Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 100 days, net +269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,331–12,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 12:06
12,663
-3
10 Nov 2026, 23:16
12,666
-9
9 Nov 2026, 07:15
12,675
+8
8 Nov 2026, 00:18
12,667
-1
6 Nov 2026, 22:00
12,668
-10
5 Nov 2026, 22:39
12,678
+1
4 Nov 2026, 19:16
12,677
-8
3 Nov 2026, 20:11
12,685
+1
2 Nov 2026, 18:08
12,684
+1
1 Nov 2026, 20:12
12,683
-8
31 Oct 2026, 19:11
12,691
-1
30 Oct 2026, 20:39
12,692
-4
29 Oct 2026, 19:00
12,696
+1
28 Oct 2026, 17:36
12,695
+9
26 Oct 2026, 13:28
12,686
+1
25 Oct 2026, 10:15
12,685
+7
24 Oct 2026, 10:56
12,678
+2
23 Oct 2026, 11:10
12,676
+1
22 Oct 2026, 09:39
12,675
-1
20 Oct 2026, 23:37
12,676
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.0%
avg views ÷ 12,663 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
62 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
19,027
Reactions total
1,384
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,073 reactions across 61 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,365
46.6%
❤🔥
1,050
20.7%
🔥
609
12.0%
😍
220
4.34%
🕊
176
3.47%
💔
164
3.23%
😁
153
3.02%
🤩
149
2.94%
👍
40
0.788%
👏
34
0.67%
🤝
29
0.572%
💯
26
0.513%
😭
26
0.513%
🤯
17
0.335%
✍
12
0.237%
🤨
2
0.039%
🤓
1
0.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
АуСДВГ — неформальное название сочетания аутизма и синдрома дефицита внимания и гиперактивности (СДВГ) у одного человека.
Как часто СДВГ встречается при аутизме? И в чем разница между этими состояниями?
Задали эти вопросы врачу-психиатру Ксении Скрябиной.
«На практике я часто сталкивалась с ситуациями, когда ребенку с импульсивностью и трудностями в общении и учебе ставили СДВГ, а спустя несколько лет обнаруживали…
Прямо сейчас 3 398 человек проходят курс для родителей детей и взрослых с аутизмом «Ау».
Параллельно с лекциями и вебинарами об аутизме, мамы и папы поддерживают друг друга и делятся опытом.
И даже делают мемы.
Показываем!
Плакаты Partisan Press с цитатами студентов «Антон тут рядом» — вновь в нашем магазине.
Фразы Иосифа, Саши, Антона, Глеба и Нины напечатаны высокой печатью со старых деревянных литер.
Каждый плакат выпущен тиражом в 50 штук и вручную подписан карандашом.
«Чтобы было лучше», «Хороший день, чтобы быть», «Обреченно жизни радуюсь», «Никакого покоя» и «Жизнь — это когда живешь нормально».
Выбрать постер и…
Сначала спросим, потом кое-что покажем. Как прошел ваш день?
Хороший день, чтобы быть22%
Чтобы было лучше13%
Обреченно жизни радуюсь35%
Никакого покоя25%
Жизнь — это когда живешь нормально25%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Сотрудники фонда «Антон тут рядом» — люди веселые, в добром характере.
Что можно найти на их рабочих местах?
Кассету «Деловая женщина», шумоподавляющие наушники и кружку «Человек, уставший от труда и работы».
А еще — папочку для бумажек, кубарик и блокнот «Телефончик для звонка» из новой офисной коллекции фонда «Антон тут рядом».
Все, чтобы не только работать, но и отдыхать.
Отказ в предоставлении тьютора, вынужденный переход на домашнее обучение и неприятие со стороны одноклассников и педагогов.
Школа — место, в котором ребенок заводит первых друзей, учится ответственности и самостоятельности. Но для детей с нейроотличиями получить образование в обычной школе бывает очень непросто.
С какими трудностями сталкиваются аутичные дети в общеобразовательной школе?
Рассказала Маша Дегтева, п…
«Обожаю я лодки и имя твое».
Музыканты Оркестра «Антон тут рядом» выступят вместе с группой ARTEMIEV в клубе Jagger — уже в эту среду.
Берегите голову!
С Пашей нас связывает долгая и крепкая дружба. В 2024 году он приезжал в летнюю резиденцию «Антон тут рядом» в Рощино — творческий лагерь для взрослых людей с аутизмом.
Там Паша провел мастерскую и дал задание каждому студенту написать несколько слов о резиденции.…
В тренировочной квартире снова шумно и много гостей.
Слышно смех и стук кубиков во время настольной игры, работает вытяжка и кипит чайник.
Началась первая в этом году смена.
Новыми жильцами стали Антон, Женя, Федя, Коля и Женя — взрослые люди с аутизмом, студенты фонда «Антон тут рядом».
Следующие 4 месяца они будут учиться справляться с бытом и жить без родителей.
В этом помогают визуальные расписания, инструкц…
Превращаемся в музыку?
На концерте Оркестра «Антон тут рядом» на Московском Рынке.
Оркестр — инклюзивный музыкальный проект фонда «Антон тут рядом», в котором аутичные музыканты и участники без особенностей развития играют и сочиняют музыку вместе.
Тут рядом уже известные и полюбившиеся хиты — «Ты где?», «Весна», «Идеальные дни», «Выстрел».
А также новая музыка и аранжировки, которые участники Оркестра сочинили в…
В суете и круговерти забот и событий в «СЕАНСе» и Школе упустила очень важную вещь и стыжу себя за это. За весну, лето и осень в рамках моего нового проекта «Родители тут рядом» собрано около пяти миллионов рублей. Два миллиона собрано только подписчиками моего канала.
До сих пор я не писала отчет о работе программы, хотя все наши жертвователи получают ежемесячную таблицу, где могут узнать, куда и на что были потрач…
Самые сокровенные истории — у Любы.
Подписывайтесь.
❤22❤🔥10👍4🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @tutryadom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tutryadom edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
6 November 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сначала спросим, потом кое-что покажем. Как прошел ваш день?
Хороший день, чтобы быть22%
Чтобы было лучше13%
Обреченно жизни радуюсь35%
Никакого покоя25%
Жизнь — это когда живешь нормально25%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Театр «Мастерская» @vteatrekozlovnet · 19,655 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
Краснощеков | Детская психиатрия @doc_kras · 19,309 Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фонд «Антон тут рядом»” (@tutryadom), 12,663 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tutryadom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.