Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 57 days, net -554. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,859–56,596 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Oct 2026, 02:38
55,944
-217
18 Sept 2026, 09:55
56,161
+4
16 Sept 2026, 00:58
56,157
+9
14 Sept 2026, 08:19
56,148
-18
12 Sept 2026, 15:57
56,166
-44
10 Sept 2026, 11:40
56,210
-35
7 Sept 2026, 05:40
56,245
-49
4 Sept 2026, 11:42
56,294
-16
2 Sept 2026, 21:27
56,310
-5
1 Sept 2026, 23:13
56,315
-13
31 Aug 2026, 23:57
56,328
-17
30 Aug 2026, 20:39
56,345
-22
29 Aug 2026, 21:32
56,367
-6
29 Aug 2026, 00:07
56,373
+15
27 Aug 2026, 23:24
56,358
+41
27 Aug 2026, 00:27
56,317
-12
25 Aug 2026, 21:23
56,329
-10
25 Aug 2026, 00:07
56,339
+3
23 Aug 2026, 12:25
56,336
-1
21 Aug 2026, 20:38
56,337
first reading
Engagement
253 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.75%
avg views ÷ 55,944 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,900
136 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
136
of 253 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
253 (3 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
665,900
Reactions total
7,807
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Oct 2026, 17:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18m 37s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45,130 reactions across 243 posts, in 69 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🍾
30,542
67.7%
😁
3,006
6.66%
❤
2,214
4.91%
🤡
1,468
3.25%
👍
1,270
2.81%
🔥
1,113
2.47%
💩
952
2.11%
🥴
486
1.08%
👏
472
1.05%
🌚
305
0.676%
🤣
295
0.654%
😭
251
0.556%
😍
238
0.527%
💯
216
0.479%
🤔
215
0.476%
❤🔥
158
0.35%
🥰
150
0.332%
🦄
116
0.257%
💔
106
0.235%
👀
94
0.208%
49 further kinds
1,463
3.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 253 of the 253 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45,641 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 253 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.95%
10 of 253 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
10
posts carrying an erid · 10 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,760
over 10 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,280
over 243 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2RanykdnncT
1
25 September 2026
25 September 2026
2Ranyo1jL7m
1
19 September 2026
19 September 2026
2SDnjc36HEK
1
7 September 2026
7 September 2026
2SDnje2XWmZ
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
2SDnjesgvnF
1
14 September 2026
14 September 2026
2VtzqwTU6Gt
1
25 September 2026
25 September 2026
2VtzqwwVkQb
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
2W5zFJkLX7f
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FjX3XWp3S2pRjLCtd5eCThAdJVgfgkZ
1
14 August 2026
14 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FyvESfRjpCHfCbjcdKRrswC2RRpYWXY
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 253 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Помимо полутора тысяч мне на карту по вступившему с сегодняшнего дня в силу закону о платформенной там есть еще пара-тройка важных пунктов. Они касаются и е-коммерсов, и сами платформы, и покупателей, и платформенно-занятых… Всех, короче.
Запостили свою интерпретацию нововведений и изменений сегодня примерно все, но самые толковые – Ozon – у них вышли тесты для ПВЗье и продавцов. Кому интересно, гляньте, там сначала…
Немного слайдов со статистикой по ДТП с участием курьеров.
– последние два года идет рост ДТП с участием курьеров, на слайдах самые последние данные с 1 января по 31 августа 2026 года
– места, где чаще всего случается ДТП: дворы, выезд из дворов, тратуары.
– ДТП чаще всего страдают сами курьеры (больше половины)
Фотки шляпные с таких экранов получаются, но вы глазастые, рассмотрите. На всякий, кинул файлом в коммен…
Оч прикольная рекламная кампания у ВкусВилла: они разместили банерку с рекламой своей доставки за демонстрационными дверьми в шоуруме Torex в Москве.
Слоган: «Доставка до любой двери».
Без посевов она сработает примерно никак, зато нишево. Но я поделился. На благо продуктов с чистым составом.
👍 «Из коммерса в е-коммерса»
Е-коммерсы из Альфа-Банка спросили у селлеров, сколько они тратят на аналитику, и оказалось, что 70% из них сталкивались с околесицей вместо данных в разных сервисах аналитики, поэтому качественные данные для многих сегодня стали привычной статьей расходов: 83% селлеров тратят на данные около 28к рублей в месяц.
Форматы, которые покупают:
1) 33% — за фиксированный тариф
2) 25% — за модули
3) 38% — за гибрид
«Реальн…
Сбер заработал больше всех в России – 1,7 трлн рублей в 2025 году, а в H1 2026 уже больше 1 трлн чистыми. Порадуемся искренне за Сбер, нам всем бы так.
👍 «Из коммерса в е-коммерса»
Магнит запустил свою «Яндекс Доставку» – называется «Магнит Посылки». Физики могут отправлять что-то по городу, юрики могут подключить интернет-магазины и отправлять заказы клиентам по межгороду.
Я попытался заказать доставку по городу, все курьеры оказались уже заняты, увы и ах.
👍 «Из коммерса в е-коммерса»
У отельеров свой Е-ком: «РБК Исследования» собрали карту рынка онлайн-бронирования жилья и насчитали 150+ сервисов, где можно оформить бронь без перехода на другую площадку.
Тут и универсалы типа «Яндекс Путешествий», «Авито Путешествий» и «Островка», и сервисы для отдельных типов жилья, и туроператоры. Плюс собственные каналы объектов размещения: сайты, соцсети и даже телефон.
Знатный подгон от РБК лежит в коммент…
Showing the 12 most recent of 253 posts we hold for @hikollegi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Media Rare @media_rare · 25,869 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
Свободная касса (ритейл & e-com) @svobodakassa · 31,622 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
коллеги, не сутультесь @bardachko · 564,015 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Ozon HQ @ozonhq · 29,397 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
MPGO @mpgo_ru · 81,388 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
Клуб партнёров на маркетплейсах @club_partners · 19,788 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 September 2026
Душнотека Грека @zolotoygrek_life · 41,325 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Владислав Бакальчук @WBakalchuk · 47,618 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Shopper’s @newspotreb · 26,868 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 September 2026
Клиент @yourtypicalclient · 47,605 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026
Татьяна Ким @kimtatyana2024 · 89,644 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
Фичизм @fichism · 25,311 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Околоритейл @okoloretail · 36,806 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
👨🏻💻/ Марат Юсупов @maratyus · 106,088 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
Красный маркетинг Гиязова @aaaredmarketing · 276,080 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Кухня ритейла @retail_kitchen · 65,983 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Яндекс для предпринимателей @yandexbusiness · 78,500 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
AdIndex @adindex · 30,593 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
FMCG Report @fmcg_ru · 43,144 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Маша Полуянова @mashapoluyanova · 64,916 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Про tech и этих @protechietich · 20,530 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026
Около кассы | Ритейл @okolokass · 19,588 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 October 2026
#Фудтех @foodtechonline · 21,183 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 September 2026
Пиши Касука @pishi_kasuka · 26,592 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 124 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Из коммерса в е-коммерса” (@hikollegi), 55,944 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hikollegi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.