Отвечайте! 💍

Channel
Быть одной — ЗБС
@homealoneee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,892subscribers
-388 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001369714164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @homealoneee |
| Description | Реанимация брошенок и разведенок 👌🏻💋 номер заявления: 4805016539 Обсудить — с @ellie_parker |
| Created | 1 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/homealoneee |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 27,892 | -31 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 27,923 | -11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 27,934 | -14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 27,948 | -15 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 27,963 | -24 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 27,987 | -10 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 27,997 | -21 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:26 | 28,018 | -13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:05 | 28,031 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 28,039 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 28,051 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 28,059 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 28,060 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 28,062 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 28,067 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 28,072 | -15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 28,087 | -15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 28,102 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 28,120 | -23 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 28,143 | first reading |
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.3%
- avg views ÷ 27,892 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,880
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 54 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 54 (2 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 57,520 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 129
- Videos
- 37
- Links
- 852
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 38s
- Average length
- 49s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.85%
- 1 of 54 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 3,100
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 3,520
- over 53 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGQ11rR | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
«Мы же взрослые люди» Один из основополагающих мужских аргументов при разводе на бесплатный секс всегда был: «мы же взрослые люди». Под бесплатным сексом я подразумеваю секс-онли — без близости, без совместности, без планов на жизнь, без романтики, без чувств. И, кстати, без денег тоже. Сунул-вынул-сбросил пар-ушел. Женщины, убеждающие себя, что их такое устраивает, а на деле хоть так пытающиеся добрать жалкую кру…
Почему сайты знакомств ассоциируются с помойкой? Но это не единственный мой вопрос. Как у людей, считающих дейтинг-приложения «мусоркой», это утверждение уживается тем фактом, что они сами там зависали? И, возможно, зависают и по сей день?) Получается, что какая-то ваша часть представляет собой маргинала, копающегося в отходах? Это такой вид самомазохизма? «Да, мир говно, я говно, так измажусь же я в говне, что ту…
Аскеза на дейтинг: результаты Обещала рассказать, как оно там, по ту сторону — когда ты и не в отношениях, и не в поиске, и не в дейтинге. Почему я пришла к выбору удалиться с сайтов знакомств? В первую очередь, по философским соображениям. Которые, если вкратце, гласят: ты или тот, у кого есть желаемое (даже если в реальности это пока не проявилось) — либо тот, у кого желаемого нет. В первом случае — ты просто в …
Стала той самой бабой, над которой ржала За семь или сколько там лет ведения канала я что только не простебала. И человеческое, слишком человеческое. И мужское, слишком мужское. И женское, слишком женское. Но, кажется, пришло время простебать саму себя)) Я смеялась над теми, кто на старте знакомства пишет, что хочет серьезных отношений. Типа: че вы такие душные, в знакомствах важна спонтанность. Я теперь: FWB ONS М…
Семья-муйня… бла бла бла При знакомстве обращаем внимание на действительно важные акценты 😎 Интересно, кто-то это лайкает? 🐶
Ясность это новая сексуальность как роскошь «А ещё думаю, неужели ЯСНОСТЬ в отношениях это настолько редкий ценный ресурс? Когда можно получить прямой ответ на прямой вопрос. Когда тебя предупреждают заранее. Когда спрашивают, как тебе будет комфортно. Когда можно обсуждать ВСЕ адекватно...» Это мы обсуждали сливы со свиданок до самого назначения свиданок (в том числе, что легче нести пургу, чем честно сказать, что…
«Прости, я зассал» Блин, мужики, это че, шутка такая? Вчера заблокировала соскокера (не того, из поста, нового), которому давала очки второго шанса, — за «извини, сегодня не могу». Сегодня читаю эту историю: «У меня в пьюр целых 3 недели был милаха, каких поискать: и самолётов инженер, и пунктуации чистый гений, и без «скинь фотку», в общем, было и о чем и к чему. Я размякла и пустила его в святое святых — Телеграм…
Чем мы разбаловали мужчин Если они хотят от нас эксклюзивных красивых фоток через пять минут диалога после знакомства (через десять надо уже ехать сексом трахаться) — значит, мужчины это откуда-то взяли. Значит, были прецеденты. Значит, появилось понимание, что так можно. Значит, это стало нормой. Да, знаю, теоретически на планете Земля еще должны остаться места, где наш амбициозный Васятка крутился бы на ментально…
А что нам взамен на фотки? По следам вчерашних обсуждений о требовании фоток. (Правильно подметила читательница: часто их не клянчат, не просят, а именно требуют в повелительном наклонении.) Что взамен — ничего, nothing, niente. Но тут я задумалась: а что, действительно, принято ожидать взамен, кроме фоток человека-паука? Фотки их торсов из спортзала? Но многим барышням не нравятся качки, им спокойнее с мишками, т…
«У нас же коннект, так что пришли фотки» Перестала кого-то искать, удалилась из дейтинг-приложний, но эхом какое-то общение с мужчинами и знакомства до меня долетают. Что является бесценным материалом для рефлексии 😈 Ситуация последних дней: я в рабочем огне, мужчина мне пишет: мммм красные каблуки, пришли фото лично для меня. Я: не до него мне. Он: ляляля, ну пришли фото, у меня же уже есть привилегия. Я: СТОП🫸 а …
Админ после тяжелого рабочего дня на каблуках. Хочу ваших красивых фоток и общения😅
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @homealoneee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@homealoneee edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 31 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 31 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@moscowtinderr · 740,982#1
@zapiski_man3 · 31,606#2
@neposlednielyudi · 57,679#3
@after40yo · 13,809#4
@femalememes · 407,543#5
@no_drama_plz · 37,497#6
@baryshnya_shutit · 45,538#7
@merzkiej · 33,275#8
@krupetskaya · 14,817#9
@lvira_lina_up · 18,600#10
@oskolkiblok · 58,807#11
@literallly_us · 5,002#12
@fantastic_mouse · 40,912#13
@lovergolubev · 112,484#14
@temalebedev · 970,618#15
@and_what_if_YES · 8,474#16
@elya_bulochka · 49,447#17
@piramidadushnoty · 2,551#18
@prinsessofprojections · 6,864#19
@dbeskromny · 152,577#20
@sale_caviar · 192,936#21
@psihozavr_dovzhenko · 15,973#22
@gavrilichevkirill · 22,848#23
@onwritingwell · 23,464#24
@the_suchka · 1,234#25
@nodramaplz_life · 1,553#26
@dukaliti · 122,992#27
@it_always_sunny · 8,710#28
@podkast45plus · 10,447#29
@neznakomye · 9,656#30
@daryabagaevaa · 12,958#31
@mortalbeauty · 46,391#32
@sncmag · 301,646#33
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402#34
@maximalno_nasha · 25,803#35
@luka_ebkov · 431,305#36
@bloodysx · 1,178,521#37
@spletni_tg · 187,952#38
@strelets_molodec · 354,527#39
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,622,630#40
@naumita · 59,917#41
@SubbotinaDasha · 20,844#42
@veronikastepanova20011 · 474,884#43
@zavorovska · 120,762#44
@igormaisto · 103,538#45
@princessaverandot · 54,737#46
@imnotbozhena · 504,326#47
@zhidkovskiy_talk · 575,554#48
@kureelka · 124,698#49
@twitt_ota · 331,915#50
@diana_udovichenko · 27,469#51
@olga_prokopova_s · 124,688#52
@uraspura · 15,592#53
@karavanahuitelnyhistoriy · 48,816#54
@tatlersheroine · 100,724#55
@bponline · 111,120#56
@svintrovert · 84,226#57
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390#58
@TinderSOS · 33,219#59
@beautymarginalia · 43,488#60
@istominakarina · 157,220#61
@prbezposhady · 151,691#62
@sashaonline · 86,506#63
@lider · 176,821#64
@KrasnovaNatasha_official · 74,162#65
@kartozz · 123,525#66
@fursanastasia · 47,741#67
@conflict_in · 49,458#68
@mat2chertyat · 18,033#69
@dash_kupi_garazh · 31,191#70
@neotvsego · 9,664#71
@zolotoygrek_life · 41,325#72
@dnevnik_zhen · 18,704#73
@kormilina · 17#74
@lenagovori · 19,015#75
@davletkill · 2,492#76
@evo_lutio · 59,149#77
@fyodorovass · 6,557#78
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,158#79
@u_not_my_world · 5,272#80
@thynk · 70,521#81
@kukan_sportif · 38,117#82
@crisisman · 44,962#83
@zhidkovskiy_beauty · 151,752#84
@uravseok · 15,603#85
@mash · 3,110,586#86
@minaevlife · 318,588#87
@fashion_mur · 208,487#88
@drunkfashion · 40,019#89
@ksbchk · 381,978#90
@goldchihuahua · 91,409#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@no_drama_plz · 37,497
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
@gavrilichevkirill · 22,848
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
@oskolkiblok · 58,807
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@zapiski_man3 · 31,606
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@merzkiej · 33,275
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@vanilchannel · 58,114
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@tania_govorit_channel · 20,571
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
@baryshnya_shutit · 45,538
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
@gromovproject · 30,552
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
@olga_prokopova_s · 124,688
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@fantastic_mouse · 40,912
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@m_sovetnik · 59,587
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
@bachinskaya_oxana · 69,728
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
@diana_udovichenko · 27,469
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@TinderSOS · 33,219
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
@lovergolubev · 112,484
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@mortalbeauty · 46,391
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@KrasnovaNatasha_official · 74,162
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
@pokornosttt · 42,081
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@o_svidaniyah_tg · 28,101
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
@females · 531,927
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@doc_Filatov · 28,103
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@ElizavetaUstyugova · 25,222
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
@maximalno_nasha · 25,803
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Быть одной — ЗБС” (@homealoneee), 27,892 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/homealoneee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.