Канал о моде от журналиста @MadonnaMurr
Канал в MAX https://max.ru/MUR
Мадонна Мур в YouTube: https://youtube.com/c/MadonnaMur
Канал в реестре Роскомнадзора: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67376c8323bfbf2cbf4573d5®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
19 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 56 days, net -2,993. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207,320–211,211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Oct 2026, 07:18
207,769
-718
18 Sept 2026, 09:40
208,487
-120
16 Sept 2026, 03:18
208,607
-93
14 Sept 2026, 06:19
208,700
-112
12 Sept 2026, 11:20
208,812
-132
10 Sept 2026, 07:00
208,944
-193
7 Sept 2026, 01:59
209,137
-180
4 Sept 2026, 07:39
209,317
-91
2 Sept 2026, 23:05
209,408
-80
1 Sept 2026, 20:44
209,488
-47
1 Sept 2026, 00:07
209,535
-82
31 Aug 2026, 01:16
209,617
-77
30 Aug 2026, 02:47
209,694
-67
29 Aug 2026, 03:57
209,761
-71
28 Aug 2026, 02:43
209,832
-66
27 Aug 2026, 02:57
209,898
-27
26 Aug 2026, 03:54
209,925
-33
25 Aug 2026, 04:42
209,958
-67
24 Aug 2026, 04:05
210,025
-66
22 Aug 2026, 13:04
210,091
first reading
Engagement
393 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.8%
avg views ÷ 207,769 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,500
256 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
257
of 393 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held
393 (4 August 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total
6,273,274
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 21:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈62,800
Videos
≈3,790
Links
≈3,850
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
25m 41s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
1.02%
4 of 393 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
31,500
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
29,200
over 387 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjbtFfh5
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
2SDnje7Pgxj
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
2Vtzqv2esbq
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
2VtzqxmJZ87
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 393 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
#bestdressed недели от стилиста
Марины Рысевой
Коллекционировать фиты, теперь так заменяем слово силуэт, теплой осенью — моя страсть. Голые ноги, но на контрасте с фактурой кожи и меха. Предлагаю с них и начать: на вечеринке в честь новенького открытия бутика Walk of Shame, Дилара Наилевна появилась в шубке Laura Andraschko и туфлях August Barron. Глаша Гурьянова изобрела беременный образ и выгуляла меховое боа с пл…
Мода и искусство всегда шли рука об руку. Вспомним, например, тандем Эльзы Скиапарелли и Сальвадора Дали, или Ива Сен-Лорана вместе с Энди Уорхолом. В новом лукбуке «Искусство формы» от Lusio история продолжается. Бренд решил исследовать связь современного арта и моды в проекте «Women of Lusio».
Первой героиней стала галеристка Полина Аскери. Ее подход к гардеробу, как и к искусству – кураторский. Просматривая капсу…
Lamoda отмечает свое 15-летие большим светским ивентом — Гала-ужином. Fashion-вечер собрал селебрити разного калибра - от Ксении Собчак, Иды Галич до Кати Голден и Суада Муратовича. Но это тот самый редкий случай, когда на ивент приглашены и вы. Потому что мероприятие проходит В ИГРЕ!!
Классный формат отметить юбилей вместе со своими пользователями. Можно пройтись по красной ковровой дорожке вместе с любимой знаменит…
А вообще тексты Эстер Гориловской для меня большое открытие. Оказывается она умеет писать очень хорошую fashion-аналитику. Прочитайте ее блестящий пост у нас в канале про показ Matières Fécales. И сейчас вот Schiaparelli. Таких содержательных, с вниманием к деталям и отсылкам текстов в телеграме уже нет.
Это я сегодня выяснила, что Эстер — профессиональный журналист, и даже три года работала на Первом канале! Тепер…
Показ Schiaparelli s/s 27 глазами и кстати нашего внештатного корреспондента Эстер Гориловской, которая находится в Париже. Ей слово:
«В подвале Лувра, а тут в этот раз показ проходит, креативный директор Дэниел Роузберри соединяет французский характер дома Schiaparelli и его узнаваемого кутюра с попыткой разобрать его на части — отсюда и появления separates, вещей с фирменными силуэтами бренда. Плюс впервые в Sch…
А закончим день моим самым любимым показом в рамках MFW - Ruban. Шедеврально. Алиса и Юлия, спасибо!
Очень жаль, что не смогла увидеть коллекцию воочию, зафиксирую здесь.
Отбросив залетных прохожих, можно констатировать, что Московская неделя моды вполне себе прилично организована. Я насчитала с пятерку показов, которые мне показались очень достойными и значимыми в индустрии: это Ruban шедевральный и Viva Vox, Vereja с полком героинь на подиуме , карамельный Bitte_Ruhe, Masterpeace Евгении Линович.
На своей сессии BRICS+ Fashion Summit я выступала с руководителями Недель моды из Шри-…
На показе YANA не узнала Лизу Базыкину и Катю Клэп! Лизу показали выше, а вот Катя в расшитой камнями корейской шапочке оказалась соседкой по ряду. Самая концептуальная гостья, мое почтение! Кстати, никто не подрался, на показе у всех был первый ряд.
А мой костюм Lumique, кажется, ждал своего часа. И он случился под дресс-код black tuxedo suit. Плюс сумка Zarqua, камни и каф Letters and Stones
Роскошь, расшитая парча, мех, стразы, твид, бахрома. Лучше больше, чем меньше — такой девиз Яны Расковаловой и Даниила Берга, и кто мы такие чтобы отказываться. Показ - праздник. А люди какие красивые в зале!
Showing the 12 most recent of 393 posts we hold for @fashion_mur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fashion_mur edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 119 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 89 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
editors on vacation @editorsonvacation · 20,323 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
BURO. @Buro247_ru · 25,655 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
KK @kseniadenisovna · 33,667 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Печенюшки&Co @pechenuwki · 34,505 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
ШопагоLee @ShopahoLee · 44,262 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Mukhins @mukhinss · 54,986 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
superficial space cadet @superficialspacecadet · 24,767 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Olga Krayzman @olgakrayzman · 25,862 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Будни Гальяно @budnigalliano · 27,869 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
EvelinaFashionSchool @EvelinaFashionSchool · 82,472 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Историк Мод Анатоль Вовк @istorikmod · 25,968 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
VOGUE-religion @religion_vogue · 25,449 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
lamoda на связи @lamoda_na_svyazi · 44,534 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 27 August 2026
SALAVAT KYPERE @salavat_kypere · 46,579 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
The Blueprint News @theblueprintnews · 72,392 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
A L E K Ó @aleko_n17 · 102,738 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
Москва носит Биркин @mos_glyanec · 121,638 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Это Лиза @etolizochka · 120,950 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
Луис Иванович @LIVfashionmag · 202,818 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Сделай лицо попроще @straightface · 21,118 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 September 2026
Мамкина модница @mamkina · 30,134 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Вишлист @myhotelki · 48,517 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Модные хроники Злой Киски @zlayakiska · 73,552 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
Vrednayamoda / Вредная Мода @vrednayamoda · 188,094 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 671 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Бебутов, Трифон Михайлович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…которую кино отражает. — сказал Трифон Бебутов.{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/fashion_mur/64780|title=MUR|website=Telegram|access-date=2025-03-17}}В…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MUR” (@fashion_mur), 207,769 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fashion_mur.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
