Ну в эту субботу - очередная серия «Мастера Игры»! Готовьтесь к новому взрыву мозга 😈
❤56🔥14❤🔥2👎2💘1

Channel
@alenablin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
49,023subscribers
+108 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001756228610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alenablin |
| Description | Ведущая шоу «Алёна, блин!»Сотрудничество [email protected] https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67320fcfe9b24e448c54deb6®istryType=bloggersPermission |
| Created | 16 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alenablin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 49,023 | -32 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 49,055 | -13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 49,068 | +206 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 48,862 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 48,853 | -19 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 48,872 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 48,884 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 48,900 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 48,915 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (25 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 92,950 |
| Reactions total | 1,972 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,972 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,170 | 59.3% | |
| 🔥 | 379 | 19.2% | |
| 👍 | 196 | 9.94% | |
| 😁 | 45 | 2.28% | |
| ❤🔥 | 44 | 2.23% | |
| 💯 | 26 | 1.32% | |
| 🤡 | 24 | 1.22% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 1.12% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 0.659% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 0.558% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.355% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 0.304% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 0.304% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 0.254% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.254% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.203% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 0.152% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 0.152% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.051% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.051% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.051% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,972reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну в эту субботу - очередная серия «Мастера Игры»! Готовьтесь к новому взрыву мозга 😈
❤56🔥14❤🔥2👎2💘1
Не ждали?! 😂
❤20💩2🤡1🤮1
ДОСКА ПОЧЕТА! Итоги 9 серии реалити-шоу «Мастер игры» Лидером недели снова становится Алёна Блин, набрав 31% голосов. Согласны с результатами? 🤩 Если виснет, мы в MAX
❤93👍24❤🔥7👎3🔥2💘1💩1
Торнике женится! Все рассказал у меня в шоу «Алёна, блин!», интервью здесь 👉🏼 https://youtu.be/7jV7zilGfUk?si=8A0WiCcRRkH5vsqY
❤50👍7💩3🤮2🤡1🤣1
Айза, ты серьезно?) Антигерой который регулярно собирает «Доски почета» у зрителей и который уже какое шоу не колотит никаких коалиций, ни голосов против кого-то, играет сам за себя, а не вылетает, как разменная монета в чужих интересах?) И не предает, не подставляет тех, кто ее поддерживает?) Это называется «словить звезду», видимо. Интересные понятия об антигероях 😂 Может, обсудим твой статус и роли в реалити? А?😉
❤233🔥88😁31💯23❤🔥7👍4👎3🥰3
Как вам вчерашняя серия «Мастера Игры»?! Нам с Владом - очень 🔥😂 Светлые 🫶🏻🤡 Как вам новые Темные?👿
🔥220❤65⚡13❤🔥5👎3💯3😁3👌1
Если бы в моём детстве были такие возможности, может, и не узнали бы вы такую журналистку, как Алёна Блин. А смотрели бы, как фигуристка Алёна Жигалова крутит тройные тулупы где‑нибудь на Чемпионате мира. Шучу) Я вот к чему. Мои друзья - Евгений Плющенко и Яна Рудковская на днях подарили 65 детям из многодетных семей и ребят из Курской, Белгородской и других приграничных территорий шанс прикоснуться к большому спорт…
❤57🤡22👏11
«Ни да/ни нет» Х Алёна Блин В новом выпуске «Мастер игры» Алёна Блин была инициирована в темного игрока✨ Она поучаствовала в нашей рубрике и безукоризненно с ней справилась 👍🏻 Шоу «Мастер игры» по субботам в 18:30 на ТНТ 😍 📲 Подписаться на ROCKET MAG в МАХ
❤35👍16🔥1😁1
Мастер, ну вот я и осталась одна в царстве Тьмы… Вызываю того, кому в этой темноте со мной точно не будет страшно🧛🏻♂️ Влад, не подведи! 😈 А вы пишите, как вам новая серия «Мастера Игры»?!
❤105👍37👎6🥰4😍4💋3
😂 Сегодня в 18:30 в эфир ТНТ выйдет премьерная серия второго сезона психологического реалити «Мастер игры». И, похоже, новым лидером темных становится интервьюер «Алена, блин!». «Мне кажется, если бы я пришла в первой серии в качестве светлого, игра бы очень быстро закончилась для меня, потому что темные меня бы точно грохнули, ха-ха. Но мне было интересно стать темной. Ведь если я сильный светлый игрок и знаю уже …
❤46👍14🔥4👎1😁1
Не пропустите завтра в 18.30 на ТНТ🔥
❤58🔥31😁4🎉1
Доброе утро! 🤩
❤25🤝4
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @alenablin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Alyona Zhigalova |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian journalist and video blogger |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алена Жигалова” (@alenablin), 49,023 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alenablin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.