Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 52 days, net -96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,238–19,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 23:17
19,256
-9
17 Sept 2026, 14:16
19,265
-7
15 Sept 2026, 14:40
19,272
-2
14 Sept 2026, 00:20
19,274
-6
12 Sept 2026, 09:17
19,280
-25
10 Sept 2026, 02:19
19,305
-17
6 Sept 2026, 22:39
19,322
+1
4 Sept 2026, 05:38
19,321
-8
2 Sept 2026, 16:28
19,329
+4
1 Sept 2026, 16:59
19,325
+1
31 Aug 2026, 18:37
19,324
-3
30 Aug 2026, 15:24
19,327
-7
29 Aug 2026, 17:55
19,334
-2
28 Aug 2026, 19:24
19,336
-5
27 Aug 2026, 22:16
19,341
-3
26 Aug 2026, 19:34
19,344
-13
23 Aug 2026, 03:37
19,357
-5
21 Aug 2026, 18:36
19,362
-2
20 Aug 2026, 18:02
19,364
+2
19 Aug 2026, 20:54
19,362
first reading
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 19,256 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,550
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
51 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
12,770
Reactions total
381
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17m 10s
Average length
2m 52s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,638 reactions across 47 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
650
24.6%
🔥
563
21.3%
😁
560
21.2%
👍
363
13.8%
💯
338
12.8%
❤🔥
57
2.16%
🦄
24
0.91%
😱
22
0.834%
custom 5784967785436154901
21
0.796%
😢
13
0.493%
👏
12
0.455%
🏆
10
0.379%
⚡
2
0.076%
🍾
2
0.076%
🥰
1
0.038%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,381 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 51 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ventureStuff. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.96%
1 of 51 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,330
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,840
over 50 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJqMnqfGbHwPj9TkuVcaZSfPkCdKPj4TwKrkmoK
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Про разных инвесторов
Пока я снимал новое видео (тоже залетело), играя роли разных инвесторов (смотри видосик) поймал себя на мысли, что они все настолько разные бывают, ебанутость от -100 до 100, что решил еще разные архетипы записать и снять.
А тут новый ролик уже 10К просмотров по стате, а первый уже 75К :)
56,000 просмотров за сутки
Норм формат
Сажусь писать новые кринж сценарии дичи.
Можете свои жизненные ситуации накидать в коментах, если есть чем поделиться :)
У меня на очереди
- зарисовки коллов с паханом
- звонки с enterprise клиентом
- инвестиционные комитеты VC фондов
Новый формат, который залетает или почему лучшее - враг хорошего
Пару месяцев назад я увидел формат в Instagram, который залетает и от которого я угораю - это сатиристические видеозвонки, где один и тот же актёр в разных ролях за каждого участника Zoom-колла, где участники несут всякую хуйню.
Мой друг Саша Ильин недавно начал делать этот формат и поделился со мной результатами, от чего я вдохновился и записал сегод…
Чужое всегда лучше
С парнями плавали в море, и как-то один произнес эту фразу, когда мы обсуждали, что оказывается часто бывает, что мы смотрим на чужое (приложение/проекты/бизнес), а порой сами дорисовываем в голове, как там круто.
Вот допустим есть один известный mobile app project с Кипра, и многим из нас казалось, что там круто, ибо их рекламу я вижу постоянно, даже пару раз скриншотил тесты воронки смотрел.
А…
У сына появилась цель
Чат, срочное включение
Ко мне только что подошел старший сын (12 лет) и сообщил что будет копить на свой первый комп ко дню рождения.
Сказал что с ЧатГПТ произвел ресерч и собрал себе конфигурацию.
Я конечно ему обьяснил, что NVMe SSD подорожали раза в 2 из-за нас с вами, но в душе я сейчас как ДиКаприо из мема.
Гордый и хочу разрыдаться
Спросил как он собирается накопить.
Будет копить ка…
A/B тест 80 уровня
Я только что посмотрел видео Mr. Beast, как он с кентами от полиции уходит и полиция получала по $100K в свой бюджет приз от него за каждого пойманного персонажа (их 5). Конечно же всех пятерых поймали.
Но мне друг только что на колле поведал, что он в зависимости от региона кастомные обложки для YouTube видео сделал, чтобы любой зритель узнал полицейскую машину именно из его региона!
Вот это да…
Нужны инвесторы и корпоративные пилоты в 2026? Всё в одном месте — на SberUnity! ⚡️
SberUnity — единственная площадка, где присутствуют все ключевые игроки рынка: 250+ корпораций, 1600+ инвесторов и 7500+ стартапов. Никакого парсинга — каждый стартап проверяется экспертами Сбера.
Прямо внутри SberUnity: запросы на скаутинг, венчурный маркетплейс, инструмент «Проверка ФНС». И это всё бесплатно — понадобится только н…
Как смотреть свой расход в Клоде
Мануал:
1/ Идешь на caprock.dev
2/ ставишь его командой:
brew install dspv/tap/caprock
3/ включаешь командой:
caprock up
4/ открывается http://127.0.0.1:4173/
5/ листаешь всю стату и изучаешь где ты зря юзаешь дорогие модели
Профит
Не благодарите
Диман, отвечай людям в коментах :)
Токен максинг и два клода
Друзья, надо поговорить об этом. Иногда мне кажется нам антропик раздает разные лимиты на одной и той же подписке клода за 200, но у меня лимит не кончается, а у многих кончается.
Почитав чатик, я пока склоняюсь к одной концепции: слишком зря вы часть лимитов расходуете.
Если вы любите Fable, используйте его ТОЛЬКО для анализа и планирования. Сам код писать Opus 4.8-5 отлично умеет, повер…
❤20👍4🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @ventureStuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Кирилл Фомичев @fomichevkirill · 28,567 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Русский венчур @rusven · 24,781 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
The Edinorog 🦄 @Theedinorogblog · 43,821 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Телеграмма от Максима Юрина @yumaks · 42,740 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов @bossofyourboss · 27,735 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
СберСтартап @sberstartup · 41,488 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 29 August 2026
Mikhail Tokovinin @mtokovinin · 108,209 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Forbes. Идеи для бизнеса @forbes_business · 26,684 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 12 September 2026
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика @temno · 79,668 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
Индекс дятла @dindex · 22,106 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Kumar & Solo @solokumi · 37,553 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Кутергин в огне 🔥 @kutergin_on_fire · 62,116 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Итак, это Панов @itakblet · 25,172 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
e/acc @cryptoEssay · 62,598 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Продакты не нужны @betternotworse · 28,526 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
Гуринович делится! @gurinovich_shares · 29,434 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Максим Спиридонов @mspiridonov · 67,058 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного @aioftheday · 43,919 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
kyrillic @kyrillic · 60,982 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Dumik @dumik · 22,244 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Ваня Замесин @zamesin · 50,297 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Оскар Хартманн @Oskar_Hartmann · 94,059 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Стартап дня. Александр Горный. @startupoftheday · 60,449 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
ХУЦПА <-> Женя Давыдов @hutzp · 45,113 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Венчур по Понятиям” (@ventureStuff), 19,256 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ventureStuff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.