Мелкокалиберные «пикми» ⚠️Внимание! Очень едкий пост! Слабонервным и справедливым лучше не читать!⚠️ Предмет беседы — «пикми»=«выбери меня»-женщины — обладательницы образа с призывной сексуальностью, легкой доступностью и подстройкой под мужчин. Важно: внешность там вовсе не с иголочки, я говорю про доступный вайб. Удивительные персонажи — тем, что бесят, кажется, всех. Ну ни у кого они не вызывают светлых или хот…

Channel
Быть одной — ЗБС
@homealoneee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,510subscribers
-770 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001369714164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @homealoneee |
| Description | Реанимация брошенок и разведенок 👌🏻💋 номер заявления: 4805016539 Обсудить — с @ellie_parker |
| Created | 1 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/homealoneee |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:05 | 27,510 | -23 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:07 | 27,533 | -14 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:11 | 27,547 | -10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:37 | 27,557 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 27,568 | -14 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 27,582 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:17 | 27,580 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 27,590 | -5 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:35 | 27,595 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 27,600 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 27,604 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 27,608 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:35 | 27,619 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:11 | 27,625 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 27,629 | -12 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:31 | 27,641 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 27,655 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 27,663 | -5 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 27,668 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 27,677 | first reading |
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 162 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.75%
- avg views ÷ 27,510 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,680
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 85 (2 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 53,648 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 138
- Videos
- 38
- Links
- 874
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 27s
- Average length
- 49s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.18%
- 1 of 85 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 3,100
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 3,620
- over 83 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGQ11rR | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (52.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Я знаете, чему иногда удивляюсь? Тому, насколько всё в мире относительно. Кто-то сгорает со стыда и не может попросить у кавалера хотя бы символический приятный подарок, так и не дожидается цветов на восьмое марта, стесняется заказать даже салат, чтобы не показаться «меркантильной»… А кто-то умудряется стричь мужчин так, что аж дым коромыслом! И при этом не обслуживая, не показывая стриптиз и не стараясь быть милой …
Дружеское напоминание женщинам, которые годами выбирали не тех И с которыми у них, естественно, ничего не получалось. И которые теперь боятся, что раз не получилось даже с обмудками, то о классных и мечтать нельзя. А еще для тех, кто при этом воспринимает одиночество как казнь, а не как возможность. «Если она не смогла завоевать любовь даже такого несчастного и незавидного мужчины, разве может она надеяться завоева…
Секс-волонтерки и флирт-аниматорши 🤹 Я даже особо ничего не хочу сказать, кроме как проконстатировать хорошие тенденции в обществе, по крайней мере, в соцсетях. Наблюдаю, виртуально уплетая виртуальный попкорн, и радуюсь. 🔴Потихоньку приходим к мысли, что никакой секс для никакого здоровья не интересен. И даже если интересен, то, знаете ли, это должно быть по высшему разряду, а не со среднестатистическим неумехой. …
Домохозяйки VS Отчаянные домохозяйки Что просто домохозяйка отличается от домохозяйки отчаянной? Просто домохозяйка не испытывает отчаяния 🤷🏻♀️😅 В том смысле, что метания ей несвойственны и чужды: под бронёй и фасадом счастливой жены и матери ангелочков она может проживать свой сорт трешанины, но никогда не выйдет из этой (сомнительной) зоны комфорта. Домохозяйку отчаянную отличает рефлексия. Хочу ли я так жить? С…
О запрете быть собой Теперь серьезный разговор. Вчера я узнала из комментариев, что Я пикми и ориентируюсь на мужчин — потому, что говорю такую простую и даже медицинскую истину о том, что неполезно есть углеводное и запивать алкоголем на ночь, в контексте свиданий и ажиотажа насчет тарелочниц. Хотя эту незамысловатую истину можно перенести на любой контекст — встречу с подругами, корпоратив — и от этого она не пер…
Вычислить тарелочницу 🛸⚔ Как мы понимаем, что вы, пацаны, говорите именно про тарелочниц? Даже если вы сами еще в шоке после «свидания» и не можете поверить, что вас «развела» она? Всё просто, и для этого не нужно припирать никого к стенке. Вы сами это говорите в ваших рассказах — а мы лишь делаем выводы по контексту. Смотрите, как обстоят дела. Адекватная женщина, которая следит за фигурой, не ест [поздно] вечеро…
Главная причина неудачных свиданий сегодня …это мужское враньё. Пусть ни один сервис знакомств больше никогда не возьмет у меня рекламу, но я ща скажу всё как есть. Дело в том, что та часть мужчин, от чьих анкет не хочется прополоскать экран в хлорке, стала здорово привирать. Но узнать масштаб лжи представляется возможным только на встрече. Они ставят другие имена. Листаешь и думаешь: «ты не Андрей», «ты не Олег»…
«Мужчин мало», «мужчины одни долб..бы» и прочее женское нытьё! (Мужское тоже) Я смотрю, в обществе назревает новый тренд. Ну как, новый 😹️️️️️️ «Почти все мужики кааазлыыыыы» — неважно, новое или хорошо забытое старое, — но об этом заговорили сами мужчины. Мол, бабы, вы правы: мы тут пообщались друг с другом на тему отношений и поняли, что мы действительно инфантилы, эгоисты и просто пупуни. Выбирать женщинам не из …
Быть одной — ЗБС pinned a photo
Трудно быть Богом Лениво быть женщиной Чтобы вы не читали все 800+ комментариев под прошлым постом о том, как же западло просить что-то у мужика типа на ноготочки, но и не хочется сидеть нищей в этом пока еще мужском мире, я сделаю сводку того, к чему мы пришли. Если вы с мужчиной ужимаетесь, жмётесь, подстраиваетесь, боитесь лишний раз пикнуть о своих желаниях; если вы знаете, что это всё бесполезно — это плохой з…
Женщина, которая не просит денег Друзья. Болючая тема. Получила неожиданный комплимент от самых лояльных читателей мужского пола: за то, что никогда не просила у мужчин денег, не скидывала номер карты, не жеманничала «на ноготочки» и не ожидала, что они финансово решат мои проблемы. Респект! Классно! У тебя есть чувство собственного достоинства! Да, ребят, сейчас бы получать дивиденды с собственного достоинства и…
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @homealoneee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@homealoneee edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 31 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 30 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 13 posts on @homealoneee as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 11 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 11 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 5
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@aicreator · 378,9731 postПро СВИДАНИЯ и ОТНОШЕНИЯ
@chatting_vibes · 3,4961 postДорогая Мышка
@fantastic_mouse · 38,2741 postИстина в уходе
@istina_v_uhode · 7,3651 postЕкатерина Крупецкая об отношениях
@krupetskaya · 15,4261 postПсихолог Людмила Головина
@ne_prodietu · 1,4891 postNO DRAMA
@nodramano · 6,7821 postAirin про отношения
@wqsjQ4Giexo0MGIy · 10,7361 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@moscowtinderr · 742,791#1
@zapiski_man3 · 31,230#2
@neposlednielyudi · 57,235#3
@after40yo · 13,673#4
@femalememes · 399,175#5
@no_drama_plz · 37,651#6
@baryshnya_shutit · 44,678#7
@merzkiej · 32,348#8
@krupetskaya · 15,426#9
@lvira_lina_up · 18,817#10
@oskolkiblok · 57,861#11
@literallly_us · 4,906#12
@fantastic_mouse · 38,274#13
@lovergolubev · 109,553#14
@temalebedev · 968,108#15
@and_what_if_YES · 8,359#16
@elya_bulochka · 48,239#17
@piramidadushnoty · 2,547#18
@prinsessofprojections · 6,765#19
@dbeskromny · 154,206#20
@sale_caviar · 192,540#21
@psihozavr_dovzhenko · 15,635#22
@gavrilichevkirill · 20,683#23
@onwritingwell · 23,401#24
@the_suchka · 1,214#25
@nodramaplz_life · 1,605#26
@dukaliti · 121,661#27
@it_always_sunny · 8,527#28
@podkast45plus · 10,155#29
@neznakomye · 9,538#30
@daryabagaevaa · 13,467#31
@mortalbeauty · 46,394#32
@sncmag · 299,576#33
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436#34
@maximalno_nasha · 25,456#35
@luka_ebkov · 429,055#36
@bloodysx · 1,172,884#37
@spletni_tg · 186,947#38
@strelets_molodec · 348,852#39
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,621,101#40
@naumita · 58,680#41
@SubbotinaDasha · 21,161#42
@veronikastepanova20011 · 485,372#43
@zavorovska · 118,785#44
@igormaisto · 102,865#45
@princessaverandot · 54,307#46
@imnotbozhena · 503,492#47
@zhidkovskiy_talk · 576,516#48
@kureelka · 124,115#49
@twitt_ota · 418,557#50
@diana_udovichenko · 27,303#51
@olga_prokopova_s · 121,159#52
@uraspura · 15,348#53
@karavanahuitelnyhistoriy · 48,443#54
@tatlersheroine · 102,534#55
@bponline · 111,510#56
@svintrovert · 83,318#57
@irena_ponaroshku · 279,168#58
@TinderSOS · 32,897#59
@beautymarginalia · 42,286#60
@istominakarina · 156,514#61
@prbezposhady · 151,213#62
@sashaonline · 86,007#63
@lider · 175,531#64
@KrasnovaNatasha_official · 73,436#65
@kartozz · 124,274#66
@fursanastasia · 46,139#67
@conflict_in · 49,584#68
@mat2chertyat · 17,742#69
@dash_kupi_garazh · 30,810#70
@neotvsego · 9,475#71
@zolotoygrek_life · 41,302#72
@dnevnik_zhen · 18,341#73
@kormilina · 7,835#74
@lenagovori · 18,818#75
@davletkill · 2,467#76
@evo_lutio · 58,737#77
@fyodorovass · 6,494#78
@klaragavrilovnanews · 156,602#79
@u_not_my_world · 5,239#80
@thynk · 69,386#81
@kukan_sportif · 37,922#82
@crisisman · 47,759#83
@zhidkovskiy_beauty · 149,775#84
@uravseok · 15,506#85
@mash · 3,140,033#86
@minaevlife · 317,610#87
@fashion_mur · 205,218#88
@drunkfashion · 40,061#89
@ksbchk · 381,288#90
@goldchihuahua · 91,212#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@no_drama_plz · 37,651
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
@gavrilichevkirill · 20,683
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
@oskolkiblok · 57,861
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@zapiski_man3 · 31,230
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@merzkiej · 32,348
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@vanilchannel · 56,334
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@tania_govorit_channel · 20,689
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
@baryshnya_shutit · 44,678
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
@gromovproject · 29,969
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
@olga_prokopova_s · 121,159
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@fantastic_mouse · 38,274
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@lvira_lina_up · 18,817
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 October 2026
@m_sovetnik · 58,571
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
@bachinskaya_oxana · 69,991
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
@diana_udovichenko · 27,303
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@TinderSOS · 32,897
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
@lovergolubev · 109,553
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@mortalbeauty · 46,394
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@KrasnovaNatasha_official · 73,436
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
@pokornosttt · 40,126
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@o_svidaniyah_tg · 27,767
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
@females · 492,496
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@doc_Filatov · 27,846
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@ElizavetaUstyugova · 26,330
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Быть одной — ЗБС” (@homealoneee), 27,510 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/homealoneee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.