Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Юра, не волнуйся!

@uravseok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,763subscribers

-74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001414343240
TypeChannel
Username@uravseok
DescriptionЯ Марина, пишу про digital-мир и как развивать телеграм канал. Консультирую Система развития и монетизации каналов: https://paywall.pw/uravseok Автор подкаста: https://clck.ru/3FjPn9 Услуги: https://uravseok.ru/ РКН: https://clck.ru/3FjPhy 👾@marinavseok
Created19 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/uravseok

Growth

15,76315,83715,8006 August 2026 — 15,837 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,828 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,827 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,819 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,800 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,787 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,773 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,763 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,752–15,848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:3415,763-10
11 Aug 2026, 14:1815,773-14
10 Aug 2026, 16:5615,787-13
9 Aug 2026, 19:1115,800-19
8 Aug 2026, 20:1715,819-8
7 Aug 2026, 22:5815,827-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:1015,828-9
6 Aug 2026, 06:1615,837first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.02%
avg views ÷ 15,763 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held51 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total72,548
Reactions total2,301
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,390
Videos
955
Links
2,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
56s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,582 reactions across 38 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁58537.0%
42226.7%
🔥28918.3%
👍925.82%
😱513.22%
🥰513.22%
🤯472.97%
😢342.15%
🤔60.379%
🐳50.316%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC456 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026

X перестаёт платить просто за охваты и отдельно вводит оплату за оригинальный контент. Копипаст, перезаливы, слегка переделанный чужой контент и подборки без собственного вклада не будут считаться оригинальными. Причём анализ новости, комментарий и собственная интерпретация считаются. Вот это, мне кажется, очень важный сигнал. Платформы начали войну с контентными паразитами. Например, отказываются платить за то, чт

🔥15🥰6👍1

12 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC719 views63 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Почему нельзя нормально то разговаривать?

😁52🔥83

12 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC802 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Spotify начнет отмечать ИИ-исполнителей тегом AI Persona и запретит их музыку в своих редакционных и алгоритмических рекомендациях.

🔥12👍74

12 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,040 views63 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Во времена были!

😁535😢4🐳1

12 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈1,050 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Кажется, у OpenAI случился свой «Куршевель». Компания собрала около 30 инфлюенсеров и отправила их на первый большой бренд-трип: дорогой отель, красивые ужины, велнес, подарки, активности и знакомство с продуктами OpenAI. В теории - идеальная рекламная поездка. В реальности - волна хейта. И по той же причине: отрыв компании от реальности. И вся история очень напоминает российский кейс с поездкой Rendez-Vous в Курш

👍95😢4

12 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,290 views98 reactionsread 13 August 2026

⚡️Бывших адвокатов Саши Митрошиной приговорили к четырём годам колонии. Ольгу Гольцеву и Алису Волхову взяли под стражу прямо в зале суда по делу о мошенничестве на 41 млн рублей. По версии суда, они убедили блогершу передать им деньги якобы на «взятки чиновникам» и «защиту от налоговой». Никаких вопросов в итоге не решили, а деньги присвоили. С Гольцевой взыскали 21,5 млн рублей, с Волховой — 20,1 млн.

🤯47🔥29😱192😁1

12 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,320 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Как я и предполагала, рынок инфлюенс маркетинга стабилизируется к осени-зиме. Мы перестали страдать, собрали себя в руки, кто-то сошел с дистанции, а кто-то забрал себе освободившееся внимание, потребности аудитории и место в нише, нашли новые пути и адаптировались. Большинство авторов сейчас пытаются делать ЧТО-ТО, но все это похоже на муравьиные бега в суете. Сначала нужно выстроить систему: я готовила вам большо

12🔥6🥰5

12 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC≈1,150 views56 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Именно так и было.

😁533

11 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,180 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Как получить 480+ видео для соцсетей со стоимостью просмотра от 38 копеек? Пока одни бренды продолжают вкладываться в дорогостоящие съемки и разовые интеграции, другие выстраивают систему, которая позволяет регулярно получать сотни новых рекламных креативов, масштабировать контент и снижать стоимость просмотра. 14 августа в 14:00 WOWBLOGGER проведет бесплатный вебинар «Как получить 480+ видео для соцсетей без прода

10🥰7🔥6

11 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,130 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⚡️«Авито Реклама» запустила таргетинг по ключевым словам. Теперь рекламодатели смогут показывать рекламу пользователям на основе их поисковых запросов на платформе. Инструмент позволяет работать с уже сформированным спросом: от конкретных товаров и услуг до смежных категорий и более узких сегментов аудитории. Источник.

11🔥5👍4

11 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,180 views138 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

В удивительное время живем)

😁9528🔥15

11 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈1,180 views70 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Знали бы вы как я бежала за гладиолусами вчера! И как я пищала, когда меня ждали эти красавцы! Купила их, картошки, лисичек и безумно красивых помидоров, нажарила, ела и любовалась. Как же я люблю лето, за что оно с нами так плохо поступает в этом году со своей капризной погодой..

44🥰14🔥12

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @uravseok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,815 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Lyalinanatalie
@lyalina_natalie · 291,497
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 11 August 2026
Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 155,877
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юра, не волнуйся!” (@uravseok), 15,763 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uravseok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.