Встречаемся завтра Прочитал ваши вопросы и могу сказать, что эфир получится интересным 🔥 Поговорим и про твердое, и про мягкое в неформальной обстановке Вы еще можете оставить свой вопрос для эфира 👉🏼 ЗДЕСЬ До встречи завтра в 12:00 мск
❤13🔥7❤🔥3

Channel
@mikhaildashkiev
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,937subscribers
+875 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001386324130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mikhaildashkiev |
| Description | Предприниматель. Методолог. Исследователь. Муж и отец. 13 лет помогаю бизнесам и личностям системно расти. Сотрудничество, консультации: @assistant_on_air Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67d25a27be8c0d1c031fea61 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mikhaildashkiev |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 43,937 | +57 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 43,880 | +39 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 43,841 | +18 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 43,823 | +66 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 43,757 | +17 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 43,740 | +61 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 43,679 | +4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 43,675 | -36 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 43,711 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 43,708 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 43,718 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 43,731 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 43,743 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 43,745 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 43,739 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 43,741 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 43,740 | -25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 43,765 | -52 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 43,817 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 43,823 | first reading |
93 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 93 (31 July 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 113,740 |
| Reactions total | 2,293 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 00:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,510 reactions across 89 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,986 | 45.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1,750 | 26.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 569 | 8.74% | |
| 👍 | 546 | 8.39% | |
| 💯 | 135 | 2.07% | |
| 🙏 | 114 | 1.75% | |
| 😁 | 111 | 1.71% | |
| 😍 | 69 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 40 | 0.614% | |
| 🤯 | 37 | 0.568% | |
| ⚡ | 35 | 0.538% | |
| 🎉 | 35 | 0.538% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 0.399% | |
| 🏆 | 21 | 0.323% | |
| 🤣 | 20 | 0.307% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 0.138% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.077% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.031% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,510 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mikhaildashkiev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 93 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Встречаемся завтра Прочитал ваши вопросы и могу сказать, что эфир получится интересным 🔥 Поговорим и про твердое, и про мягкое в неформальной обстановке Вы еще можете оставить свой вопрос для эфира 👉🏼 ЗДЕСЬ До встречи завтра в 12:00 мск
❤13🔥7❤🔥3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤10⚡7🔥6
Хочу попробовать новый формат диалога с вами Давно чувствую желание общаться с вами не только через посты, подкасты, кружочки, а в неформальной обстановке. Мне кажется, именно в таких разговорах рождается больше всего истины и глубины. Поэтому придумал некую рубрику «Посиделки». Это формат эфиров, где мы будем с вами просто разговаривать: о жизни, бизнесе, интересах, насущных темах. Вы задаёте вопросы — я отвеча…
❤36🔥17👍9
Штурвал всегда остается у фаундера ✈️ На днях проводили большую планерку по методологии Фонда с Женей Ларионовым, моим другом и сооснователем Фонда. На встрече мы хотели обстучать об его опыт нашу текущую методологию. Прошлись по поиску узких мест в бизнесе, построению дорожных карт, Run / Change / Disrupt, управляемым брейнштормам, работе с гипотезами, скорингу компаний, финансовому мониторингу и репортингу. Одн…
🔥26❤19👍9
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡3🔥3💯2
Рефлексировал сегодня после всех встреч и созвонов, и понял одну интересную штуку Года полтора назад я был в тупиковом состоянии. Не видел, куда именно иду, что строю и, главное, зачем. Не было уверенности, что я готов посвятить следующие годы своей жизни тому делу, которым занимался. И это тревожило. Тут понял, что уже долгое время я чувствую ровное состояние: твердость, спокойствие и удовольствие от того, что п…
❤78🔥40❤🔥29👍9👏2👀1😁1
Собственники, генеральные директоры и топ-менеджеры, пост для вас Хочу порекомендовать вам к просмотру эфир моих партнеров. 🗓️29 сентября ИнФинанс, проводят бесплатный вебинар «Проверка бизнеса глазами ФНС». Будут разбирать максимально прикладные вещи: НДС, деньги собственника, работу с самозанятыми, договоры, дробление бизнеса и другие моменты, которые могут привлечь внимание ФНС. По итогу вы посмотрите на свой …
❤22❤🔥11🔥6😁1
Вчера случилось историческое событие в нашей семье Мы посетили футбольный матч, играли Португалия - Уэльс ⚽️ Лёвка сейчас серьёзно увлекается футболом и хотел впервые посмотреть его вживую. Ну и что скрывать, мы с Владой тоже давно хотели понять, что люди находят в этой атмосфере. Теперь поняли 😄 Это впечатляющий опыт. Пятьдесят тысяч человек, которые одновременно переживают за одно и то же. Атмосфера единства. …
🔥49❤31🏆16❤🔥6👏2👍1
Стратегический слот в календаре Есть в моем календаре ежедневный слот, о котором знает только мой ассистент. Я его называю стратегическим слотом. Это пространство пустоты, которое нельзя занимать. Моё время, которое я посвящаю: семье, Владе, чтению книг, рефлексии. Последние дни все чаще в этот слот читаю книги или тренируюсь. На мой взгляд, это очень полезная штука. Наступил момент во всем мире, когда нужно пл…
❤45🔥32👍14
Разговоры с семилеткой От Лёвки на этой неделе поступала новая подборка необычных вопросов: — Есть ли реальность реальнее нашей? Например, в Майнкрафте есть более реалистичная версия. Значит где-то существует гиперреалистичная реальность, в которой находится наша реальность? — Какое у меня предназначение и миссия в этом мире? У стола есть функция, чтобы тарелки стояли, у стула, чтобы сидеть. А у меня какая миссия?…
❤64🔥56❤🔥17👍1
Почему я не люблю говорить о себе Недавно слушал книгу Кастанеды. Там есть практика «стирание личной истории». Суть в двух словах: чем больше людей думают, что знают тебя, тем меньше в тебе остаётся свободы. Каждый, кто «прочитал» тебя, составил мнение, приклеил ярлык — забирает кусок твоей энергии. Не в мистическом смысле, а в самом практическом: тебе потом сложнее быть другим, потому что все уже решили, какой т…
❤91🔥43❤🔥18💯3👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
😁16❤15🔥9🤣3❤🔥2👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @mikhaildashkiev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@mikhaildashkiev edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Понимаете ли вы, как это исправить?
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как у вас сейчас с клиентами?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 80 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Михаил Дашкиев” (@mikhaildashkiev), 43,937 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mikhaildashkiev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.