Channel
@borodapodruga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,947subscribers
+36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001952518716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @borodapodruga |
| Description | По всем вопросам - @bptvoya. Авторский блог Гордея для девочек. Юмор, поддержка, жизнь, стеб. Канал 18+ МЕРЧ: https://t.me/merch_bp Менеджеры:https://t.me/managers_bp РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6734b9e7549f144bb52b8b33®istryType=bloggers |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/borodapodruga |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 14,947 | +6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 14,941 | +10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 14,931 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 14,923 | +23 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 14,900 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 14,901 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 14,904 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 14,911 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (2 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 99,735 |
| Reactions total | 8,358 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,358 reactions across 53 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5298567339074149024 | 4,934 | 59.0% | |
| custom 5305342555494305242 | 2,302 | 27.5% | |
| custom 5375609096630194510 | 465 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5467901265147092115 | 290 | 3.47% | |
| custom 5213418753437487732 | 148 | 1.77% | |
| custom 5377756614637933920 | 94 | 1.12% | |
| custom 5449905837508156483 | 82 | 0.981% | |
| custom 5298794658808223150 | 43 | 0.514% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @borodapodruga. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Почему люди переняли от собак только позы в сексе, вместо того, чтобы научиться преданности и верности друг другу.
custom 530534255549430524277custom 529856733907414902415custom 53756090966301945109custom 54679012651470921154custom 52134187534374877321
Сестра, ты королева пиздаболов, там где они воздух гоняли, ты ураганы крутила. Переиграешь, как бы они не старались.
custom 529856733907414902472custom 530534255549430524215custom 53756090966301945106
Когда жизнь идет по пизде, вспомни, что ты молодая, красивая и всегда находишь выходы, даже там ,где другие не видят.
custom 530534255549430524288custom 537560909663019451010custom 54679012651470921158
💔 Не получается построить счастливые отношения? Кажется, что вы постоянно притягиваете «не тех» людей? Повторяются одни и те же сценарии, а найти гармонию никак не получается? 💡 Возможно, ответы скрыты гораздо глубже, чем кажется. Протестируйте цифровую нейропсихологию на себе и получите ответы на вопросы, которые давно вас беспокоят. 🎁 **Сейчас вы можете получить БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ персональный разбор по дате рождения, …
custom 53053425554943052426custom 54679012651470921152custom 53756090966301945101
С парнем нужно играть в «крестики-нолики». Если ты для него нолик, то нужно ставить на нём крестик. Все просто.
custom 529856733907414902487custom 530534255549430524237custom 546790126514709211510custom 53756090966301945102
Спишь? Или в мак за чизбургерами поедем? 😏
custom 529856733907414902461custom 530534255549430524221custom 537560909663019451013
Скинь ему, а то расслабился что-то ☺
custom 530534255549430524283custom 529856733907414902450custom 53777566146379339208custom 53756090966301945104custom 52134187534374877321
Люди, буквально, придумали кофе без кофеина, молоко без лактозы, сладкое без сахара, а зарплату без работы, так никто и не придумал. Что за ерунда вот??
custom 5298567339074149024119custom 537560909663019451015custom 530534255549430524214
Девочки, я в шоке, когда узнал, что эрекция у мужика может довести до скорой. А ещё, что член по твердости должен быть, как огурец, ну или как неспелый банан. Что отсутствие утренней эрекции — это уже проблема, упустишь её — протез. И что в каждом третьем случае бесплодия у пары виноват мужчина, и по факту сначала стоит проверить его. Короче, мужское тело сигналит постоянно. Проблема в том, что эти сигналы никто …
custom 530534255549430524220custom 54679012651470921155custom 53756090966301945104
Надоело однообразие… Сейчас пойду и вынесу мусор без трусов.
custom 5298567339074149024134custom 537560909663019451011custom 53777566146379339209custom 53053425554943052421
Господи, пошли ей уже мужика, который хочет зарабатывать бабки, жрать и трахаться. А то все эти мальчики с тонкой и ранимой душой выебали ей весь мозг.
custom 5305342555494305242177custom 529856733907414902439custom 537560909663019451023
Все говорят, что у тебя тяжелый характер, а ты ни разу не выбила никому зубы и не стреляла по ногам. Но я знаю, тебе очень хотелось.
custom 5298567339074149024137custom 530534255549430524229custom 537775661463793392011custom 53756090966301945108
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @borodapodruga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❗️❗️❗️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 894,217 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БОРОДАТАЯ ПОДРУГА” (@borodapodruga), 14,947 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borodapodruga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.