Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 45 days, net -435. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,777–49,342 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 16:14
48,842
-9
17 Sept 2026, 06:21
48,851
-16
15 Sept 2026, 08:16
48,867
-14
13 Sept 2026, 13:58
48,881
-34
11 Sept 2026, 20:38
48,915
-43
9 Sept 2026, 06:56
48,958
-28
6 Sept 2026, 00:55
48,986
-20
4 Sept 2026, 00:41
49,006
-21
2 Sept 2026, 13:36
49,027
-5
1 Sept 2026, 11:08
49,032
-15
31 Aug 2026, 10:27
49,047
-11
30 Aug 2026, 07:49
49,058
-3
29 Aug 2026, 04:24
49,061
-4
28 Aug 2026, 05:25
49,065
-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:27
49,066
-15
26 Aug 2026, 04:42
49,081
-9
25 Aug 2026, 02:27
49,090
-53
23 Aug 2026, 18:24
49,143
-6
22 Aug 2026, 01:59
49,149
-13
20 Aug 2026, 17:36
49,162
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 103 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
53.9%
avg views ÷ 48,842 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,300
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
57 (22 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
710,720
Reactions total
12,985
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 06:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,280
Videos
≈493
Links
≈1,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
26,430 reactions across 56 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
8,721
33.0%
❤
7,042
26.6%
😢
1,560
5.90%
👍
1,490
5.64%
🔥
1,465
5.54%
🙏
1,304
4.93%
👏
926
3.50%
🕊
896
3.39%
🤯
853
3.23%
🤬
792
3.00%
😱
557
2.11%
🤮
334
1.26%
🎉
218
0.825%
🤔
213
0.806%
🥰
37
0.14%
🤩
22
0.083%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,430 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
5.26%
3 of 57 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
26,300
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
25,300
over 53 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5wVV2Je
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
2VSb5yTimHk
1
22 July 2026
22 July 2026
2VSb5yvu6yp
1
8 September 2026
8 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
КАНЬЕ.
Представьте на секунду, что это все прогрев, и за день до концерта они снимают промо, где Канье спиной стоит у Газпром арены.
Я бы тогда сняла все свои шляпы, а их у меня множество. Голосуем:
Будет концерт24%
Нет, концерта не будет77%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вообще я сколько себя помню, всегда говорила, что в жизни главное - научиться вовремя послать нахуй того, кто это заслужил.
И вот тогда счастье, радость, спокойствие и жизнь играет яркими красками.
Вы просто подумайте, скольких вы не послали, и 100% об этом вспоминаете с сожалением.
Абсолютно не стесняйтесь никого послать, мудакам строго необходимо сообщить, что они мудаки, иначе никак.
Следите за руками: Юра Дудь, который новый террорист и экстремист, берет интервью у Джигана, который просто ебанулся из-за наркоты.
Не удивлюсь, если снято было 2 интервью, Морген и он.
Если я окажусь права, это будет самым рейтинговым видео года в России в YouTube.
Спорить готова.
Открыла для себя Раевского, несу вам в клюве сеанс полуторачасовой терапии, тревожным смотреть вне очереди, без регистрации и смс
Под его спокойный голос уснете как младенцы возможно, но как проснетесь, досмотрите до конца
Статистика говорит, что YouTube стали после замедления смотреть еще больше.
Особенно в сравнении с RUTUBE.
Ну просто назло бабушке уши отморожу, не иначе.
Вчера я досмотрела сериал «Холод», пусть создатели не обижаются, ведь моя боль после просмотра последней серии все равно больше их рейтингов.
Первые три серии - топ. Красавица Люба Аксенова, потрясающая Линда Лапиньш, очень страшная Гузеева, которую реально боишься, сам сюжет, завязка действия, а потом…
А ЧТО ПРОИСХОДИТ ПОТОМ?
Марвел - это меньшая фантастика в сравнении со следующими сериями. Ноль логики в действия…
Только прилетела и уже стою в длиннющей очереди на избирательный участок. Двигается она медленно, но люди окружают весьма приятные.
Голосовать онлайн не люблю, я та еще бабка.
Несколько лет назад мы с друзьями ехали по трассе в Ярославской области и стали свидетелями почти идентичной ситуации.
Женщина ночью сбила лося, лось валялся на дороге, легковушка в ночи не заметила и улетела за ограждение прям на наших глазах, как в кино, отвечаю.
Все из людей, к счастью, остались живы.
Но я тогда очень сильно охренела и теперь побаиваюсь такого.
Мне еще тогда ребята сказали, что если лось умер, то …
😱210😢33❤14👍1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @karavanahuitelnyhistoriy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
КАНЬЕ.
Представьте на секунду, что это все прогрев, и за день до концерта они снимают промо, где Канье спиной стоит у Газпром арены.
Я бы тогда сняла все свои шляпы, а их у меня множество. Голосуем:
Будет концерт24%
Нет, концерта не будет77%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Караван Бьюти Ченэл @fursanastasia · 47,741 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
mariiarichard @mariiarichard · 22,287 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026
NASTIKA @nnastika · 26,081 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Принцесса Verandot @princessaverandot · 54,737 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Maisto @igormaisto · 103,538 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
Администрация Аншлага @klaragavrilovnanews · 157,158 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Дневник Аминема @aminanewss · 22,808 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
КОСАТКИНА @kosatka_nika · 30,766 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
Скромное Обаяние Пацана @kukan_sportif · 38,225 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Зинануёбтвоюмать @zinanuebtvoumatt · 30,661 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
Vovchenkomarina @vovchenkomarina_official · 36,308 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
Krasnova_Natasha @KrasnovaNatasha_official · 74,162 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
Варвина Наталья @varvina_n · 194,445 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
КУРЯТНИК @kurmedia · 31,567 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
В глазах потемнело @vglazax · 30,223 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 September 2026
stasprostoklass @stasprostoklass · 32,511 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
ZAVOROVSKAYA @zavorovska · 121,135 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Барышня шутить изволит @baryshnya_shutit · 45,494 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
Pilip_plein @pilip_plein · 43,464 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 31 August 2026
Пролетарии всех стран @proletariyi · 25,821 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
ХАЙЛАЙТЕР @goshakartsevcalling · 40,066 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ @dmitry_lukyanchuk · 125,160 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
Olechkin_durdom @olechkindurdom · 52,001 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Только никому... @spletni_tg · 187,952 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 108 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Караван Ахуительных Историй” (@karavanahuitelnyhistoriy), 48,842 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karavanahuitelnyhistoriy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.