ROBINHOOD US LISTS $CASHCAT SOURCE

Channel
엄선된 준의 식견
@umjuninsight
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
743subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003811391998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @umjuninsight |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/umjuninsight |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 743 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 736 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 736 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 55.8%
- avg views ÷ 743 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 415
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.173%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,881 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 88.9% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://x.com/CecuroAlert/status/2085338071994626542 500K USDC 탈취범 MEV 봇에 참교육당해 120K밖에 못가져갔다고 하네요 ㅋㅋㅋ
https://x.com/greenfield_cap/status/2085308836978532766
https://x.com/wintermute_t/status/2084968857425662353?s=46
: : [데이터/코멘트] 데이터로 바라보는 업비트의 스테이블코인 시장 확대 전략 작성자: 캘빈 필자는 업비트 또한 수수료 무료화 이벤트의 거래량 증가 효과가 매우 일시적인 현상에 그칠 것이며, 다양한 스테이블코인의 상장이 USDT로부터의 분산효과를 충분히 일으킬 수 없으리라는 것을 충분히 예상하고 있었을 것이라고 생각한다. (만약 아니었다면 매우 유감이다.) 거래량 기반으로 계산했을 때 업비트는 지난 15일간 약 10억 원의 수수료 수익을 포기했다. 업비트가 비교적 수익성이 낮은 섹터에 굳이 수수료를 포기해가며 자원을 투입하고 있는 이유는 무엇일까? 이는 한국의 규제 환경의 변화에서 실마리를 찾을 수 있다. 첫째는 원화 스테이블코인의 도입이 가시권 안에 들어왔다는 점이다. 한국 정부는 2026년 경제성장전략에서 하반기 디지털자산기본법 제…
업비트 NFT 사이트 옥에티 아이콘은 이더스캔 아이콘인데 클릭하면 이더스캔이 아닌 자회사 람다256의 Luniverse 사이트가 나오네요
브리지·스왑 애그리게이터로 유명한 Jumper Advanced 기능 정식 출시 정식 출시 기능 ● 트랜잭션 체결 결과 사전 시뮬레이션 ● 거래 페어별 스마트 슬리피지 자동 설정 ● 대규모 주문을 여러 유동성 소스로 분할하는 Jumper Flow ● 목표 가격에 미리 주문을 걸어두는 지정가 주문 특히 큰 금액을 스왑할 때 발생하는 가격 충격과 예상 견적·실제 체결 수량 간 차이를 줄이는 데 초점을 맞춘 기능으로 보임. 기존에는 브릿지 용도로 자주 활용했다면, 이제는 대규모 온체인 스왑이나 지정가 주문에서도 활용도가 높아질 듯 X / Announcements
크립토에서 보낸 시간 후회하지말고 연습했다 생각하래요😣 여튼 저 부분 말고도 글이 괜찮아서, 그리 길지도 않고 "만약 믿음을 잃어가고 있다면, 크립토에서 보낸 시간들을 후회하지 마십시오... 그것을 새로운 방향으로 나아가기 위한 연료로 사용하십시오. 다른 분야보다 10배는 더 빠르게 일어났던 모든 배움을 챙겨서, 당신이 매료되는 그 어떤 곳이든 기하급수적으로 성장한 자신을 향하게 하십시오. 크립토는 당신을 분석적인 기계로 연마시켰습니다. 미래에 대한 당신의 이론들에 실시간 시장 피드백을 제공했습니다. 또한 탐욕, 심리학, 경제학, 거시적 및 미시적 힘에 대해 가르쳐 주었습니다. 그 지식은 어디에나 적용될 수 있습니다. 이제 세상은 밈코인 차트처럼 움직이고 있습니다. 크립토 그 자체가 최종 목적지였던 적은 결코 없었습니다. 그것은 앞으로 다…
아캄(Arkham)이 어제부로 공식적으로 x402 표준을 API에 지원하게 된 사실을 아시나요? [관련 트윗] 마침 공유해주신 메세지가 기억이나서, GPT에 권한 부여한후, agentcash, arkham x402 endpoint 이용해서 오늘 상장한 $CAP 핫월렛 추적하고 대시보드 만들어달라고 요청하니 24분만에 깔끔하게 만들어주네요
Posted without readable text
이제 디파이라마에는 MM도 성적표가 생김 https://defillama.com/market-makers
이번 주 x402 관련해서 굵직한 뉴스가 3개 정도 더 남아있다고 말해줘서 기대해 봐야겠습니다. 결국 저런 대형 플레이어들이 판을 끌어줘야 우리 x402 농가도 살아나는 것 아니겠습니까.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @umjuninsight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 77,546 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@feelgoodforum · 293 postsRWA 맛집: 자산 맛좀 볼래?
@RWAkr · 1,4923 posts저스트코인
@JUSTCRYT · 2,9072 posts초심 찾은 아난의 코인 쓰레기통
@anancoin · 5,3511 post저는 찬껭입니다.
@chankkeng · 1231 post크로키의 잡도리
@crocy_note · 3,6431 post크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 9,2581 post🤧 도묵이와 코딱지들 🤧
@domuks · 1101 post꿀통연구소(코인, 에어드랍 공부중)
@honeylab1 · 6281 post쿠즈코 멘징방
@nananaa_kuzco · 1,5271 postNutty flavors — AI, On-chain, Stocks
@nuttyflavors · 2,2191 post사카밤바스피스 낙서장
@otakurypto · 5481 postPAIGU - Pagu's AI Diary
@paigudiary · 551 post꿀젬씨티
@slowchain · 1871 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“엄선된 준의 식견” (@umjuninsight), 743 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/umjuninsight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.