Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юлия Эрц. АВА Теория и практика

Channel

Юлия Эрц. АВА Теория и практика

@autism_aba

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,219subscribers

+183 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001786235762
TypeChannel
Username@autism_aba
DescriptionКанал Юлии Эрц
Created8 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/autism_aba

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,03014,23414,1327 August 2026 — 14,036 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,037 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,034 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,030 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,032 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,035 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,042 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,045 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,047 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,050 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,061 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,060 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,054 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,053 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,054 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,060 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,059 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,053 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,052 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,060 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,068 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,075 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,086 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,109 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,121 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,128 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,122 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,130 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,203 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,193 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,190 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,198 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,201 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,194 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,199 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,201 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,198 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,202 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,207 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,208 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,206 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,210 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,212 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,218 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,222 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,225 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,222 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,234 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,225 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,226 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,214 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,220 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,223 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,219 subscribers11 November 2026 — 14,208 subscribers14 November 2026 — 14,219 subscribers14,2197 August 202614 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 99 days, net +183. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,999–14,265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 13:1914,219+11
11 Nov 2026, 16:4414,208-11
9 Nov 2026, 19:4714,219-4
6 Nov 2026, 04:5614,223+3
5 Nov 2026, 05:3514,220+6
4 Nov 2026, 04:2014,214-12
3 Nov 2026, 03:1614,226+1
2 Nov 2026, 02:1014,225-9
1 Nov 2026, 01:2014,234+12
30 Oct 2026, 23:1814,222-3
29 Oct 2026, 20:4914,225+3
28 Oct 2026, 23:3714,222+4
28 Oct 2026, 00:4914,218+6
27 Oct 2026, 02:2914,212+2
26 Oct 2026, 03:2714,210+4
24 Oct 2026, 23:5614,206-2
23 Oct 2026, 23:4614,208+1
22 Oct 2026, 21:3014,207+5
21 Oct 2026, 15:3614,202+4
20 Oct 2026, 10:5914,198first reading

Engagement

111 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.31%
avg views ÷ 14,219 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 111 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held111 (3 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total50,302
Reactions total1,079
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 08:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,190
Videos
≈28
Links
≈1,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,606 reactions across 106 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,49557.4%
🔥70927.2%
👍2369.06%
🎉933.57%
👏501.92%
🤩110.422%
🥰80.307%
😁30.115%
🤔10.038%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,606 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 06:56 UTC685 views49 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Субботнее поздравление!☀️ Сегодня мы поздравляем очаровательную Светлану Шумскую, поведенческого аналитика из г. Новосибирск, с получением квалификации "Сертифицированный поведенческий аналитик и супервизор" (CBA-S)! 🏆 Желаем успешного, эффективного и гибкого обучения всех инструкторов и учеников важным для жизни навыкам!💐💐💐

❤34🔥5🎉4😁3👍2👏1

Signed Юлия Эрц

13 Nov 2026, 05:51 UTC908 views24 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

📢 29 ноября в 14:00 (МСК) состоится вебинар «Преодоление трудностей при обучении поведенческим цепочкам» Поведенческие цепочки используются для обучения детей сложным навыкам: самообслуживанию, личной гигиене, приготовлению пищи и другим повседневным действиям. Но что делать, если ребёнок пропускает шаги, нарушает последовательность действий, зависит от подсказок или обучение перестаёт приносить результаты? 🗣 На ве…

❤18👍6

Signed Юлия Эрц

12 Nov 2026, 06:32 UTC≈1,200 views87 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Информационный марафон для кураторов Несколько месяцев назад мама ребенка с РАС подала жалобу в Комитет по этике на неэтичную практику куратора. Мы разобрались с деталями запроса мамы, и действительно подтвердили множество недочетов, которые были допущены куратором в практике. Но, эти недочеты были допущены скорее не по злому умыслу, а по причине отсутствия важных навыков у самого куратора.☹️ Казалось бы, кураторы зн…

🔥52❤20👍15

Signed Юлия Эрц

11 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC≈1,020 views14 reactionsread 15 November 2026

🔥🔥🔥Предлагаю вспомнить, как об этом наша прекрасная Евгения рассказывала на Конференции 2026: https://youtu.be/bJnpUKqSmnE

❤12👍2

Signed Юлия Эрц

11 Nov 2026, 06:09 UTC989 views14 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Дружественный анонс - для нашей чудесной Евгении Будник! 😍 ✅Стратегическое управление и развитие коррекционных центров ✅ Можно долго работать на пределе. Закрывать дыры. Держать всё на себе. Контролировать каждый шаг. Но правда в том, что такая модель не масштабируется. Большинство руководителей центров находятся в одной точке: — перегружены операционной работой — управляют «вручную» — зависят от команды — живут в н…

🔥9❤5

Signed Юлия Эрц

10 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,010 views31 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

✍️Коллеги, запишите, пожалуйста, в календарик! Встречаемся в субботу, 21 ноября, в 15.00 по мск, для обсуждения вопросов по применению Essential for Living. По ссылке, которая в дополнительных материалах к семинару.

❤18👍10🎉3

Signed Юлия Эрц

10 Nov 2026, 05:52 UTC≈1,160 views9 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Судя по результатам опроса👆, относительно немного коллег начали применять Essential for Living в своей практике после обучения на семинаре.😳 Прошел месяц, как мы красиво посетили семинар и попытались разобраться. Но, возможно остались вопросы? Возможно не хватило какой-то информации? Возможно, появились вопросы, на которые пока не удалось найти ответ?🧐 Как на счет того, чтобы провести еще одну встречу по итогам семин…

👍7❤2

Signed Юлия Эрц

9 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC≈1,170 views3 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤3

Signed Юлия Эрц

9 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC≈1,140 views34 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

А мы принимаем поздравления тоже! На прошлой неделе наша команда начала работать под супервизией Мигеля Авилы (первая когорта, так сказать). Будем учиться применять EFL в практике.🌱 Я знаю, что у коллег тоже есть похожий интерес, и Мигель сказал, что обязательно будут еще и другие когорты. Но, уже в следующем году, скорее всего, после следующего вводного семинара. Как только будет информация, сразу поделюсь.✍️ Кстати…

🔥22❤12

Signed Юлия Эрц

8 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC≈1,230 views12 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Работать над развитием эмоционального интеллекта важно, конечно же, прежде всего с самим собой. Но, и о наших прекРАСных учениках забывать не стоит! 😎 ✅📢Напоминаем Вам, что у нас есть запись отличного вебинара "Как научить ребенка с РАС делиться эмоциями?" 😀😞😠😦 🕐 Длительность - 2 часа 45 мин. ✅В ходе вебинара мы с коллегами делимся нашими практическими наработками по обучению детей с РАС старшего дошкольного и млад…

❤12

Signed Юлия Эрц

7 Nov 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,340 views32 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Субботнее поздравление!☀️ Сегодня мы поздравляем чудесную Татьяну Бочаровскую, поведенческого аналитика из г. Ессентуки, с получением квалификации "Сертифицированный поведенческий аналитик и супервизор" (CBA-S)! 🏆 Желаем красочной и разнообразной практики, сильных эмоций и воодушевления от достижений учеников!💖💖💖

🔥19❤13

Signed Юлия Эрц

Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @autism_aba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz239 voters

Как бихевиоризм рассматривает эмоции?

  1. Как антецедентные стимулы, вызывающие поведение18%
  2. Как респондентное поведение30%
  3. Как оперантное поведение15%
  4. Как последствия, подкрепляющие или наказующие поведения11%
  5. Как функции поведения4%
  6. Как ментальные сущности, управляющие поведением8%
  7. Как причинные факторы для человеческого поведения5%
  8. Как несуществующее явление9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Обучающие материалы
@xeiqaa · 21,355
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
Марианна Лынская
@mlynskaya · 26,355
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 September 2026
ПланетаМед - клиника сложного диагноза
@planetamed · 34,894
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Дефектология ©
@defektolog · 16,958
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
Ваш Логопед 👅
@Logopediyam · 39,881
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
Домашний Логопед 🗣
@logopedia · 42,183
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
ЛОГОПЕД
@logopedavdom · 29,443
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
НейроДом🏡
@NeiroDom · 20,795
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
Нейропсихология🧠 | Дети | Психология| Развитие🙆
@neyropsychology · 29,315
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
Краснощеков | Детская психиатрия
@doc_kras · 19,330
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юлия Эрц. АВА Теория и практика” (@autism_aba), 14,219 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/autism_aba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.