3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,896–3,967 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 12:22
3,904
-46
8 Aug 2026, 08:41
3,950
-9
7 Aug 2026, 14:17
3,959
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 3,904 subscribers
Avg views / post
597
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
18 (29 June 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
8,359
Reactions total
140
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
178 reactions across 18 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
36
20.2%
👍
25
14.0%
👏
12
6.74%
❤
10
5.62%
💩
9
5.06%
🤡
8
4.49%
❤🔥
7
3.93%
🍾
7
3.93%
👀
6
3.37%
👻
6
3.37%
🖕
5
2.81%
😭
5
2.81%
🙈
5
2.81%
🤬
5
2.81%
🐳
4
2.25%
😱
4
2.25%
🤔
4
2.25%
🌭
3
1.69%
🦄
3
1.69%
🌚
2
1.12%
7 further kinds
12
6.74%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$FRONG
(1) Uniswap의 프로덕트 디자이너 Zack이 곧 출시될 pools.trade 런치패드 랜딩페이지의 에셋이 저장된 Amazon S3 버킷에 frong.mp4라는 영상을 직접 업로드한 것이 확인됨.
(2) 온체인 유저들이 해당 영상을 분석하는 과정에서, 영상 파일명이 "frong"이라는 것을 발견. 이후 여러 사람이 무작위로 다양한 FRONG 티커를 발행하기 시작함.
(3) 이후 Zack이 직접 pools.trade 런치패드에서 $FRONG를 발행한 것이 온체인으로 확인됨.
배포 지갑이 Zack의 ENS 주소와 연결되어 있고,
토큰 생성 트랜잭션에 자신의 X(트위터) 계정 링크까지 포함시켜 사실상 공식적으로 자신의 토큰임을 인증.
이 시점부터 여러 FRONG 토큰 간 경쟁(PvP)은 사실상 종료.
(4) 그 직후 Un…
✅ 지난 24시간 DEX 핵심 요약 (Sauce)
- $FRONG (ATH $10M): 유니스왑 pools.trade 관련 힌트 포스팅 여파로 ATH
- $MarsCoin (ATH $62M): 바이낸스ZH 공지 발 $SPCXB 스냅샷/에어드랍 호재로 ATH
- $CASHCAT (반등세): 익명 고래 대량 매집 포착. 로빈후드 상장 1호 생태계 토큰 기대감
- $Doom ($7.9M 터치): 원작 레벨 디자이너 언급 + 문샷(Moonshot) 인증으로 펌핑
- $ALT ($1.4M 터치): 하이퍼리퀴드 기반 알트펀(AltFun)의 공식 CTO 선언으로 변동성 확대
- $INDEX ($7.4M MC): 더인덱스(TheIndexFi)의 신규 프로덕트 유출 이슈로 거래대금 몰림
요즘 CEX 상장 퍼포먼스도 있긴 하지만, DEX는 꾸준히 …
🎙 Somnia DreamDEX & 원미닛 AMA
Somnia DreamDEX의 앞으로의 방향성과 비젼에 대해 직접 들어볼 수 있는 시간이 될 예정입니다.
- 날짜: 8월 5일 오후8시
- 장소: X (트위터) 스페이스 / 원미닛 텔레그램
- AMA 참여자 보상 : 20만원 상당 기프티콘
AMA 참가자 대상 20만원 상당 기프티콘도 제공합니다!
소소하지만 가볍게 들으면서 기프티콘 받아가세요!
진행 전에 AMA 참가자 구글폼 올리도록 하겠습니다.
➡️ AMA 예약하기
➡️ AMA 참가자 구글폼
AMA 참여 하실분들은 구글폼 먼저 작성하시고 추후 AMA 종료 후 비밀번호 나오면 수정하시면 됩니다!
✅ Extended TGE 임박: FDV 추정 및 관전 포인트
포인트 총수량이 공개 및 에어드랍 기대감으로 관건은 초기 FDV 규모
- 예상 FDV: 파머들의 즉시 던지는 스탠스 및 현재 장세 고려 시 초기 $300M ~ $500M 보수적 런칭 가능성 유력
- 업사이드 키: eToro 시너지 본격화 및 Revolut 등 빅테크/핀테크 파트너십 성사 여부에 따라 $2B+ 상방 가능
볼륨은 줄었지만 꾸준히 딜을 붙이는 팀인 만큼, 초기 저평가 구간 진입 후 핀테크 호재 펌핑을 노리는 전략 유효
#Extended #TGE
✅ KBW2026 with Upbit: 판 키우는 아시아 최대 크립토 컨퍼런스 🇰🇷
올해 KBW는 업비트가 공식 등판하며 국가/제도권, 온체인 자본시장, AI 융합을 핵심 테마로 본격적인 빌드업 착수
- 일정/장소: 2026년 9월 29일 ~ 10월 1일 | 서울 워커힐 호텔앤리조트
- 주요 테마: Crypto Meets the State, Capital Markets On-Chain, AI 융합 등
- 티켓: Select 패스 한정가 $599 오픈
기관 자금 및 제도권 서사가 본격적으로 엮이는 만큼 가을 하반기 장세 핵심 거점으로 주시할 필요 있음
#KBW2026
✅KOSPI 개장 직후 +14% 역대급 폭등
지수 3일 연속 폭락 딛고 장 열리자마자 14% 솟구치며 시총 600조 원(~$400B) 증발했던 거 복구
- 동력: AI 반도체 숏커버링 & 최태원 회장 자사주 수천억 기습 매수 소식 겹치며 하이닉스(+28%), 삼성전자(+26%) 미친 갭상승
레이폴드 파산 시키고 유동성 다시 돌아오나...? 크립토 레이더들도 다 다루는 역대급 코스피 상승인 듯
#코스피
✅ 주식 관련 밈코인 섹터 폭등
전통시장+크립토 테마가 갑자기 주식 관련 밈코인으로... 24시간 평균 +2,609% 폭등 (상승 비중 100%).
주요 코인: Jacket (+47,890%), MarsCoin (+335%)
전통 주식 서사에 유동성이 쏠린 도파민 장세. 고점 물림 주의
#밈코인 #이게RWA?
✅ CZ 한마디: "BSC 밈코인 좀 사볼까?"
CZ가 BSC 밈코인을 테스트 겸 사거나 팔 수 있다고 해서 유동성 쏠림 기대감 고조
- 화력 집결: CZ와 바낸이 밀어주면 BSC 특유의 미친 유동성이 한 번에 쏠림
- 관전 포인트: 언급 한마디에 100배 뛰는 BSC발 도파민 밈장 재개 여부
로빈후드에서 BNB로 유동성 넘어가며 2차 밈코인 시즌 열릴지 주목
#CZ #BSC #밈코인
❤🔥7🎃2🔥2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @trianglelabs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Triangle Web3 공지방” (@trianglelabs), 3,904 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trianglelabs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.