Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 21 of the 21 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 79 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @lthtdo — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
66 measurements spanning 96 days, net -971. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,989–28,252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 08:46
27,135
-15
9 Nov 2026, 13:05
27,150
-5
8 Nov 2026, 07:16
27,155
-12
7 Nov 2026, 00:56
27,167
-8
5 Nov 2026, 22:30
27,175
-11
4 Nov 2026, 23:09
27,186
-11
3 Nov 2026, 19:56
27,197
-6
2 Nov 2026, 20:47
27,203
-10
1 Nov 2026, 18:29
27,213
-6
31 Oct 2026, 19:41
27,219
-12
30 Oct 2026, 22:49
27,231
-17
29 Oct 2026, 20:56
27,248
-6
28 Oct 2026, 23:01
27,254
-14
27 Oct 2026, 21:44
27,268
-11
26 Oct 2026, 18:20
27,279
-12
25 Oct 2026, 20:35
27,291
-9
24 Oct 2026, 22:26
27,300
-8
23 Oct 2026, 20:38
27,308
-19
22 Oct 2026, 18:39
27,327
-14
21 Oct 2026, 13:05
27,341
first reading
Engagement
79 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 154 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.32%
avg views ÷ 27,135 subscribers
Avg views / post
629
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.603%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 79 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
79 (6 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
13,836
Reactions total
73
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
598
Videos
39
Links
577
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 11s
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
326 reactions across 67 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
297
91.1%
👍
27
8.28%
🏆
1
0.307%
💯
1
0.307%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (13.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📖 لَحَنَ في القرآن.. فتبرأ من النبي ﷺ!
يُروى أن أعرابيًّا قدم المدينة في زمن عمر بن الخطاب رضي الله عنه، فطلب من رجل أن يعلّمه شيئًا من القرآن، فأقرأه الرجل سورة التوبة حتى بلغ قول الله تعالى:
﴿أَنَّ اللَّهَ بَرِيءٌ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ وَرَسُولُهُ﴾.
🔎 فجرَّ الرجل كلمة «رسولُه»، فقرأها «رسولِه»، ففهم الأعرابي أن الله بريء من رسوله أيضًا، فقال: إن يكن الله بريئًا من رسوله فأنا أبرأ منه!
فلما بلغ ذلك عمر بن الخطاب ر…
«يؤذيني ابنُ آدمَ، يسبُّ الدهرَ، وأنا الدهرُ».. ما المعنى الصحيح لهذا الحديث القدسي؟
📖 يرشدنا هذا الحديث القدسي الشريف إلى أدبٍ عظيم في الاعتقاد والقول؛ فقد نهى الله تعالى عن سبِّ الدهر، لما يتضمنه ذلك من اعتراضٍ على ما يجري في الكون، ونسبةٍ للأحداث إلى الزمان، مع أن الله سبحانه هو المدبّر لكل شيء.
✨ قال الله تعالى في الحديث القدسي:
«يؤذيني ابنُ آدمَ، يسبُّ الدهرَ، وأنا الدهرُ، بيدي الأمرُ، أُقلِّب الليلَ والنهارَ»…
📚 النحو وحده لا يكفي.
🔎 فالنحو يضبط بناء الجملة، لكن علوم العربية تتجاوز ذلك؛ فـالصرف يكشف بنية الكلمة وتحوّلاتها، والبلاغة تكشف أسرار اختيار الأسلوب وترتيب ألفاظه، والدلالة تبحث في الفروق الدقيقة بين المعاني، والأدب يعرّفك بكيفية استعمال العرب للغتهم في الشعر والنثر.
❓ لذلك قد تعرف إعراب الجملة، ولا تزال بحاجة إلى أن تعرف: لماذا صيغت بهذه الطريقة؟ وما الذي أضافه هذا اللفظ دون غيره؟ وكيف يتغير المعنى بتغير الصياغة؟…
🌸 من تشتت المعرفة إلى وضوح الرؤية.. ابدئي رحلتكِ الآن!
كم مرة بحثتِ عن إجابات لأسئلة تشغلكِ، وتنقلتِ بين عشرات المحاضرات والمقالات، ثم شعرتِ أنكِ بحاجة إلى من يجمع لكِ شتات المعرفة ويرشدكِ من أين تبدئين؟
🌷 لهذا تقدم لكِ منصة «واعية» برنامج «رحلة وعي»، في مسار تعليمي يجمع لكِ شتات المعرفة عبر 5 سفرات معرفية، تنتقلين فيها من اكتشاف ذاتكِ وفهم واقعكِ إلى بناء رؤية أوضح لحياتكِ.
📝 خمس سفرات معرفية في انتظاركِ:
🔹الإدر…
🌷 قد تكون الكلمة التي تقولينها لطفلك اليوم... بدايةً لحدثٍ يغيّر التاريخ.
هناك أمهات يربين أبناءهن ليعيشوا أيامهم، وهناك أمهات يربين أبناءهن ليتركوا أثرًا يبقى بعد رحيلهم.
📚 ومن أجمل النماذج التي يذكرها التاريخ أمُّ السلطان محمد الفاتح؛ تلك المرأة التي لم تنظر إلى ابنها على أنه طفل يحتاج إلى الطعام والكساء فحسب، وإنما رأت فيه مشروع قائد يحمل همَّ أمته.
كانت تملأ قلبه منذ صغره ببشارة النبي ﷺ بفتح القسطنطينية، وتأخذ…
🧭 بوصلة الحنبلي.. خطوتك الأولى في رحلة التفقه.
كيف نشأ الفقه الإسلامي؟ وكيف تشكّلت المذاهب الفقهية؟ وما الذي يميّز المذهب الحنبلي في أصوله ومنهجه؟ ومن هم المشتغلون بالفقه، وما مراتبهم وأدوارهم؟
📚 انطلاقًا من هذه الأسئلة وغيرها مما يشغل المقبلين على دراسة الفقه.
يعلن معهد الإمام البهوتي عن فتح باب التسجيل في برنامج «بوصلة الحنبلي».
✨ برنامج تأسيسي يضع بين يديك مدخلًا منهجيًّا لدراسة الفقه، يبني تصورك عن الشريعة وع…
📚 12 شيخًا يصحبونك في رحلتك العلمية بمعهد الإمام النووي.
لأن رحلة التفقه لا تقتصر على دراسة الفقه وحده، بل يحتاج طالب الفقه إلى دراسة علوم أخرى تعينه على فهمه والتعمق فيه.
👈 حرصنا في معهد الإمام النووي على أن تتلقى كل علم على يد شيخ متخصص فيه، متمكن من مسائله، له خبرة في تدريسه وتبسيطه لطلابه.
لذلك لم نكتف بشيخ أو شيخين، بل اخترنا لك 12 شيخًا من أهل العلم والتخصص، يصحبونك في رحلتك العلمية، كلٌّ منهم يدرّسك العلم ا…
🧭 تبحث عن العزّ… فهل بحثت عنه في تقواك؟
📜 قال الشافعي رحمه الله: «من لم تعزّه التقوى فلا عزّ له».
قد ينال الإنسان مكانةً بماله أو منصبه، لكن منزلته عند الله تُقاس بتقواه.
📖 قال تعالى: ﴿إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ﴾ [الحجرات،١٣].
🔎 والتقوى تظهر في اختياراتك حين تحفظ حقّ غيرك، وتصدق حيث يغريك الكذب، وتمتنع عن الحرام مع قدرتك عليه.
ففي هذه المواقف تقدّم رضا الله على ما ترجوه من منفعة أو قبول.
📌 فا…
🔹 لحظة الغضب لا تُسقط القيم… بل تكشف حقيقتها.
📖 قال الله تعالى: {وَعَاشِرُوهُنَّ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ}.
فالمعاشرة بالمعروف تعرفُ و تبلغ ذروتها عند اشتداد الخلاف، حيث تنكشف حقيقة الأخلاق ويتبيّن رسوخ القيم.
🔎 ففي لحظات التوتر، يميل الطبع إلى الانفعال وطلب الغلبة، غير أن التوجيه الشرعي يرتقي بالسلوك إلى ضبط النفس، وحفظ اللسان، واستحضار حقّ العِشرة.
💬 فعن أبي هريرة أن النبي ﷺ قال: «ليس الشديد بالصُّرَعة، إنما الشديد الذي …
📊 معهد الإمام ابن مالك.. إحصائيات وأرقام.
🌍 منذ انطلاقه، جمع المعهد طلاب العلم من مختلف أنحاء العالم، حتى بلغ عدد طلابه أكثر من 15,000 طالب من 95 دولة.
📚 4 سنوات دراسية يسير فيها الطالب وفق سُلَّم تعليمي متدرج، ينتقل خلالها من مرحلة إلى أخرى في دراسة علوم العربية.
▶️ وخلال هذه الرحلة، يدرس الطالب 700 درس أساسي في أكثر من 600 ساعة تعليمية، تغطي فروعًا متعددة من علوم اللغة العربية.
🎓 ويشرف على هذه الرحلة 18 مدرسًا …
📚 الفخر الحقيقي لأهل العلم.
يُقاس فضل الإنسان بما أتقنه من علمٍ نافع، وما أثمره علمه من هدايةٍ وعمل.
✨ فالعلم يرفع صاحبه، ويمنحه بصيرةً يهتدي بها في طريقه، وينفع بها غيره.
🔎 وكلما ازداد المرء إحسانًا وفهمًا، ظهر قدره فيما يحسنه ويقدمه.
📖 ولهذا كان طلب العلم من أجلِّ أبواب بناء الإنسان ورفعة شأنه.
📌 فاجعل لك من العلم نصيبًا، وابدأ بما تحتاج إليه في دينك وحياتك، ثم حوّل ما تعلمته إلى عملٍ يظهر أثره في سلوكك وينفع …
📿 التسبيح يسيرٌ على اللسان… عظيمٌ في الميزان.
📖 قال الله تعالى: ﴿وَاذْكُرْ رَبَّكَ كَثِيرًا وَسَبِّحْ بِالْعَشِيِّ وَالْإِبْكَارِ﴾. [ آل عمران: 41]
التسبيح عبادة تتردد مع حركة الكون؛ فالسموات والأرض ومن فيهن يسبّحون بحمد الله، والملائكة يسبّحون له ليلًا ونهارًا.
👈 وهو من أعظم ما يُعين على طمأنينة القلب وتفريج الكرب، قال الله تعالى عن يونس عليه السلام:
﴿فَلَوْلَا أَنَّهُ كَانَ مِنَ الْمُسَبِّحِينَ لَلَبِثَ فِي …
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @lthtdo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@lthtdo edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 November 2026
Most recent edit
10 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
جمعية تكرار لحفظ القرآن وإتقانه @algran1 · 79,869#98
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أكاديمية بناء - مجتمع الأمهات والآباء @Benaa_academy_2022 · 19,653 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
برنامج "مُدَّكِر" - القناة العامة @ModdakerELearn · 49,025 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 26 August 2026
برنامج تاج الكرامة @Tajulkaramah · 24,962 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
تسجيلات دروس رِفقة || @rifqahrecordings · 28,445 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
تدبر القرآن في ٣٠٠ يوم @QTAReads · 37,755 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
English @English2020free · 221,342 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 August 2026
منصة حفاظ المتون @Huffazulmutoon · 26,608 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
دورات قرآنية | مساق بَيِّنَاتٍ @dawaratquranya · 94,455 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
قناة الدروس | أكاديمية أساور الأنثوية @asawir10 · 35,367 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
معهد العلامة خليل للتفقه المالكي @KhalilFiqh · 21,026 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
حالات واتساب إسلامية @alhosaree · 23,576 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026
أَرحنا بِها يَا بِلال | Comfort us with it, O BILAL @alraahwalslaah · 21,344 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
أكاديمية الحسيني @Acadmy7 · 34,089 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
اختبارات القرآن الكريم @Qurantestss · 30,568 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لتهتدوا” (@lthtdo), 27,135 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lthtdo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.