На страже светской жизни. @kroshkin4
Официальный канал шоу «Светские крошки». Ведет редактор Злата Кузьмина
В реестре РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673757539d804a279bb3ff38®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
5 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net +1,837. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,971–83,732 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 19:15
79,040
-810
19 Sept 2026, 03:39
79,850
-348
16 Sept 2026, 17:17
80,198
-455
14 Sept 2026, 21:19
80,653
-956
13 Sept 2026, 08:02
81,609
-1,227
11 Sept 2026, 11:16
82,836
+4,404
8 Sept 2026, 17:17
78,432
+1,442
5 Sept 2026, 11:20
76,990
+7
3 Sept 2026, 17:01
76,983
-23
2 Sept 2026, 10:35
77,006
-5
1 Sept 2026, 08:52
77,011
+145
31 Aug 2026, 07:38
76,866
-41
30 Aug 2026, 05:04
76,907
-35
29 Aug 2026, 02:46
76,942
-34
28 Aug 2026, 05:23
76,976
-20
27 Aug 2026, 02:03
76,996
-49
25 Aug 2026, 23:23
77,045
-34
24 Aug 2026, 19:47
77,079
-75
23 Aug 2026, 05:24
77,154
-51
21 Aug 2026, 14:15
77,205
first reading
Engagement
247 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 79,040 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,100
156 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
157
of 247 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
247 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
2,196,131
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,700
Videos
≈2,290
Links
≈636
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 19s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
0.405%
1 of 247 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
15,200
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
14,500
over 245 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqufv46o
1
26 August 2026
26 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 247 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Как верный зритель «Светских крошек», я в первых рядах (перед экраном айпада) смотрел выпуск нового сезона!
Во-первых, поздравляю ведущих! Во-вторых, это хайли рекоменд для всех любителей светской повестки. В третьих, сильно благодарю Мадонну, Женю и Лёшу за такое приятное упоминание в выпуске. Про скромность – услышал) Но бороться пока не собираюсь. Тише едешь – дальше будешь, возраст уже позволяет говорить присказ…
Мы в эту субботу рассматриваем первые кадры со свадьбы Марии Иваковой и Кирилла Гурбанова. Бизнесмен сделал предложение Марии в конце апреля, а сегодня пара поженилась в Тбилиси. На роспись пришли близкие и друзья молодоженов.
Тем временем, тяга к востоку не покидает наших светских героев. На днях до Японии добралась дизайнер Вика Газинская. Она, например, отправилась изучать древнюю столицу страны - Киото.
У Насти Мироновой и её возлюбленного Дмитрия Масюка, оказывается, больше общего, чем мы думали: топ-менеджер и на фортепиано играть умеет, как и сама Настя.
Дана Манасир с возлюбленным Давидом Шамисом уже вовсю вместе посещают светские ивенты. Пара объявила об отношениях в мае этого года, а вчера пару заметили на премии Плавно.
Виктория Шелягова напоминает нам, что осень уже в самом разгаре. Золотую пору дива застала на пикнике в Холуе. Образ, конечно же, выбран максимально подходящий под сезон и пейзажи вокруг.
Светские крошки LIVE pinned «СВЕТСКИЕ КРОШКИ ВЕРНУЛИСЬ! Мы впервые выходим в YouTube и с новым ведущим — Алексеем Жидковским! Мадонна, Евгения и Алексей разбираются в главных светских событиях и новостях сезона. В этом выпуске: свадьбы (Ида Галич, Олеся Иванченко, Клава Кока и Дмитрий…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 247 posts we hold for @svetskiekroshki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Виктория Шелягова @victoriashelyagova · 25,938 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
МиссТелеграм | @Ms_krasota · 63,539 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Tatoshe4ka•Life•Style @Lady_etiquette · 120,998 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
РадиоПатрики RadioPatriki @radiopatriki · 23,976 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 17 September 2026
Бахчисарайские гвоздики @darkmgimo · 106,682 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Героиня Татлера @tatlersheroine · 100,724 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
Георгиева Снежанна @marvelous2309 · 38,269 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Миллиарды @overbillions · 31,402 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 6 September 2026
Журнал «Москвичка» @moskvichka_mag · 102,398 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
ХАЙЛАЙТЕР @goshakartsevcalling · 40,066 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
Oganova555 @Oganova555 · 23,099 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 September 2026
ШМОТ @zashmot · 107,318 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
VOGUE-religion @religion_vogue · 25,744 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
Jewellery Digest @jeweldigest · 21,531 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Виктория Демидова @demivikademivika · 34,479 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026
Скромное Обаяние Пацана @kukan_sportif · 38,225 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Модные хроники Злой Киски @zlayakiska · 73,552 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
PEOPLETALK @Peopletalkru · 183,617 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Вика, расскажи-ка! @vika_manasir · 21,463 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 September 2026
MORGUN @MorgunMaria · 45,731 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
«Москвичка». Красота @moskvichkabeauty · 53,106 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Мамкина модница @mamkina · 30,134 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
МАЛАХОВ @and_malakhov · 39,743 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Sveta Bondarchuk @lovepeacesvet · 54,356 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 63 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Mona (singer)(en.wikipedia.org) “…[[Eldar Dzharakhov]].{{Cite web |title=Светские крошки LIVE |url=https://t.me/svetskiekroshki/42001 |access-date=2026-03-14 |website=Telegram}}{{Cite…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Светские крошки LIVE” (@svetskiekroshki), 79,040 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svetskiekroshki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
