Channel
@olgashafieva
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,695subscribers
+94 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001753162047 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @olgashafieva |
| Created | 26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/olgashafieva |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 7,695 | +16 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 7,679 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 7,678 | +8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 7,670 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 7,664 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 7,655 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 7,653 | +16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 7,637 | +16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 7,621 | +13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 7,608 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 7,606 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 7,613 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 7,608 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 7,600 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 7,601 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 41 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,321 reactions across 39 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 572 | 43.3% | |
| 🔥 | 193 | 14.6% | |
| 😁 | 132 | 9.99% | |
| 💯 | 129 | 9.77% | |
| 👍 | 69 | 5.22% | |
| 🙏 | 43 | 3.26% | |
| 😱 | 40 | 3.03% | |
| 🥴 | 37 | 2.80% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 2.35% | |
| 👀 | 25 | 1.89% | |
| 🤪 | 14 | 1.06% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 0.681% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 0.606% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 0.53% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.303% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.227% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 0.227% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.076% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,355 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кому золотой унитаз за 1 миллиард рублей?🥚 А никому. А купили уже. Не прикол — реальный (и достойный!) арт-объект от Маурицио Каттелана, который продали на аукционе за $12 млн. Сделан из 18-каратного золота. Название крутое — «America». Дерзко. 100% символ нашего безумного времени.
💯21👍3
На Петроградке случилось чудо… #в_продаже Нет, сюда не перенесли концерт Канье Уэста. С 1894 года здесь стоит переплётная фабрика товарищества «Отто Кирхнер». Она пережила революцию, блокаду и весь XX век. В годы блокады рабочие жили и продолжали трудиться в цехах. Сегодня (и это чудо!) фабрику не снесли, не закатали в панели…. А бережно реставрируют. В 2029 году она превратится в камерный ЖК на 119 резиденций❤️ …
❤25🔥4
В Японии бесплатно отдают особняк в традиционном стиле: 4 спальни, 274 м². В придачу — участок 20 тысяч м² с хранилищем XIX века, лесом и каштановым садом. Но есть нюанс🤡
👀20😁8👍5🙈3
Новостройки подешевели на 0,4%! — сообщают СМИ. Только это издёвка. Ну ладно, не издёвка — кликбейтная хитрость. Есть нюанс: это «в реальном выражении». Поясняю. С января по июль цены на первичку выросли на 4,3% (данные ДОМ.PФ). В то время как инфляция составила 4,7%. Разница — те самые 0,4%. Короче, не подешевели новойстройки, а подорожали на 4,3%. #что_будет_с_ценами_Оль? Пока что — увы, расти.
🙏14😢3
Ещё 5 дней лета🌳 #уютная_пауза
❤18😢4
Вчера все из сферы недвижимости постили карту с «вымирающими точками» на карте Москвы. Хватались за сердце: «За 10 млн рублей теперь можно купить только студию!🤯» А я предлагаю выдохнуть. В 2016 году в Икее табурет стоил 129 р. Сегодня подобный — в районе 2000. Это не значит, что мир рухнул и мебель стала «недоступной». Это значит, что прошло 8 лет и деньги — как обычно — подешевели. Рубль 2018 года и рубль 2026-го…
💯26❤1
Новая азбука эмодзи от зумеров подъехала. Я еле от «😂» отвыкла. За 2 года усвоила: это по-старчески. Спасибо, что «🤩» не забанили. Но убрать из обихода сердце и заменить губами — это, я считаю, кощунство. И… 🙂 — пассивная агрессия, серьёзно?
😁17🤪14💅8
Про мой возраст Вчера зашла с 17-летним сыном купить шампанское, чтобы отметить его поступление. Продавец: «Девушка, паспорт!» Ну это ещё ладно. Когда ездила изучать ВШЭ, комиссия требовала с меня документы для поступления. Я краснела: «Я не абитуриент, я мама». А сегодня в Альфа-банке меня отругал кассир: «Вы почему зашли в кассу без талона?!😡» Я: — В смысле без талона? Вы же сами меня вызвали. Он, грозно: — У …
🔥49👍6👏4😁1
Просто очень эстетично🩵
❤51
Какие пряничные домики в Черняховске!💛 Калининградская область.
❤34
Квартира для дальтоника в Берлине🥭 Когда муж различает только яркие цвета, а жена-иллюстратор их обожает — бежевый интерьер не вариант. ТЗ дизайнеру Касе Кронбергер стояло жёстким: «Никакого белого и пастели! Только сочные, чистые цвета». Отправной точкой стали две плитки: горчичная для кухни и бутылочно-зелёная для ванной. Дизайнер распределила три главных героя — жёлтый, зелёный и красный — по комнатам. Что выш…
❤35🤩5
Причина №731 любить вторичку: добрые бабули👵🏻❤️
❤50😁21
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @olgashafieva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@olgashafieva edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Брокер ё харт │ Ольга Шафиева” (@olgashafieva), 7,695 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olgashafieva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.