Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Джейн он Эйр

Channel

Джейн он Эйр

@thejaneonair

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,321subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001912521019
TypeChannel
Username@thejaneonair
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thejaneonair

Growth

6,3216,3446,332.57 August 2026 — 6,341 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,344 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,337 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,324 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,321 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,318–6,347 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:246,321-3
14 Aug 2026, 13:536,324-13
11 Aug 2026, 11:046,337-7
8 Aug 2026, 02:386,344+3
7 Aug 2026, 11:166,341first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 6,321 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,790
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held24 (2 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total26,900
Reactions total1,687
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,843 reactions across 24 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,11539.2%
🤣47016.5%
🔥39213.8%
34212.0%
👍2548.93%
1194.19%
🤔692.43%
👀451.58%
👏240.844%
😍110.387%
🥰20.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,843reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC379 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @maximalno_nasha

«Хочу подумать об тебя». Это формулировка, которую я часто использую, чтобы написать любой текст, который пока не сформирован у меня в голове. «Подумать об кого-то» значит высказать идею, выслушать обратную связь (даже если это «ага и угу»), проговорить ключевые моменты и в итоге прийти к тому, что ты хочешь сказать. Я в этом ключе взаимодействую с приятельницами-блогерами, с близкими друзьями, со своими авторами в

21🔥13👍1👏1

11 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC770 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Никогда такого не было и вот опять.

🤣44

11 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC861 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @otsosiskaPhoto

кроме последнего пункта всё делал, а этот пункт вроде вообще не из нашей лесополосы

👍50🔥216

10 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈1,070 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Роскошно!

🤣73👍19🔥84😁4😍1

2 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,090 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @antonovbezb

Почему мошенник «отпетый»? Кто его отпел? Как пишет лингвист Виктор Виноградов, «отпетый» в значении «безнадежно-неисправимый, отъявленный» связано именно с похоронными обрядами, которые совершались перед тем, как совершить погребение. Иными словами, «отпетый» [негодяй] — тот, кто в переносном смысле умер для общества, человек недостойный жить рядом с другими людьми. Но интересно, что у этого слова есть и другое зн

60👍186🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,980 views119 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @etzvezdetsVideo

Это очень смешно 😂

😁102👍122🔥21

30 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC≈2,200 views151 reactionsread 12 August 2026

И ещё милое про Чехова. Он пользовался огромной популярностью у женщин, вокруг него вечно вились дамы разной степени социальной ответственности, баб маэстро любил до потери пульса. И самых ярых его поклонниц сестра писателя, Мария Павловна Чехова, называла антоновками. Ну разве не очаровательно?

😁10423🔥184🥰2

30 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC≈2,110 views108 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кстати, довольно любопытно, какие слова использовали признанные мастера слова для описания этого процесса до активного внедрения слова «секс». Кроме обсценных, конечно. У Булгакова в «Собачьем сердце» машинистку «подвергали французской любви» — жуть что такое (на деле имелся в виду оральный секс, но глагол «подвергать» меня здесь восхищает). Бунин использовал слово «познать» в том самом, библейском, смысле. Набоко

🤔4826🔥15👀10😁72

30 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,870 views123 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Секс в России есть с 1960-х. ⠀ В смысле слово. В отдельных источниках оно встречается даже чуть раньше, но современное значение получает именно в этот период и с тех пор употребляется всё чаще. Пик популярности секса, конечно, приходится на начало XXI века, а сейчас у нас начался режим «прости, Юра, мы всё проебали»: секс-блогеры вообще вынуждены заменять это слово в инстаграме каким-нибудь кексом или звёздочками, чт

🔥61😁34138👏5👀1👍1

30 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,570 views196 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @usywilly

По Паше Дурову - я бы не стал так бодро прыгать на человека, у которого есть доступ ко всем моим перепискам (а ещё и перепискам всей власти, кроме разве что Путина). Приходишь домой довольный, я сделяль, открываешь новости - а там полная коллекция дикпиков Госдумы, по фракциям. Домашнее порно руководства Роскомнадзора (с собаками и какаду Борисом). Свингер-пати руководства целого силового ведомства в Эрмитаже. Вступ

🤣118😁63🔥8👏52

29 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC≈1,730 views116 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lenagovoriPhoto

Я извиняюсь, а слово «салфетки» вам чем не угодило?

😁76👀33👍52

28 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,880 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я сейчас в Торжке и с удивлением узнала от местных, что жителей этого города называют новоторами и новоторками. Потому что ранее город носил название Новый Торг.

🔥713813

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @thejaneonair. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,329,571 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алеся Петровна
@alesiapetrovna · 140,766
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Джейн он Эйр” (@thejaneonair), 6,321 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thejaneonair.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.