Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [미래에셋증권 전략/퀀트 유명간]

Channel

[미래에셋증권 전략/퀀트 유명간]

@eqmirae

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

22,719subscribers

+396 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001304106630
TypeChannel
Username@eqmirae
Description미래에셋증권 투자전략/퀀트 텔레그램
Created4 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/eqmirae

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@eqmirae/3126 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC@globalmktinsight/72916 Aug 2026, 01:53 UTC1.0032 minutes
@eqmirae/3278 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC@globalmktinsight/78122 Nov 2026, 06:39 UTC1.004 minutes
@eqmirae/3126 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC@qooowooo/52576 Aug 2026, 02:41 UTC1.0082 minutes
@eqmirae/3277 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 02:50 UTC@qooowooo/59282 Nov 2026, 03:02 UTC1.0012 minutes
@eqmirae/3278 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC@qooowooo/59312 Nov 2026, 06:39 UTC1.004 minutes
@eqmirae/3286 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 04:09 UTC@qooowooo/59495 Nov 2026, 04:31 UTC1.0022 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@globalmktinsight17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0019 minutesthis entry (11–6)
@qooowooo7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0014 minutesthis entry (5–2)
@cjdbj5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 143 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

22,26622,71922,492.56 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net +396. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,198–22,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 22:1722,719+55
9 Nov 2026, 22:0722,664+16
8 Nov 2026, 15:4722,648-1
7 Nov 2026, 06:5922,649+4
6 Nov 2026, 09:3122,645-1
5 Nov 2026, 09:1722,646+6
4 Nov 2026, 07:1822,640+10
3 Nov 2026, 07:2022,630+19
2 Nov 2026, 08:4422,611+3
1 Nov 2026, 09:0922,608+2
31 Oct 2026, 06:4422,606+8
30 Oct 2026, 04:0722,598-4
29 Oct 2026, 04:1022,602+5
28 Oct 2026, 02:4822,597+38
27 Oct 2026, 02:4522,559-5
25 Oct 2026, 23:1622,564+5
25 Oct 2026, 02:1722,559-4
24 Oct 2026, 04:3022,563-7
23 Oct 2026, 07:1722,570-3
22 Oct 2026, 10:3722,573first reading

Engagement

156 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 22,719 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,940
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
54
of 156 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held156 (29 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total196,830
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 04:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈269
Videos
≈1
Links
≈2,070

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 22:19 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 12 November 2026

[11/12 (목), 미래에셋증권 퀀트 Daily] 신용잔고/공매도잔고 모니터링 (신용잔고비율, 11/11 기준) KOSPI: 19.77조원 / 0.46% (1주일 전 0.48%, 1개월 전 0.55%) KOSDAQ: 5.75조원 / 1.43% (1주일 전 1.60%, 1개월 전 1.60%) (공매도잔고비율, 11/6 기준) KOSPI200: 14.11조원 / 0.37% (1주일 전 0.32%, 1개월 전 0.33%) KOSDAQ150: 4.62조원 / 2.29% (1주일 전 2.19%, 1개월 전 2.12%) (신용잔고비율 ↑) SK오션플랜트, 엘앤씨바이오, 쏠리드, 피엔티, 비에이치, LS머트리얼즈, 고영, 디아이, 알테오젠, 에스피지 (신용잔고비율 상승폭 ↑) 엑시콘, 인바디, 한화솔루션, 삼양식품, NHN, 리브스메드, 효성, …

Signed 명간 유

11 Nov 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 12 November 2026

[2027년 연간전망] 채권 The Trojan Horse: 성장의 이면에 진입 *안녕하세요, 미래에셋증권 민지희 입니다. 2027년 연간전망 자료를 발간했습니다. *빅테크 FCF 흐름과 반도체 수출 호조가 내수로 확산되는 강도가 2027년 채권시장의 주요 변수입니다. *현재 시장의 컨센서스는 2027년 하이퍼스케일러의 FCF가 적자를 기록한 후 AI 수익성을 검증해 가며 28년 흑자 전환입니다. 금리 및 실적 충격 스트레스 테스트 결과, 하이퍼스케일러의 실적이 컨센서스 대비 40% 이상 하회할 경우 28년 FCF 흑자 전환 달성이 어려운 것으로 나타났습니다. *2027년 미국 경제 성장률은 2% 초반을 예상합니다. 상반기에는 인플레이션 경계감과 채권 공급 부담이 이어지겠으나, 하반기에는 AI 투자의 성장 기여도가 낮아지며 경기 모멘텀…

Signed 명간 유

11 Nov 2026, 00:09 UTC≈2,460 viewsread 12 November 2026

[11/11 (수), 미래에셋증권 퀀트 Daily] 외국인/기관 수급 모니터링 (외국인 연속 순매수) 씨어스, 제주항공, 대한광통신, 팬오션, 한라캐스트 (외국인 연속 순매도) 지엔씨에너지, 심텍, 한화솔루션, SGC에너지, 파마리서치, 대한유화, 엘앤씨바이오, 비나텍 (기관 연속 순매수) 지엔씨에너지, 제주항공, 한미약품, 나노신소재, 대한유화, SGC에너지, 씨에스윈드, GS건설, 진에어, LG유플러스, 파마리서치, 자이에스앤디, NHN (기관 연속 순매도) 티엘비, 씨엠티엑스, 오킨스전자, GS피앤엘, 삼아알미늄, 리브스메드, 파두 자세한 데이터는 아래 링크를 참고해 주시길 바랍니다. ▶퀀트 Daily (2026/11/11, 수요일) https://han.gl/jqo18 *미래에셋증권 전략/퀀트 t.me/eqmirae 감사…

Signed 명간 유

10 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTCviews —

[미래에셋증권 전략/퀀트 유명간] pinned «[2027년 주식시장 전망] From Volatility to Value 미래에셋증권 투자전략/퀀트 유명간 *2027년 전망 보고서를 발간했습니다. 1) 변동성 함정, 2) 펀더멘털로 회귀, 3) 선호 업종 및 Top Picks로 구성했습니다. *파트 1에서는 ”변동성“을 중점적으로 다뤘습니다. 코스피 12MF PER은 3배 중후반으로 사상 최저 수준이지만 외국인은 올해 219조원을 순매도했습니다. *외국인 매도의 이유는 변동성입니다. 포트폴리오…»

9 Nov 2026, 23:24 UTC≈7,580 viewsread 12 November 2026

[2027년 주식시장 전망] From Volatility to Value 미래에셋증권 투자전략/퀀트 유명간 *2027년 전망 보고서를 발간했습니다. 1) 변동성 함정, 2) 펀더멘털로 회귀, 3) 선호 업종 및 Top Picks로 구성했습니다. *파트 1에서는 ”변동성“을 중점적으로 다뤘습니다. 코스피 12MF PER은 3배 중후반으로 사상 최저 수준이지만 외국인은 올해 219조원을 순매도했습니다. *외국인 매도의 이유는 변동성입니다. 포트폴리오 이론상 적정 투자 비중은 기대수익률에 비례하고 변동성 제곱에 반비례하기 때문입니다. *외국인에게 한국 주식 보유 비용인 VKOSPI(지수 변동성+공포 프리미엄)는 장기 평균 20pt에서 올해 평균 59pt로 높아졌습니다. 반면, 미국 VIX는 올해 평균 18pt입니다. VKOSPI − VIX는…

Signed 명간 유

9 Nov 2026, 23:23 UTC≈2,340 viewsread 12 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed 명간 유

9 Nov 2026, 22:17 UTC≈2,680 viewsread 12 November 2026

[11/10 (화), 미래에셋증권 퀀트 Daily] 실적 컨센서스 변화 및 속도로 본 이익모멘텀 (상향 전환) 포스코퓨처엠, 카카오뱅크, 한국타이어앤테크놀로지, 씨에스윈드, GS리테일, 한올바이오파마, 현대백화점, 카카오게임즈 (상향 가속) SK하이닉스, 삼성물산, HMM, S-Oil, 한화시스템, GS, SK바이오팜, 대우건설, 팬오션, 녹십자, HD현대마린엔진, CJ CGV, 디아이, 제주항공, 인바디, 컴투스, 진에어 (상향 둔화) 삼성전기, KB금융, 셀트리온, 삼성SDI, 삼성화재, POSCO홀딩스, LS ELECTRIC, LG화학, 삼성E&A, 포스코인터내셔널, LG씨엔에스, LG유플러스, 한미약품, NC, 대덕전자, 코스맥스, 피에스케이, LX인터내셔널, 하이트진로, RFHIC, 비에이치아이, 펌텍코리아, 나이스정보통신 (…

Signed 명간 유

9 Nov 2026, 01:03 UTC≈2,500 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @mirae_dm

<중간선거 이후 민주당 흐름 읽기> 자료 링크: https://han.gl/XnO9J 지난주 중간선거에서 민주당의 선전으로 주식 시장이 부정적으로 반응했습니다. 2028년 블루웨이브도 유력해진 만큼 민주당 정책에 대한 높은 민감도는 당분간 지속될 전망입니다. 관련해 향후 지켜봐야 하는 민주당내 성향 변화(중도 vs 진보), 공화당이 사수한 텍사스 상원이 주지사를 제어할 수 있는 범위, 선거 이후 트럼프 행정부의 동기 등을 다룬 자료를 작성했습니다. 많은 관심 부탁드립니다. 예상보다 큰 격차로 상하원을 확보한 민주당: 높아진 2028 블루웨이브 가능성 미국 중간선거에서는 예상보다 큰 차이로 민주당이 상하원을 모두 확보. 상원 54~56석, 하원은 현재 254석을 확보해 과반(218석)을 월등히 상회 2028년에 상원선거 구조도 민주당에 …

Signed 명간 유

8 Nov 2026, 23:30 UTC≈2,590 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @opendisco

📈 주간 영업이익 전망치 모멘텀 [10/30~11/6] · 상향 91 / 하향 145 / 유지 323 코스피 영업이익 전망치 상향 Top 10 🔼 • 풍산홀딩스 +24.3% — 1,183→1,470억 • DL +17.6% — 5,610→6,600억 • 제주항공 +8.9% — 1,170→1,274억 • 효성 +7.7% — 5,745→6,190억 • SK이노베이션 +7.5% — 6.73→7.23조 • S-Oil +6.8% — 3.60→3.84조 • 대덕전자 +6.6% — 4,206→4,484억 • KG스틸 +5.3% — 1,647→1,734억 • HS효성첨단소재 +4.5% — 2,485→2,596억 • SK +4.4% — 11.03→11.52조 코스닥 영업이익 전망치 상향 Top 10 🔼 • 카카오게임즈 +40.4% — 780→1,096억 •…

Signed 명간 유

8 Nov 2026, 22:10 UTC≈2,750 viewsread 12 November 2026

[11/9 (월), 미래에셋증권 퀀트 Daily] 시장/업종 쏠림 지표 모니터링 (시장 쏠림 지표, 11/6 기준) KOSPI: -1.02 (1주일 전 -0.82, 1개월 전 -0.45) KOSDAQ: -1.48 (1주일 전 -1.28, 1개월 전 -0.91) (쏠림 지표 ↑) (쏠림 지표 상승폭 ↑) 소프트웨어, 건강관리, 운송 자세한 데이터는 아래 링크를 참고해 주시길 바랍니다. ▶퀀트 Daily (2026/11/09, 월요일) https://han.gl/DUpLt *미래에셋증권 전략/퀀트 t.me/eqmirae 감사합니다.

Signed 명간 유

7 Nov 2026, 08:18 UTCviews —

[미래에셋증권 전략/퀀트 유명간] pinned «[미래에셋증권 전략/퀀트 유명간] 주간 이익동향(11월 2주차) ★ Summary ★ [글로벌] 이익모멘텀 개선 흐름. 대만/한국/일본↑ [한국] 4Q26, 27년 실적 상향 조정. 에너지/화학/반도체/게임↑ ■ 글로벌 이익동향 및 밸류에이션(MSCI, 12MF EPS) * 전세계 EPS 변화율(1M) : +1.1%(DM: +0.9%, EM: +1.9%) * 컨센서스 상향 국가(1M) : 대만(+3.9%), 한국(+3.3%), 일본(+1.5%)…»

7 Nov 2026, 07:06 UTC≈6,760 viewsread 12 November 2026

[미래에셋증권 전략/퀀트 유명간] 주간 이익동향(11월 2주차) ★ Summary ★ [글로벌] 이익모멘텀 개선 흐름. 대만/한국/일본↑ [한국] 4Q26, 27년 실적 상향 조정. 에너지/화학/반도체/게임↑ ■ 글로벌 이익동향 및 밸류에이션(MSCI, 12MF EPS) * 전세계 EPS 변화율(1M) : +1.1%(DM: +0.9%, EM: +1.9%) * 컨센서스 상향 국가(1M) : 대만(+3.9%), 한국(+3.3%), 일본(+1.5%), 미국(+0.8%) * 컨센서스 하향 국가(1M) : 중국(-1.2%), 독일(-0.3%) * 선진국 컨센서스 상향/하향 업종(1M) : 에너지(+9.4%), IT(+1.4%), 산업재(+0.4%) / 소재(-0.8%), 경기소비재(-0.7%), 컴즈(-0.4%) * 신흥국 컨센서스 상…

Signed 명간 유

Showing the 12 most recent of 156 posts we hold for @eqmirae. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @eqmirae as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
24 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[미래에셋증권 전략/퀀트 유명간]” (@eqmirae), 22,719 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eqmirae.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.