحتوى لكتاب العواصم. 🔗 صوتيات كتاب العواصم. ☀️

❤2

4 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC452 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

لِيهنِكم الختام، وعذب الإنجاز، بعد حثّ الخطى، وتكريس الوقت والجهد🎊✨ بفضل الله ختمنا دورتنا السادسة والثلاثون، بصحبة كتاب: العواصم: المقولات الضامنة من الانحرافات الفكرية المعاصرة. ونعلمكم بموعد #التقييم_النهائي للكتاب لنثبت ما قرأنا وننتفع به؛ والذي سيكون في: ▪️ يوم الإثنين ٢٩ جمادى الأولى ١٤٤٨ هـ الموافق ٩ نوفمبر ٢٠٢٦ م الساعة(١٠ صباحًا) -بتوقيت أم القرى-. ▪️ مدة التقييم ٧٢ ساعة. ▪️ الأسئلة موضوعية، ومن ملخص ا…

❤5👍1

3 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC434 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026

طريقٌ عذبٌ قطعناه سويّة، نسأل الله أن يجعله من العلم النافع الذي يرفع به الدرجات 🍃 أحبتنا إليكم 🔗 المراجعة الإلكترونية السادسة. المراجعة شاملة لما قُرئ هذا الأسبوع، الورد ( ١٦ - ١٧ ) مُتاحة إلى الثلاثاء ٣٠ جمادى الأولى الموافق ١٠ نوفمبر الساعة ١١:٥٩ بتوقيت أم القرى. بارك الله فيكم💛

❤3

3 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTC429 views15 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

​🔴 تنويه مهم لقرّائنا الأعزاء ​نلفت عنايتكم إلى وجود خطأ مطبعي في الصفحة ٤٦٩، حيث سقطت كلمة (كلام) من النص الموضح في الصورة ​❌ النص الحالي: "بأنَّ الله غير مخلوق". ✔️ التصويب: "بأنَّ كلام الله غير مخلوق". ​يُرجى الانتباه لذلك وتعديلها في نسخكم. بُورك في قراءتكم وهمّتكم 🌿

❤11👍4

3 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC430 viewsread 11 November 2026
File

#تعليق_صوتي على الورد السابع عشر من الكاتب الكريم أ. د. فهد العجلان✨

3 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC462 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📗✨ الثلاثاء، الثالث والعشرون من جمادى الأول الموافق 3 نوفمبر. "قليلٌ مِن العلمِ مع العَمل بهِ، أنفعُ مِن كثيرٍ مِن العلمِ مع قِلّة العَمَل بهِ" نقرأ وردنا السابع عشر من كتاب: العواصم: المقولات الضامنة من الانحرافات الفكرية المعاصرة للدكتور فهد العجلان. 🔗 صفحة الورد السابع عشر على المنصة. 🔗 التقييم الدوري للورد السابع عشر. #العواصم ✨

❤2

2 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC431 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🪻 #اقتباسات #العواصم

❤6

1 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC444 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

#تعليق_صوتي على الورد السادس عشر من الكاتب الكريم أ. د. فهد العجلان✨

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @katib_kitab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

​أي هذه الإضافات تعمّق فهمك للكتاب وتجعل قراءتك أمتع؟

  1. ​الشرح الصوتي🎙️69%
  2. ​ملخص الأفكار الرئيسية 📝58%
  3. ​تدوين الاقتباسات ومشاركتها ✍️18%
  4. ​التواصل مع الكاتب 💬29%

The shares total 174%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Jun 2026, 15:24 UTCAnonymous Poll119 voters

أخبرنا ما هو النمط الذي يوافق روتينك القرائي أكثر؟

  1. قراءة بمرونة واستدراك ⚖️68%
  2. قراءة يومية مستمرة 📈24%
  3. القراءة في عطلة الأسبوع ⏳20%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

| اسأل البيضاء |
@ask_albaydha · 32,906
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
نماء - تربية وبناء 📊
@YanabeeTaN · 19,404
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 October 2026
| قناة البيضاء |
@albaydha · 20,941
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
دكتور شريف طه يونس
@SherifTahaYounos · 42,846
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 28 August 2026
فاهم بودكاست
@fahempodcast · 21,986
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
قناة جيل يقرأ
@ReadTube · 28,813
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
إعلانات الدورات والدروس
@CoursesIslam · 54,950
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
منصت
@monsit · 35,014
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
منصت الوحي - الختمة الصوتية للقرآن
@monsit3 · 30,869
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
مكتبة النفس التواقة
@baz_book · 46,217
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
رواسخ
@Rawasekh · 31,575
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
صوتيات د . أحمد عبدالمنعم 🔊
@itsquraan · 105,781
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
هذه سبيلي | القناةالدعوية لأسماءمحمدلبيب
@hatheehi_sabili_asmaa · 28,467
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
يتدارسونه
@yatadarasonah · 32,932
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
برنامج التأهيل الفقهي المالكي
@TahilMaliki · 21,003
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 September 2026
عبدالله الوهيبي
@aalwhebey · 26,981
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
السبيل
@al_sabeel · 23,930
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
التزكية
@ALTazkiah · 21,759
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
تسجيلات دروس رِفقة ||
@rifqahrecordings · 28,445
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
تشويقات قرآنية
@tashweeqatquran · 43,810
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
المعرفة للجميع كتب كندل ‏Kindle
@KindleKotob · 25,257
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
ياسر الحزيمي 🎙
@ybh_100 · 94,130
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
لتهتدوا
@lthtdo · 27,135
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 September 2026
امتدادٌ مُشرق ⛅️
@emtdad3 · 23,274
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“كاتب وكتاب” (@katib_kitab), 7,232 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katib_kitab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.