저번주부터 긴호흡으로 모으기 시작중
❤10

Channel
@rising_090
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,198subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002472205456 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rising_090 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rising_090 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 3,198 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 3,203 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 3,205 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,365 |
| Reactions total | 107 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
107 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 99 | 92.5% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.61% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
저번주부터 긴호흡으로 모으기 시작중
❤10
어제 늦게까지 모니터링 했던 건 스페이스X의 언락 후 가격움직임이었는데요. IPO 이후 묶여 있던 최대 9억1,150만 주가 처음으로 매도 가능한 상태로 바뀌는 날이었기 때문인데요. 기존 유통물량 6억3,890만 주보다도 약 43% 많은 규모라 장이 열리면 매물이 쏟아지지 않을까 했는데, 생각보다 $100도 깨지 않고 반등하더라고요. 오히려 주가는 실적 발표 직후 상장 후 최저가를 기록했었는데요. 실적을 간단히 보면, - Q2 매출 $7.81B, 전년 대비 +92% - 순손실 $541M, 전년 $1.01B에서 축소 - 사업의 기초 수익성을 보여주는 조정 EBITDA는 $3.54B로 191% 증가 - Starlink 가입자 1,200만 명 - Starlink 중심의 통신 사업은 $1.66B의 영업이익 - AI 부문 영업손실 $1.26B 결…
❤10
non-human traffic의 큰 비중은 AI학습 데이터 수집 크롤러, 검색 + 에이전트 혼합형 크롤러가 차지할거고 그 외 스크래퍼나 스팸봇같은 전통적인 봇이 있을듯 사실 크롤러 자체는 프론티어가 대부분일거라 각 개인이 오픈소스를 통해 이용하는 에이전트는 적을듯 다만, 오픈소스에 대한 각 기업과 국가의 지지가 점점 강화되는 가운데, 이것이 대중화되어 우리 스스로도 인식하지 못하는 단계가 온다면? 그 순간이 엣지AI, 국가단위로는 소버린AI가 화두가 될 것이고 그때는 다시금 주도주가 발생하지 않을까 싶네
구성 괜찮은듯
❤4
"For the first time in human history, in Q2, more than 50% of the traffic flowing across Cloudflare's network was not human. The number of requests on our network from AI agents continues to grow unabated. With the web shifting from human-driven browsing to AI answer engines and agent-driven commerce, we are witnessing a fundamental rewrite of the internet for machine to machine traffic." 컨콜 中
❤2
그리고 좋게보고 있는 네오클라우드에 버리가 숏친건 별로 걱정이 안되는게... 일단 레오폴드랑 비교했을 때, 버리가 운용하는 자금은 비교도 안될정도로 적음 + 레오폴드가 털린게 결국 포지션이랑 사이즈를 공개했기 때문인데, 마찬가지로 버리도 당할 가능성도 있음 무엇보다도 레오폴드 물량을 씨타델이 먹었고 그 중 네비우스가 꽤 높은 비중인데 이걸 대놓고 숏쳤다는건 씨타델이랑 반대로 가겠다는건데... 흠... 주가를 떠나서 앞으로 버리의 흐름을 지켜보는 것도 재미는 있을 듯 (오라클 숏친건 공감됨)
❤7👍2👏1
현재 반도체의 약세는 수요 및 공급의 이슈가 아닌 경제의 문제라고 생각중 이미 뭐 수요 공급을 논하는 시점은 한참 지났고, 과연 자금이슈를 해결 하냐가 중요 쟁점 그러니 그렇게 금리에 이악물고 떠드는 중 마이클버리는 돌려막기 버블이라고 주장중이며 각종 숏을 오픈중 (버리는 섭스택으로 한달에 말도 안되는 수익을 벌어들이는 중이니 돈이 무한이긴 할듯...) 다시 말해, 이런 자금흐름의 이슈를 해결해야 후행적으로 주가견인이 가능할텐데 요즘 들려오는 긍정적인 소식이 있긴함 이번 미국 중간선거는 민주당의 승리가 정베로 여겨지고 있지만 얼마나 큰 승리를 하느냐는 또 다른 문제임 문제는, 민주당이 돈이 없음 자꾸 데센 반대하고 클라리티 반대하고 이러니, 로비자금이 안들어오는 상황임 그러니 이전에 비해 민주당내에서도 위와 같은 법안을 찬성하자는 …
❤8👏2
**보안주에 대한 생각 보안주가 견조한 실적을 바탕으로 원만한 상승을 하는 중인데 한가지 경계해야할 점이라 함은, 위와 같은 기업들이 제공하는 서비스는 우리같은 소비자 친화적인 것은 아님. 기업대상이며 리테일들에게는 크게 와닿지 않을 수 있는 부분. 그럼 메모리, 전력은 우리에게 와닿느냐? 라고 한다면, 그래도 직관적으로 납득은 되니까 기업들이 무한정 보안인프라에 투자를 할 수 없는 노릇이고, 각 기업마다 해당부분에 지출할 비용의 상한선이 정해져 있는걸로 앎 다시 말해, 데센 인프라처럼 무한정 돈을 쏟아부을 수 있는 구조는 아니며 리테일의 공감을 얻기에는 다소 한계점이 명확함 현재 보안주의 흐름이 강한 것은, 올해초 saas 억까 + 반도체의 수급으로부터의 유입이 겹쳐진 결과로 보이며 주도주가 되기에는 다소 어려움이 있을까라는 생각…
❤6👏2
ㅅㅅ
라운드힐에서 네오클라우드 etf $ncld 금일 상장예정
❤6
net은 이미 300불을 넘기고 무한 우상향 중이고... ddog도 무한 우상향중이고... akam의 보안 및 클라우드 성장세가 cdn 원툴을 지울 수 있는 기점이 될텐데 시장이 영 관심이 없나봄
ㅅㅅ
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @rising_090. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 207,485 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“어이 청진기” (@rising_090), 3,198 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rising_090.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.