Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Нам нравится ♥️

@likeitvery

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,336subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001822001068
TypeChannel
Username@likeitvery
DescriptionЛаура и Оксана о том, что нам нравится. @krav4uko Оксана, всякое-разное @novokshchenova Наталья, реклама Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/679cbcdc4fb9d46696c237a7 #UHTJM
Created24 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/likeitvery

Growth

20,33620,36220,3496 August 2026 — 20,354 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,362 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,356 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,353 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,346 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,336 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,332–20,366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:2420,336-10
10 Aug 2026, 05:5520,346-7
9 Aug 2026, 08:3220,353-3
8 Aug 2026, 08:3620,356-6
7 Aug 2026, 11:2620,362+8
6 Aug 2026, 11:4820,354first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 20,336 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held31 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total78,634
Reactions total3,675
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9,280
Videos
2,470
Links
104

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 19s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,675 reactions across 31 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,52441.5%
😁82222.4%
🔥52414.3%
💯1564.24%
👍1524.14%
🤣1263.43%
🙈491.33%
🤯481.31%
🍾350.952%
🤔290.789%
280.762%
🥴250.68%
😍190.517%
🥰190.517%
🥱160.435%
👀150.408%
👌140.381%
👏130.354%
🗿110.299%
😐100.272%
9 further kinds401.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,675reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,250 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Странно, но ладно! По Нью-Йорку пустили кататься шарик из колтунов, чтоб прорекламировать средство для волос K18 и сыворотку FutureIQ Hair Longevity Serum.

🥴24😁13🙈9🤯2

12 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈1,810 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Еще одна сентябрьская обложка - Elle с Рианной. И ваши админы шокированы: не припомним, чтоб бренд вот так выносили на уровне логотипа издания…. Теперь даже интересно, сколько стоила реклама, еще и в сентябрьский номер.

🔥2917🤔9😢2

12 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈2,280 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В соцсетях атакуют новую обложку Vogue с Кайей Гербер и Гомером Гиром. Говорят, непозволительно скучно - снимать заглавный фичер сентябрьского номера на сером фоне. И громкое имя фотографа (снимал Стивен Мейзел) блогеров и фэшн-активистов только злит. В пример приводят обложку 1992-го с родителями Кайи и Гомера, говорят, она была намного интереснее!

42😱3💯1

12 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC≈2,770 views194 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Предупреждаем: никакой смысловой нагрузки видео не несет

😁12654🤣14

11 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC≈3,850 views168 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Теперь женаты! Роналду выложил совместный пост с Джорджиной. За 28 минут- больше 3 миллионов лайков!

120🍾357🥱6

11 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈3,340 views232 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Не надо объяснять же, правда?

140🔥68👍12😐6🙏5😍1

11 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC≈3,210 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Vogue расспросил Гербер и Гира (детей Синди Кроуфорд и Ричард) об их неожиданном партнерстве в кино, родителях (когда-то женатых) и сериале «Осколки». Надеемся, вы уже смотрите - проект получился, как и все произведения Райана Мерфи, очень стильным! Ну а обложка…довольно скучной! Странный выбор фонов для грандиозного сентябрьского номера…

65👌7👏3🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC≈2,390 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ohzinaPhoto

Полетели первые сентябрьские обложки (самые важные в сезоне), и вчера все дайджесты мусолили признание Брэда Питта из заглавной истории Esquire: он сообщил, что больше не трезвенник. Я изучила интервью целиком, и вот что еще говорит актер. Во-первых, он признается, что в свои 62 немного тоскует по пятому десятку, говорит, это было лучшее время, и советует всем «газовать» и успевать реализовывать проекты. Еще сообщает

72🔥12

10 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC434 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Просто лицо понедельника… Очень уставшего кота достали из машины на улице Гризодубовой. Утром мужчина собирался по делам, но из-под капота донеслось мяуканье. Пришлось снимать аккумулятор, но сам вытащить животное хозяин машины так и не смог. На помощь приехали спасатели. Судя по всему, кот домашний. Сейчас он находится у соседей.

14🥰3💔2

10 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,180 views51 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Брэд Питт и новый Esquire, maverick, кстати, на сленге означает «вольнодумец, одиночка, кто-то не в течении».

22🔥15😍14

10 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈1,800 views107 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Сен-Лоран и его любовь к лаку для волос! По воспоминаниям очевидцев, он мог использовать целый баллончик прямо на себя за один раз!

🤯40🙈28😁22🗿95🤷‍♀2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @likeitvery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@likeitvery edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,180 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 284,694
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 360,016
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
ЮЛИЯ МЕНЬШОВА
@JuliaMenshovaJulia · 361,530
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нам нравится ♥️” (@likeitvery), 20,336 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/likeitvery.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.