Channel
@Aalsharqawy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,601subscribers
-339 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001357689034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Aalsharqawy |
| Description | التعريف بكتاب الله تبارك وتعالى، تحقيقًا لقوله سبحانه: {وَأَنْ أَتْلُوَ الْقُرْآنَ}! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Aalsharqawy |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 31,601 | -27 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 31,628 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 31,639 | -12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 31,651 | -19 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 31,670 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:35 | 31,679 | -17 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 31,696 | -30 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 31,726 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:23 | 31,731 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 31,737 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 31,742 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 31,739 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 31,745 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 31,748 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 31,756 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 31,759 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 31,771 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 31,780 | -14 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 31,794 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 31,805 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (11 May 2026 – 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 11,080 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 07:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
«وإنَّه لمن الغلط في تقديري في بيان منهاج التعلم أن تجعل العلوم جميعًا ذات سُلَّم تعليمي واحد (مبتدئ ومتوسط ومنتهٍ)؛ فمن العلوم ما لا يصلح للمبتدئين بل هو للمتوسط والمنتهي في فن آخر، فمن حصَّل علمًا أو جملة من العلوم الشرعية وإن كان أجنبيًّا عن الأصول فليس هو كالمبتدئ في العلوم جميعًا، ولذلك يستقيم له أن يبدأ في الأصول بكتاب يناسبه وإن لم يكن مختصرًا كـ«المستصفى» أو «الروضة» أو نحو ذلك. وهذه المسألة وإن لم تكن من الأ…
«لم يكُن أصول الفقه علمًا مذهبي التدوين ... بخلاف علم الفقه الذي كان علمًا يصلح أن يكون مذهبيًّا، فصُنِّف فيه على قولٍ واحد وجُرِّد عن الخلاف في بواكير تمايز العلوم، لكن النتيجة المرتقبة لتوهُّم الخلاف في الأصول والاختصاص المذهبي ومقايسته بالفقه هي: تجريد التصنيف الأصولي عن الخلاف والتدوين على قول واحد، فبعد أن كانت المذهبية شيئًا يطرأ على الخلاف المحكِي في الكتب الأصولية، صارت المذهبية حقيقةً واقعة في التدوين الأصول…
«تدلُّ فروع الأئمَّة جميعًا على الأخذ بالقراءة الشَّاذَّة مثلًا، وقول الصحابي، والعمل بالمصلحة، وأنواع الأقيسة، وغير ذلك من طرق الاجتهاد، وإن حُكِي الخلاف بين الأئمَّة في كل مسألةٍ من تلك المسائل، وما ذلك إلا لما ذكرته من وجود اختلافٍ، لكن لا في الأصول، بل في طرق التعامل معها». [المدخل إلى أصول الفقه، د. محمد طارق الفوزان: (409)]، وهو كتابٌ نفيس جدًّا، جزى الله مؤلِّفه خير الجزاء.
كنت شغوفا بتحصيل السماع العالي وواصلت في ذلك الأيام والليالي، وحصلت الكثير من المسموعات على طبقة شيوخ مشايخي، بل وأدركت - بفضل من الله وحده - بعض طبقة شيوخ مشايخ مشايخي. حتى حصل لي عدة مواقف - أحسبها تنبيها من الله - صرفتني كثيرا عن مجالس الرواية إلى تحصيل الدراية؛ وهو الحقيق بأن يوصف بـ "العلم" حقا وصدقا. وانشغال طلاب العلم اليوم وإكبابهم على تحصيل الرواية من غير دراية، ليس من باب الاشتغال بالمفضول عن الفاضل، بل من …
🌿 بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم 🌿 📺 مجالس القرآن | لقاء مباشر في زمنٍ تتزاحم فيه مشاغل الحياة، وتزداد فيه حاجة القلب إلى ما يزكّيه ويثبّته، يبقى القرآن أعظم ما تُبنى به النفوس، وتُصلح به المجتمعات. ومن هنا نلتقي في «مجالس القرآن» في لقاءٍ إيماني نستضيء فيه بكلام الله، ونتأمل أثر الاجتماع على القرآن في إصلاح الفرد والمجتمع. 🍃 🎙️ ضيف اللقاء: الدكتور أحمد عبد المنعم 📌 عنوان اللقاء: «أهمية مجالس القرآن في تزكية النفس والمج…
https://youtu.be/6aUDBMhRhOw?si=82fK-rAr8hNSlyeb
فتح باب التسجيل برنامج ضبط وتحقيق الأداء القرآني - حُسن الأداء في مدينة (أبها) بالتعاون مع (جامع الإحسان) بالمنسك الفئة: حُفَّاظ وحافظات القرآن الكريم ⏪ المسارات: 1- ضبط وتحقيق الأداء. 2- استقطاب المقرئين وتأهيلهم رواية ودراية. ⏪ مدة التسجيل: 1-8 ربيع الأول 1448هـ ⏪ رابط التسجيل: https://forms.gle/QhtnaASnWVKjmwSt6
https://www.youtube.com/live/9gme6zLsoDU?si=wY2Pct7iirtiGkBU
لم أسترح يومًا إلى القراءة من غير الكتاب المطبوع، وما زلت إن احتجت إلى كتاب عانيت في تَطْلابِه حتى أناله، فلا أجد نفسي تقنع أن القراءة من الكتاب المصوّر تنفعها! وليس ذلك لعلةٍ في الكتاب المصور من مثل تعب العين أو عسر التقليب، بل لِما يحدثه من قطيعة مع الكتاب الورقي، وهو شيء لا أجد نفسي تقبله، فهو الأصل في القراءة والتعلم ما دام في الدنيا شيء اسمه كتاب. لكني وجدت عناءًا في سفري وتنقلي وساعات خروجي إذا طالتْ، فإما أن…
الحمد لله ربِّ العالمين، والصَّلاة والسَّلام على الرَّسول الأمين: تتوفَّر كتبي: 1- «المشوِّق إلى القرآن». 2- «الدَّليل إلى القرآن». 3- العناية بكتاب: «(النَّبأ العظيم)، للشيخ العلَّامة د. محمد دراز». 4- «مفاتِح علم التفسير». 5- «اللؤلؤ المنظوم في بيان مواقع النُّجوم في مواقع العلوم». بجناح المكتبة العصريَّة بمعرض «إسطنبول»، (A10).
🔊 للاستماع إلى التلاوة على مختلف المنصات: سورة الأعراف | الشيخ عمرو الشرقاوي | رمضان 1447 هـ روابط التلاوة: اليوتيوب: https://youtu.be/eRwblpV61UE الساوند: https://on.soundcloud.com/65fXKAjzp5Orz5Ixb6 التليجرام: https://t.me/atluwalquran/120
سورة الأعراف | الشيخ عمرو الشرقاوي | رمضان 1447 هـ
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @Aalsharqawy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“المُشوِّق إلى القُرآن | عمرو الشرقاوي” (@Aalsharqawy), 31,601 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aalsharqawy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.