Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Алло, Галочка, ты не поверишь!

@hello_galochka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

34,232subscribers

-136 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001103035175
TypeChannel
Username@hello_galochka
DescriptionВаши медиапанки в главе с Машей Троицкой: ироничный взгляд на поп-культурку и взрослую жизнь. Рег. в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67c0362809e61d6ce1a4a006 Реклама: @zefirkaeva Связь: @Galochka_blablabot
Created6 April 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hello_galochka

Growth

34,23234,42034,3265 August 2026 — 34,368 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,368 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,392 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,420 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,389 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,348 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,334 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,298 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,262 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,252 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,232 subscribers5 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,204–34,448 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:0534,232-20
13 Aug 2026, 10:1434,252-10
12 Aug 2026, 13:2334,262-36
11 Aug 2026, 10:4334,298-36
10 Aug 2026, 08:2534,334-14
9 Aug 2026, 10:3334,348-41
8 Aug 2026, 08:1834,389-31
7 Aug 2026, 11:3634,420+28
6 Aug 2026, 15:0134,392+24
6 Aug 2026, 01:5034,368no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:0634,368first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 34,232 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,300
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held31 (4 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total226,160
Reactions total5,400
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12,300
Videos
2,220
Links
3,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 56s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,833 reactions across 27 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,90139.3%
1,06922.1%
🔥78816.3%
custom 526073157200433466356511.7%
💯2805.79%
👀931.92%
💔861.78%
🤷‍♂470.972%
😍40.083%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,400reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 31 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hello_galochka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈2,490 views177 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

В рамках новой рубрики «Мир должен знать» очень жалеем, что не попали на ювелирную выставку в Амстердаме, где Катя Рабей показывала свои работы. Кстати, как переводится их названия мы в душе не представляем, так что никакой пропаганды ЛГБТК+ здесь нет. И незачем так орать.

🔥124custom 52607315720043346632616😁8👀3

14 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC≈5,920 views85 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Поздравляем с днём, когда Галочка узнала, что знаменитые строки из рекламы «Мастер-Дент» — двести семьдесят четыре, десять, ноль один — принадлежат перу Евгения Евтушенко. Как мы нашли эту информейшн и что искали — не спрашивайте. Сие неизвестно даже нам.

😁52custom 52607315720043346631612🔥5

13 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈7,010 views167 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Дело — дрянь, против меня сговорились все рестораны мира в рамках отдельно взятой Москвы. Куда ни приду — везде мне невкусно. Когда приносят счёт, становится ещё невкуснее. Примерно раза в два, потому что цены в столице отечества какие-то неприятные. Иногда кажется, что в меню просто набор случайных цифр. Из-за этого подлого сговора я вынуждена вести социально пассивную жизнь: выхожу из дома строго по делам и передв

82😁63custom 526073157200433466318🔥4

12 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈7,110 views166 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Нам пишут, россияне потратили энную сумму денег на эротические костюмки Человека-Паука. Поразительная непатриотичность, мы считаем. Ребзя, ну вы чо там!

😁121custom 526073157200433466328💯9👀71

12 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC≈8,080 views58 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика «Москва изучена на 1%». А вот предлагают распил с доставочкой. Надо кому?

custom 526073157200433466331😁18🔥9

12 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈8,420 views59 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Утро, гайз! «АААААА!» — представьте, как трубит слон. Представили? Я ору громче, потому что богоподобные Fugees, перессорившиеся ещё в середине нулевых, решили воссоединиться. Казалось, счастье невозможно. «Скорее Джордж Буш и Усама Бен-Ладен решат выпить латте в Старбаксе, чем случится реюнион Fugees», — говорил Прас Мичел после скандала. В начале двадцатых, правда, Лорен Хилл, Вайклиф Жан и Мичел пытались провести

🔥3014😁9👀3💯1🤷‍♂1custom 52607315720043346631

11 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈9,070 views233 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Долго думали, какую весть огласить в честь обеда: что в Москве разбирают цветочный Рижский (плак-плак) или что Шаману намедни отказалась подпевать паства. Решили жахнуть обе! Вот такие мы люди — щедрые.

custom 526073157200433466394🔥60😁5523💔1

11 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈10,200 views195 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Рубрика «Москва изучена на 1%». Всадники Апокалипсиса грядут.

😁138💯26👀17custom 5260731572004334663122

11 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈10,400 views352 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Пришла беда, откуда не ждали: дочь полка полюбила ромашковый чай. В 16 почти лет — в разгар пубертата, когда подросткам природой велено отращивать шелковистые усы и вести себя разнузданно. Что дальше? Цикорий вместо кофе? Телеканал «Спас»? Её папенька в эти годы уже успел отравиться спиртом «Рояль», а подружка главной Галочки товарищ Вишневский — вылететь из мажористой школы имени Белинского за плохое поведение. М

😁25171custom 526073157200433466326🔥4

11 Aug 2026, 04:12 UTC≈6,480 views351 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Esquire USA версус Esquire KZ. Как же в Казахстане чувствуют — просто жиза. Вы за какого Брэда? USA — 🔥 Казахстан — ❤️

297🔥39😁9😍4custom 52607315720043346632

10 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈7,630 views145 reactionsread 15 August 2026

В честь Дня лени наше «Бюро ненужных знаний» рвётся рассказать, что известно о слове «лодырь», происхождение которого слегка туманно. Пока словарь Даля ищет корни в немецких luder — «распущенность, легкомыслие» — или liederlich — «безалаберный, распущенный», излагаем версию простую, народную. В начале XIX века врач с простым и звучным именем Христиан Иванович Лодер открыл в Москве лечебное заведение с минеральными

76😁42🔥20custom 52607315720043346637

10 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈9,110 views173 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

СМИ: «ЦИК выявил у Яблока признаки иностранного финансирования»

😁114💔25custom 526073157200433466315🔥11👀53

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @hello_galochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@hello_galochka edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 243,490 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алло, Галочка, ты не поверишь!” (@hello_galochka), 34,232 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hello_galochka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.