Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Коллеги, добрый день

Channel

Коллеги, добрый день

@positive_colleague

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,022subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001628228106
TypeChannel
Username@positive_colleague
DescriptionМы работаем в маркетинге больших корпораций. А в свободное время разбираем кейсы индустрии и развиваем вашу насмотренность. Канал зарегестрирован в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68419e149197d839dcaf0518 Пишите, а я всегда отвечу: @demissia
Created2 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/positive_colleague

Growth

19,02119,10919,0656 August 2026 — 19,109 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,068 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,057 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,048 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,037 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,026 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,021 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,024 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,030 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,031 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,022 subscribers19,0226 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,008–19,122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:1719,022-9
16 Aug 2026, 02:2419,031+1
14 Aug 2026, 13:0719,030+6
13 Aug 2026, 03:3319,024+3
12 Aug 2026, 04:1619,021-5
11 Aug 2026, 01:1119,026-11
9 Aug 2026, 22:1219,037-11
8 Aug 2026, 21:4519,048-9
7 Aug 2026, 21:4119,057-11
6 Aug 2026, 23:0719,068-41
6 Aug 2026, 06:0519,109first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.98%
avg views ÷ 19,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held32 (3 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total60,766
Reactions total2,195
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,630
Videos
2,350
Links
602

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 39s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,065 reactions across 31 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
60329.2%
👍38418.6%
🤣32715.8%
💘27413.3%
❤‍🔥23811.5%
💩823.97%
🤪693.34%
🥰341.65%
🔥251.21%
🤡180.872%
💔40.194%
👎30.145%
😭30.145%
😍10.048%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC776 views45 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

USHATAVA x Этери Тутберидзе Такой магнетизм от холодного взгляда легендарного тренера, который идеально мэтчится со строгим кроем вещей из новой коллекции

29👍9💘6💩1

17 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,510 views106 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Нишевое хобби рабочего дня: наблюдать за коллегами, кто потратил всю получку, чтобы сходить на Канье в Стамбуле, а теперь увидели новости, что он выступит в Сейнт Пи… 🗿

🤣80👍12💘9💩2🤪21

17 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈2,060 views37 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Пятерочка х Собчак Что ж, учебник смело пополняется, зачем был нужен такой нелепый коллаб не понятно. Тем не менее, хочется и похвалить SMM команду бренда, сложно не заметить много новых форматов в социальных сетях.

22👍5💘5💩3❤‍🔥1🤣1

14 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,900 views94 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Решила пользуясь возможностью сделать шатаут самой себе, и рассказать вам, что я решилась (именно так) вести инст. Откладывала это несколько лет, а потом ‘бац’ — и вот уже шесть серий моего сериала ‘офис в большом городе’, где я рассказываю о том, как пройти путь от отклика до оффера, если ты, как и я, ищешь работу в маркетинге в 2026 году. Буду рада вам, коллеги 🍒

❤‍🔥48🥰26💘163💩1

14 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈2,170 views79 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Как финально выглядит проект, в который я внесла правки, после важных инпутов Босса, которые ‘драматично’ поменяют игру.

🤣51❤‍🔥17🤪9💩2

14 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈2,170 views46 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Кофемания х Лобановы Ну какой ‘герли’ коллаб запустили коллеги 💅🏻. Выглядит максимально органично, потому что удалось и сохранить и эстетику нулевых (ака Пэрис Хилтон вайб), который так откликается сестрам, и с самоиронией обыграть мемную фразу Кати из шоу. А с 13 по 31 августа во всех ресторанах можно будет попробовать сам напиток ‘Пинки Матча’ и попытать удачу, выиграв поездку в Париж с сестрами.

❤‍🔥18💘13👍8💩43

13 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈2,410 views58 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Лунтик х krivokoso Коллеги запустили проект, от которого буквально ‘ёкает’, предложив всем нам ощутить теплые чувства о дружбе и мире. В совместный дроп вошли: футболки с героями и аксессуарами, а еще много цвета и вещи, которые совершенно не собираются вести себя серьезно. Фан-факт: с подругой мы называем друг-друга пупсенем и вупсенем 🍒🫐

💘33❤‍🔥149👍1💩1

13 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈2,010 views98 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Своим клипом в социальных сетях Игнатий Винтуров продемонстрировал новую инстор-активность бренда USHATAVA. Коллеги установили камеру, которая транслируют контент прямо на витрины. Восторг.

🤣5820👍9💩6❤‍🔥4🤪1

13 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC≈2,080 views107 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги из Кинопоиска добавили обновили дизайн рейтинга фильма, но только у ‘Колобка’. Обожаю.

68👍18💩11❤‍🔥6💘2👎1🤡1

12 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈2,000 views55 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

В музыке, конечно, 7 нот, но…. тут случился откровенный копипаст. Оказалось, что коллеги из Яндекс 360 еще в 2024 придумали макбук для котеек, чтобы ваш питомец не портил мебель во время долгих коллов в Телемосте. Шатаут гениям 🧡🤍

❤‍🔥29🤣186💩1🤪1

12 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈2,180 views68 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Компьютер для кошек от Сбера Наткнулась на рилз коллеги, где она показывает, как в честь Дня кошек ее питомец получил личный подарок от бренда. Внутри: лакомства, когтеточка и котоколлеги. Это очень классный пример, как в период отсутствия инфоповодов напрямую релевантных вашему бренду, можно создать свой.

💘36❤‍🔥17👍94💩2

12 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC≈2,750 views143 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Яндекс Цветы После срыва сделки по покупке Flowwow коллеги решили создать свой самостоятельный сервис по доставке цветов. Новый бренд начинается с коммуникации в ролике выше. Всем цвета и цветов 🌻

👍51💘3723🤡13💩8🤣6❤‍🔥2🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @positive_colleague. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@positive_colleague edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 94,336 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

таскам время, потехе час
@poteha_time · 440,029
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
A-Teams | Карьера
@huggabletalents · 124,195
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
careerspace
@careerspace · 160,511
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
👨🏻‍💻/ Марат Юсупов
@maratyus · 104,914
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
БУДУ
@budujobs · 125,647
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 155,279
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Коллеги, добрый день” (@positive_colleague), 19,022 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/positive_colleague.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.