إلى محبي #سكة_يمين، تنتظركم أخبار سارّة قريبًا... #رواسخ
❤54🤩13👏3

Channel
@ismail_arafa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,878subscribers
-245 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001739343605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ismail_arafa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ismail_arafa |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 23:54 | 15,878 | +41 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 15,837 | -12 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:11 | 15,849 | -8 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:39 | 15,857 | +2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:50 | 15,855 | -7 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:24 | 15,862 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:39 | 15,868 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:20 | 15,873 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:26 | 15,876 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:05 | 15,880 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:56 | 15,888 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:34 | 15,890 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 15,897 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 15,903 | +5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:40 | 15,898 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 15,905 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 15,907 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 15,913 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 15,914 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 15,918 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (3 April 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,470 |
| Reactions total | 151 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,773 reactions across 31 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,784 | 73.8% | |
| 👍 | 389 | 10.3% | |
| 💔 | 247 | 6.55% | |
| 👏 | 184 | 4.88% | |
| 😢 | 136 | 3.60% | |
| 🤩 | 33 | 0.875% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,773 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
إلى محبي #سكة_يمين، تنتظركم أخبار سارّة قريبًا... #رواسخ
❤54🤩13👏3
استضافة جديدة كرّمني بها الحبيب شعيب لنناقش مساحة أخرى من مساحات تغول علم النفس في حياتنا اليومية وهي مساحة "تربية الأبناء". وأقارن في هذه الحلقة بين بعض مفاهيم وجوانب التربية القرآنية والتربية النبوية للأبناء والبنات وبين التربية الغربية أو الحديثة أو أيا ما كان مسماها. مشاهدة مفيدة. https://youtu.be/43x8qXofURM
❤69👍9👏3
{وَمَن يُؤْمِن بِاللَّهِ يَهْدِ قَلْبَهُ} جاء في قراءة عكرمة: {وَمَنْ يُؤْمِنْ بِاللَّهِ يَهْدَأْ قَلْبُهُ}
❤152👍5👏1
(والفتاح: من أسماء الله تعالى، ومعناه: الذي لا يُغلِقُ وجوهَ النعم بالعصيان، ولا يترك إيصالَ الرحمة بالنسيان، والذي فتح على النفوس بابَ توفيقهِ، وعلى القلوبِ باب تحقيقه، والذي يفتح بعنايتهِ كُلَّ مقفل، ويكشف بهدايتهِ ما أُشكل). الشيخ عبد الباسط بن محمد البلقيني ، في كتابه الوفا بشرح الاصطفا في أسماء المصطفى ﷺ
❤130👍5👏3
السلام عليكم، نأسف لازعاجكم سننتقل لقناة جديدة، لظروف تقنية خارجة عن الإرادة. وسيجري حذف هذه القناة. شكرا لاهتمامكم بهذا الأمر. رابط القناة الجديدة: https://t.me/tareqkhamees
❤21
الناس بتتكلم عن المشاهير اللي بيتحولو لـ"سماسرة" مع شركات الحج لأنهم بيسلعوا الدين والإنكار دا مطلوب وحسن لكن لو هنتكلم عن التكسب بالدين فهناك نقطة قليلا ما أسمع حد بيتكلم فيها وهو أن كتير من المتصدرين ف مساحة علم النفس الإسلامي والكوتشنج الإسلامي هم حرفيا بيتكسبو بالدين، حرفيا دون مجاز يعني مثلا ما معنى أن واحدة تعمل محاضرة عن الاستعداد لرمضان بعنوان روحانيات رمضان بمبلغ وقدره؟ .. ماحنا طول عمرنا بنسمع مشايخ وبنحضر…
❤155👏16👍11😢4
شرفني الأخ والصديق العزيز Anass Hamdi بهذه الاستضافة العفوية والتي ناقشنا فيها استنزافنا في العالم الرقمي ثم تحدثنا حول توجيهات النبي ﷺ للصحابة في بعض المواقف والسلوكيات، وكيف يمكننا أن نقتدي بهذا الجيل في ترشيد أفكارنا ومشاعرنا في هذه الأوقات. مشاهدة مفيدة https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn0e6j77oJE
❤60🤩4👍3
جزاكم الله خيرا على التفاعل الإجابات معظمها تقول Playlist واحدة أفضل وهو كذلك إن شاء الله دعواتكم بالتيسير والتوفيق
❤137👍22👏8
سؤال يا كرام: في دورة (علم التزكية أم علم النفس) التي سأنشرها قريبا إن شاء الله ، ربما تصل السلسلة إلى 20 حلقة، وكل حلقة ساعة تقريبا كل أربع حلقات تتناول موضوع واحد تقريبا ، فسؤالي هو: هل الأفضل أن تُنشر السلسلة على يوتيوب كلها في Playlist واحدة (20 حلقة مثلا) أم الأفضل تقسيمها إلى Playlists مختلفة؟ التعليقات مفتوحة
❤127👍11
إحدى مضار المصطلحات النفسية الشعبوية أنها تجعل المسلم مغتربًا عن القرآن والسنة ومنفصلًا عن تراثه. التوتر النفسي - الضغط النفسي - المعاناة النفسية - الاحتراق النفسي - الخ .. كل هذه المصطلحات إذا استخدمها المسلم لوصف مشاعره فإنه إذا فتح القرآن ودواوين السنة فلن يجد وصفًا لها ولا علاجًا لها. وبالتالي سيضطر للبحث عن تحليل لتلك المشاعر و "علاج" لها من "المختصين" النفسيين وليس من القرآن والسنة ولا من علم التزكية. بل أنه…
❤147👍21👏13🤩3
قال رجلٌ لبشر بن الحارث الحافي: قد أضرني الفقر والعيال، فادعُ الله لي! فقال له بشر: (إذا قال لك عيالك: "ليس عندنا خبز ولا دقيق، ونحن جياع!" فادعُ الله لي أنت ذلك الوقت، فإن دعاءك أفضل من دعائي).
❤140👍7😢3
شرفني الإخوة في منصة نوافذ بهذه الاستضافة في هذه الحلقة، التي ناقشنا فيها موضوع توسع علم النفس خارج حدوده العيادية، وما هي الأضرار التي سببها لنا.. وتناقشنا حول أضرار المصطلحات النفسية، وكيف طغى الخطاب النفسي على فهم الدين الإسلامي نفسه، وماذا خسرنا عندما تخلينا عن الشريعة وتشبثنا بالخطاب النفسي. وكيف يمكن لخطاب الشريعة والتزكية والآداب الشرعية ونحو ذلك أن يصنع لنا منهاجًا وشرعة تعدّل لنا سلوكياتنا ومشاعرنا وأزماتن…
❤56👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @ismail_arafa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“إسماعيل عرفة” (@ismail_arafa), 15,878 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ismail_arafa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.