Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 루이 Coinstagram

Channel

루이 Coinstagram

@louiecoinstagram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

117subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002013816299
TypeChannel
Username@louiecoinstagram
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/louiecoinstagram

Growth

1171191187 August 2026 — 119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 119 subscribers9 September 2026 — 118 subscribers16 September 2026 — 117 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 40 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 12:58117-1
9 Sept 2026, 05:19118-1
9 Aug 2026, 04:17119no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:14119first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1773.9%
👍521.7%
🔥14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2025 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Mar 2026, 10:17 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @nftimagod

워뇨띠가 알려주는 리스크관리 심화편 요약정리본 ✍ 1. 중요한 것은 배율이 아니라 자산 노출 많은 사람들이 고배율 = 위험 저배율 = 안전 이라고 생각하지만 실제로 중요한 것은 "전체 자산 중 얼마를 한 번의 판단에 노출했는가" 입니다. 예시 - 고배율이라도 자산 일부만 사용하면 위험은 제한됨 - 저배율이라도 전재산 투입이면 매우 위험 즉 포지션 위험 ≠ 전체 자산 붕괴 위험 2. 리스크는 두 가지로 나뉜다 ① 포지션 위험 - 레버리지 - 청산 가능성 - 포지션 자체 변동성 ② 자산 붕괴 위험 - 전체 자산 중 얼마나 묶였는지 - 추가 증거금 여부 - 손절 규칙 대부분의 사람은 포지션 위험만 보고 자산 붕괴 위험을 무시한다. 3. 진짜 위험한 구조 많은 사람들이 다음 과정으로 망한다. 1) 낮은 배율이라 안심 2) 자

1

10 Nov 2025, 08:55 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @davidanecdotekr

트위터에도 올리긴 했는데, Perp Dex 에어드롭 하입에 대한 짧은 생각. - 개인적으로 수 많은 Perp를 온전히 에어드롭을 위해 파밍한다면 앞으로 그렇게 좋은 수익이 나지 않을거라고 생각. - 시장에서의 초초초 하이 업사이드는 결국 "비효율성"에서 온다고 생각. 이게 정보의 불균형이든, 남들이 하지 않는 걸 하던, 아니면 한 프로젝트에 3년을 몰빵하던. *모나드 / 메가이더로 큰 돈을 버는 사람들은 모두가 하지 않을때 오랫동안 투자한 사람들이고, 플라즈마에 $1만 넣어도 큰 돈을 줬던것도 해당 사실이 공개된 정보가 아니었기 때문임. - 이걸 다른 말로 하면 "수익이 난다는 사실을 모두가 알고 달려들때"에는 수익이 정작 안남. 그러니까 "Perp Dex 파밍하면 큰 돈을 벌 수 있다" 라는 네러티브가 시장에 와버린 순간, 참여하는

3

31 Oct 2025, 06:35 UTC105 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

아스터 로켓런쳐 바이낸스 알파때느낌으로 처음엔 먹여주지않을까싶어서 500불씩 여러계정태웠는데 4000달러로 돌아왔네요 ㄷㄷ.. 심지어 일부보상만 지급된건데 빈집이니..(?)

2👍1

14 Jul 2025, 03:58 UTC275 viewsread 9 August 2026

5년뒤의 나한테 뭘사야하냐고 물어본다면 나는 비트코인만 사라고할듯

10 Jul 2025, 21:20 UTC253 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

비트코인있는사람과 없는사람은 예전에 아파트를 샀었던사람과 안샀던사람으로 나뉠것

2

20 Jun 2025, 08:53 UTC227 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

kaia 카카오페이 처음오를때 반응없길래 안샀는데 샀어야했다.. 포모와서 사면 물릴거아니까 지나쳐야겠다..

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @louiecoinstagram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“루이 Coinstagram” (@louiecoinstagram), 117 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/louiecoinstagram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.