Пропаганда красивой жизни от Эли Булочки — когда в виш-листе мраморные раковины, а свидания – с косметологом
По вопросам рекламы: @yunus_kad
Канал включен в перечень РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6735b7f997de7d1d19513222
Created
30 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -198. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,960–50,218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 09:26
49,990
-37
15 Aug 2026, 16:55
50,027
-53
14 Aug 2026, 07:17
50,080
-17
13 Aug 2026, 02:13
50,097
-34
11 Aug 2026, 22:41
50,131
-4
10 Aug 2026, 23:17
50,135
-10
9 Aug 2026, 23:31
50,145
-27
8 Aug 2026, 21:37
50,172
-8
7 Aug 2026, 19:37
50,180
-8
6 Aug 2026, 19:54
50,188
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:47
50,188
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.31%
avg views ÷ 49,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,650
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
25 (31 July 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
116,370
Reactions total
3,427
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,250
Videos
≈199
Links
≈857
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,427 reactions across 25 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
997
29.1%
❤
937
27.3%
🤣
471
13.7%
👍
460
13.4%
😁
202
5.89%
😱
127
3.71%
💔
113
3.30%
😭
83
2.42%
🤩
24
0.7%
🍾
7
0.204%
😈
5
0.146%
⚡
1
0.029%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,427reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И самая главная покупка для вкусного чая: кран, из которого бежит очищенный кипяток. Приехал наконец-то!
Два года назад я узнала, что такое чудо существует и грезила об этом гаджете. Пришлось заказывать в Лондон и оттуда своими силами вести в Россию, потому что у нас про такие технологии и слыхом не слыхивали…
Принимаю поздравления!
Вы не смогли пройти мимо этих свинок? Вот и я тоже!
Месяц назад утащила сразу несколько чашек с разными животными из дымов.керамика. Помимо принтов запала на удобную форму, легкий фарфор и конечно же возможность мыть в посудомойке. Потому что наши ручки созданы только для приятного…
Кого бы забрали себе?
Сегодня мне подарили самый лучший подарок в жизни. Я о таком даже и не мечтала!
Родственники по папиной линии составили фамильное древо. Вплоть до 15 века. Я в диком восторге! Хочу копать дальше, оцифровать и добавить фото куда только возможно. Фото, на которых у всех мои татарские щеки…
Считаю себя абсолютным гением, потому что не просто выбрала красивый диван, а придумала интегрировать в него розетки — да, внутри будет потайной стол со всеми разъемами и местом для техники. Потому что красота хорошо, а мозги лучше…
Какие еще штуки будут у меня в квартире смотрите тут: в списке 100 пунктов для тотального комфорта, о которых многие даже и не догадывались…
Ой не могу, вы такие хитрюшки: предлагаете купить сразу два дивана и менять по настроению.
А ниче тот факт, что ремонтная смета уже не похожа на реальное число? Просто как-будто кто-то жопой сел на калькулятор и слезать не собирается…
Поздравляю, вы проснулись с аддикцией на этот волшебный оттенок зеленого. И теперь вам срочно нужно перекрасить машину, купить новые туфли, новую сумку или хотя бы авокадо…
А когда мне дадут премию хозяюшки года? Вместе с вещами с хайкинга постирала и посушила фундук — тот самый, сорванный с дерева и бережно убранный в карман…
Спросите у меня точную локацию этих мест и я вам не отвечу. Потому что добраться туда самостоятельно, а потом найти все тропинки просто нереально. Этому нужно посвятить жизнь.
Что и сделала Катя — она уже больше 10 лет проводит туры по Турции с самыми необычными маршрутами. Ночевки в облаках, хайкинг по лесам, озера с буйволами, пещеры, высокогорные плато и водопады.
Увидеть все это самостоятельно просто нереально …
🔥25❤24👍11
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @elya_bulochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 541,666 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Роскошь бутиков @zhidkovskiy_beauty · 151,286 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
PILETSKAYA @piletskayabeauty · 98,590 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
RedAutumn @olyaredautumn · 108,422 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
КАРИНА НИГАЙ @nigaykarina · 93,637 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
Раздетый стилист Лена Червова @elennne_style · 102,248 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
Русская мода @russianmoda · 198,346 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Психолог Прокопова Ольга @olga_prokopova_s · 127,859 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
FOR ME @forme · 113,598 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
Лёгкий быт с Аидой Prodom @aidaprodom · 307,742 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В женской шкуре” (@elya_bulochka), 49,990 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elya_bulochka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.