Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алло, Галочка, ты не поверишь!

Channel

Алло, Галочка, ты не поверишь!

@hello_galochka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,501subscribers

+133 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001103035175
TypeChannel
Username@hello_galochka
DescriptionВаши медиапанки в главе с Машей Троицкой: ироничный взгляд на поп-культурку и взрослую жизнь. Рег. в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67c0362809e61d6ce1a4a006 Реклама: @zefirkaeva Связь: @Galochka_blablabot
Created6 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hello_galochka

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

33,96734,55134,2595 August 2026 — 34,368 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,368 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,392 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,420 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,389 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,348 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,334 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,298 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,262 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,252 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,232 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,204 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,259 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,207 subscribers19 August 2026 — 34,090 subscribers20 August 2026 — 34,071 subscribers22 August 2026 — 34,222 subscribers23 August 2026 — 33,967 subscribers25 August 2026 — 34,222 subscribers26 August 2026 — 34,184 subscribers27 August 2026 — 34,192 subscribers28 August 2026 — 34,156 subscribers29 August 2026 — 34,134 subscribers30 August 2026 — 34,298 subscribers31 August 2026 — 34,254 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34,528 subscribers2 September 2026 — 34,504 subscribers3 September 2026 — 34,525 subscribers4 September 2026 — 34,402 subscribers7 September 2026 — 34,551 subscribers10 September 2026 — 34,498 subscribers12 September 2026 — 34,456 subscribers14 September 2026 — 34,512 subscribers16 September 2026 — 34,525 subscribers18 September 2026 — 34,501 subscribers34,5015 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,879–34,639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:1934,501-24
16 Sept 2026, 01:2134,525+13
14 Sept 2026, 08:1834,512+56
12 Sept 2026, 16:2034,456-42
10 Sept 2026, 16:3934,498-53
7 Sept 2026, 13:1734,551+149
4 Sept 2026, 17:3834,402-123
3 Sept 2026, 06:1734,525+21
2 Sept 2026, 03:2834,504-24
1 Sept 2026, 03:0734,528+274
31 Aug 2026, 04:0834,254-44
30 Aug 2026, 00:5334,298+164
29 Aug 2026, 02:4834,134-22
28 Aug 2026, 02:0734,156-36
27 Aug 2026, 03:5434,192+8
26 Aug 2026, 03:2334,184-38
25 Aug 2026, 03:2834,222+255
23 Aug 2026, 19:5833,967-255
22 Aug 2026, 02:2534,222+151
20 Aug 2026, 16:4834,071first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 34,501 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,410
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held102 (4 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total303,710
Reactions total6,048
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 18:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,400
Videos
≈2,260
Links
≈3,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26m 47s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

15,489 reactions across 98 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁5,01832.4%
❤4,34028.0%
🔥3,21820.8%
custom 52607315720043346631,1087.15%
💯9265.98%
👀4713.04%
💔1551.00%
😍1390.897%
🤷‍♂1140.736%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,056 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 102 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hello_galochka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 102 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.98%
1 of 102 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,350
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
7,400
over 101 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjd36Xo1129 August 202629 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 13:44 UTC≈2,240 views40 reactionsread 29 September 2026

Отдельно приятно, что мужчина, по мнению дорогих коллег, по-прежнему пьёт чай у телевизора. Шарман!

😁18custom 526073157200433466313👀6💯3

29 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC≈5,230 views88 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Давненько мы с вами не рассматривали красивых мужиков™. Исправляемся немедля — подрезали новую съёмку Василия Копейкина у На своих ролях. И настроеньице как-то сразу улучшилось даже, ну!

❤41🔥30👀15😁2

29 Sept 2026, 04:16 UTC≈1,830 views90 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

А всё почему? У таракана усики, у мальчугана трусики! Ещё классики пели, так что всё по ГОСТу.

😁60custom 526073157200433466320💯8❤2

28 Sept 2026, 11:19 UTC≈3,880 views102 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Если вы думаете, что это за симпатичный мальчонка и где забыл свою майку, галчата имеют ответ: сие SOMBR голосит на трибьюте Джорджу Майклу. Пока мы с вами спали, MTV VMA устроили масштабное действо с RAYE, Адамом Ламбертом и прочими приличными людьми. Поводов сразу несколько: в ноябре выходит концертный альбом George Michael: The Faith Tour, в декабре — одноимённый фильм, а 25 декабря исполнится десять лет со дня …

🔥73❤16😁9custom 52607315720043346634

28 Sept 2026, 04:12 UTC≈5,230 views170 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Румяные и упругие, бежим на работу. Всегда ваши, галчата.

🔥107❤44😁15💯3custom 52607315720043346631

26 Sept 2026, 21:00 UTC≈7,730 views118 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

Спасибо взбесившимся алгоритмам — соцсети подкинули ≈ 3247,5 обзоров на blazar, в которых усатые и прочие очень разные с виду блогеры удивительно одинаковыми словами объясняют пастве, как нынче противно на этой нашей с вами ярмарке молодого искусства. Поняли-приняли, осознали. Извините, пжалста, что не выложили ни одного поста с пометкой «фу». Всем назло выступим в другом жанре, ибо узрели на стенде Volokno Design…

🔥77😁18❤17custom 52607315720043346636

26 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈9,250 views207 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

Месье Кот принимает удар судьбы.

😁119😍51❤18custom 526073157200433466318🤷‍♂1

26 Sept 2026, 12:59 UTC≈9,220 views148 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Дурацкая мечта № 3739494. Купить эту сумку moschino и носить в ней месье Кота. Хочет он этого или нет.

😁96💯26custom 526073157200433466312❤9🔥5

25 Sept 2026, 13:30 UTC≈8,390 views213 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Рубрика «Мам, я тоже хочу!» У Икеи впереди мягкое пополнение — коллекция Alptall, посвящённая животным Гималаев. В ней и красная панда, и снежный барс, и як, и длинноухий тушканчик, и кого только нет. А главное — манул с лицом Галочки в будни поутру. Коллекция, само собой, считается детской, но после акулы Blåhaj, за которую ценители и девичью честь не прочь отдать, мы все всё понимаем. Продажи назначены на 1 октя…

😁126❤52🔥30custom 52607315720043346635

24 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTC≈8,440 views230 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Нам пишут, Минфин предложил облагать ваши пассивные доходы по ставкам НДФЛ до 22%. Вы там что, опять слишком хорошо живёте? Стоило на минутку отвернуться!

😁150❤28💯25custom 526073157200433466322👀5

24 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈10,400 views201 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Рубрика «Мам, я тоже хочу!» Пока некоторые пытаются спасти кино, у A24 важное культурное заявление — «Энциклопедия котов». Но не всяких, а артистов. На 420 страницах труда людишки наконец занимают положенное им место — сидят рядом с властителями мира и не отсвечивают. А всего собрано больше тысячи зверьков со всего мирового экрана — от Кота в сапогах и мистера Бигглсворта до безымянных дворян, которые едва мелькнули…

❤116🔥67😍13😁3custom 52607315720043346632

23 Sept 2026, 08:01 UTC≈7,400 views201 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Ребзя, срочные новости, все сюда. Они там внедрили нам в мозги агентуру России. Вы не знали? Теперь вы знаете.

😁101custom 526073157200433466348👀36🤷‍♂9💯5🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @hello_galochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@hello_galochka edited 18 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,646
#1
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 100,724
#2
Светский интроверт
@svintrovert · 84,226
#3
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,565,293
#4
Телеканал Страз
@CTPA3bI · 16,334
#5
🐍МОСКВИЧКА🐍
@glavmoskvichka · 34,917
#6
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,691
#7
Каждой твари - кампари
@tvrkmpr · 22,746
#8
Рады, но не от всего сердца
@neotvsego · 9,664
#9
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 740,982
#10
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,952
#11
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402
#12
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,178,521
#13
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 855,067
#14
Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 124,698
#15
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,122,482
#16
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,622,630
#17
Не последние люди в городе
@neposlednielyudi · 57,590
#18
Mash
@mash · 3,110,586
#19
Зинаида Пронченко
@ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,310
#20
Дудь
@yurydud · 862,341
#21
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,409
#22
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 381,978
#23
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 354,527
#24
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,936
#25
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,506
#26
Суббота Субботиной
@SubbotinaDasha · 20,844
#27
Скажи Гордеевой
@skazhigordeevoy · 112,412
#28
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 372,470
#29
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,060,678
#30
iGutsal
@igutsal · 12,000
#31
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,393
#32
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,343
#33
На работе не ценят
@nobodyrespectsme · 2,410
#34
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,668,820
#35
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 504,326
#36
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 671,042
#37
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 176,821
#38
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 318,588
#39
Беседы о русской халтуре
@Dialogiorusskoihalture · 9,233
#40
Лентач
@lentachold · 392,458
#41
Беглец
@clubhouse_rus · 4,544
#42
БП онлайн
@bponline · 111,120
#43
Сталингулаг
@stalin_gulag · 300,733
#44
БОЖЕНА
@bozhenabozhenabozhena · 65,656
#45
СЕРГЕЙ НАУМОВ
@naumita · 59,917
#46
СИНЬКА
@thynk · 70,521
#47
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390
#48
PEOPLETALK
@Peopletalkru · 183,617
#49
Осторожно, Москва
@ostorozhno_moskva · 391,203
#50
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 123,525
#51
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 905,528
#52
Жидковские посиделки
@zhidkovskiy_talk · 575,918
#53
ПОЗАВЧЕРАШНИЕ НОВОСТИ/МАША МИНОГАРОВА😎
@MinogarovaNews · 95,041
#54
Скромное Обаяние Пацана
@kukan_sportif · 38,117
#55
Рыба Лоцман
@ryba_lotsman · 52,481
#56
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,261
#57
Сююмбике daily
@davletkill · 2,483
#58
Мужчина, вы куда?
@crisisman · 44,962
#59
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 134,107
#60
Дождь | Новости
@tvrain · 460,824
#61
Бахчисарайские гвоздики
@darkmgimo · 106,688
#62
Илья Яшин
@yashin_russia · 136,589
#63
aavst2022
@aavst2022 · 176,254
#64
Город Глуповъ
@gorodglupov · 155,883
#65
Беляков
@bellochkin · 28,999
#66
Фёдор, Бонд и Чук
@FBChu · 44,983
#67
Вестник Мракобеса
@nikabelonika · 66,859
#68
superficial space cadet
@superficialspacecadet · 24,767
#69
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 122,992
#70
VOICE
@darkvoicemag · 44,826
#71
Кинокостюм для чайников
@kinocostume · 39,210
#72
Гуд морнинг, Карл!
@goodmorningkarl · 56,164
#73
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 157,220
#74
The Blueprint
@theblueprintru · 96,067
#75
Долецкая-Doletskaya
@alionadol · 76,115
#76
Новая газета
@novaya_pishet · 210,902
#77
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,271
#78
Медиавойны
@mediavoyni · 38,944
#79
Москва сейчас
@mosnow · 448,438
#80
Афиша Daily
@afishadaily · 70,991
#81
MUR
@fashion_mur · 208,487
#82
Модные хроники Злой Киски
@zlayakiska · 73,552
#83
BBC News | Русская служба
@bbcrussian · 387,211
#84
The Blueprint News
@theblueprintnews · 72,402
#85
Дьявол носит H&M
@devilwearshandm · 72,543
#86
Печенюшки&Co
@pechenuwki · 34,505
#87
Правила жизни
@pravilamagru · 63,713
#88
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 804,634
#89
ШМОТ
@zashmot · 107,318
#90
Луис Иванович
@LIVfashionmag · 202,818
#91
don't touch my face
@donttouchmyface · 55,148
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

НЕПРОЗАМУЖ
@mortalbeauty · 46,391
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Мужчина, вы куда?
@crisisman · 44,962
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
Скажи Гордеевой
@skazhigordeevoy · 112,412
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
ХАЙЛАЙТЕР
@goshakartsevcalling · 39,877
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
Говорящая Тыква
@talking_pumpkin · 32,281
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
Рживопись
@rzhivopis1 · 37,020
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Беляков
@bellochkin · 28,999
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алло, Галочка, ты не поверишь!” (@hello_galochka), 34,501 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hello_galochka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.