Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

proVenture (проВенчур)

@proventure

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,874subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001115202239
TypeChannel
Username@proventure
DescriptionКанал про венчурные инвестиции, технологии и предпринимательство. Основан на опыте Дениса Ефремова (R136 Ventures, ex-Fort Ross Ventures, ex-Seedstars, ex-McKinsey, Forbes 30u30) По всем вопросам @proventure_admin РКН: https://clck.ru/3T3boY
Created19 April 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/proventure

Growth

18,87418,90218,8886 August 2026 — 18,902 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,900 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,895 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,890 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,884 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,881 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,877 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,874 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,870–18,906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:3318,874-3
11 Aug 2026, 16:0218,877-4
10 Aug 2026, 18:1818,881-3
9 Aug 2026, 18:4218,884-6
8 Aug 2026, 16:5418,890-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:0018,895-5
6 Aug 2026, 16:4118,900-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:3318,902first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.21%
avg views ÷ 18,874 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held13 (23 June 202621 July 2026)
Views total4,650
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
97
Videos
47
Links
2,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

193 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7136.8%
5528.5%
👍3920.2%
🤣94.66%
🦄63.11%
💯42.07%
🤔42.07%
🤯31.55%
🤩21.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
15.4%
2 of 13 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,390
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,130
over 11 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwyKBia19 July 20269 July 2026
2W5zFJU7g6d121 July 202621 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 21 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,390 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJU7g6dPhoto

🌏 Venture Day: как VC инвестируют в AI? Друзья, вы уже не первый раз видите в канале события от сообщества heg.ai. Они делают классные актуальные ивенты, и текущий один из них – знакомьтесь, конференция Venture Day. Конечно, про AI сейчас из каждого утюга. Но это наша реальность, и лучше погрузиться в нее по полной и отделять шум от практических вещей. У ребят всегда фокус на второе. Конфа будет 2 дня. Онлайн. Спи

🔥61💯1

20 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC≈1,420 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📈 Как влияют гигантские IPO на публичный рынок? JP Morgan выпустил note по текущему буму IPO. 1/ Контекст: ▪️Ожидается, что в 2026 году объем IPO в США превысит $250B, почти как в рекордном 2021-м ($275B). Возможно, OpenAI свое размещение отложит, неизвестно как Anthropic, но тем не менее объемы растут. ▪️Но с 2021 года капитализация S&P 500 выросла на 55%, до $65T. ▪️То есть рынок вырос сильнее, чем объем размещен

🔥42👍1🤣1

16 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,840 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔝 Кто в топе токенмаксинга – и на чем они сидят? Ну что, запрыгиваем в последний вагон? Про токенмаксинг говорить уже в какой-то степени моветон, умные головы уже теперь не так измеряют работу с AI, но чтобы закрыть эту тему посмотрим на один leaderboard. Тема токенмаксинга, как вы знаете, родилась из внутреннего лидерборда Meta (признана в РФ экстремистской организацией и запрещена), который слили в прессу и очень

7🔥6👍4

11 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC≈2,640 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❗️Finance Director / CFO for a Family Office WANTED. Не совсем венчур, но вакансия крутая и может зайти части аудитории канала. Знакомый family office в Цюрихе ищет человека на позицию, которая объединяет CIO инвестиционного портфеля и personal CFO для принципала в одном классном Single Family Office. Редкий гибрид – позиция топовая, но надо работать руками очень много, поэтому в описании вакансии вы можете с ходу

9🤣6👍4

9 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,860 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwyKBia

🤖 AI-помощник для выплат команде – ребята из Kleos выкатили новую фичу! Большинство AI-ботов строят для продаж и поддержки. Kleos применили тот же подход к выплатам распределенным командам. Как это работает: ▪️Открываете чат, пишете "создай выплату 850 USD для Анны Петровой" – готово. ▪️Если выплата не одна, а их 100 – загружаете файл (Excel, PDF, CSV), AI разбирает за секунду. ▪️Все выплаты появляются со статусом

3🤣1

9 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC≈2,700 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤝 Как нанимают в Cursor, Cognition и Replit – и почему там больше нет LeetCode. Попался на глаза разбор от Business Insider про найм в топовых AI coding стартапах – и это прямо любопытная иллюстрация того, как рынок труда для инженеров переворачивается вслед за самим продуктом. К тому же еще и статья без paywall. 1/ Семь раундов и LeetCode – в прошлом: ▪️Cursor и Kilo (портфель General Catalyst) заменили классическ

👍11🤔4💯3🔥32

8 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC≈2,150 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 The VC Inbound (and a Bit of Outbound) Survey 2026. Друзья, как вы знаете, Денис некоторое время назад запустил блог на Substack под названием VC Happens. Сегодня там прошел релиз собственного исследования – опрос 67 инвесторов о том, как они реально работают с входящими питчами, NDA, рефералами и колд-аутричем. Хотелось собрать не ту картину, которая звучит на панельных дискуссиях, а понять, что происходит на пр

🔥17🦄64👍1

1 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC≈2,150 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎩 Six of the top ten emerging AI markets are agent-related. Прикольная табличка из недавнего отчета от CB Insights по агентам в enterprise. Прям с ходу погнали посмотрим. 1/ Смотрим на топ-10 emerging AI markets по Mosaic Score (для справки, это скоринговая модель CB Insights, которая оценивает потенциал частных компаний): ▪️IT Ops AI Agents – 651. ▪️Know Your Agent (KYA) – 650. ▪️CRM & Relationship Intelligence –

👍5🔥3

29 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,160 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🐶 YC-backed unicorn в наглую скопировал open source проект – или нет? Такой кейс должен был случиться. Вы наверняка видели кучу скиллов, которые позволяют навайбкодить интерфейс, аналогичный какому-то оригиналу. Является ли это плагиатом? Формально это не кража кода, потому что вайб код просто копирует интерфейс. Вопрос только, где теперь проходит грань между "вдохновился" и "украл". 1/ Что случилось: ▪️YC-backed и

🔥9🤯32🤣1

27 Jun 2026, 10:48 UTC≈2,050 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

8 каналов, где строят компании и фонды 👇 Давно не было крутых папок, но тут проВенчур стал частью одной классной. В одной папке - фаундеры, инвесторы и продакты со сделками и реальными цифрами. Не теоретики. Ниже коротко про еще 7 каналов из подборки (про проВенчур вы же уже знаете, да?) AI в продукте и маркетинге руками: • Миша Карпов - ProductCamp, ex-CPO Skyeng • Наташа Дудина - ex-CMO Fitmost, маркетинг и AI

👍4🔥32

26 Jun 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,950 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📊 Куда уходят деньги в AI: чек важнее лейбла стадии. Andrew Sorohan (Intersection) на данных Harmonic собрал 631 раунд pre-seed/seed/Series A в AI за март-май 2026 (SF Bay, NYC, London) на $10B. Сама статья про размытие границ стадий, но там еще классный график с разбивкой по категориям достаточно гранулярной – куда инвестируют больше всего. 1/ Структура early stage венчурных инвестиций по категориям: ▪️AI Infrast

🔥74👍3

25 Jun 2026, 16:52 UTC≈1,830 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🦢 Месси – GOAT, а Маса Сон – ГУСЬ! Вот такой заход для тех, кто следит за чемпионатом мира. Но сейчас не об этом. 1/ Начнем издалека – про сервис, который удобно мониторить, что сейчас обсуждают в Twitter. ▪️Недавно перезапустился Digg. ▪️Он агрегирует новости по самым горячим темам в Twitter за день. ▪️Если вы не сидите в Twitter активно, но хотите понимать тренды – удобная штука. ▪️Тема в основном про AI, но не т

8🔥3🤩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @proventure. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 80,889 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“proVenture (проВенчур)” (@proventure), 18,874 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proventure.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.