Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ламповая 🔥библиотека

Channel

Ламповая 🔥библиотека

@lamplib

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,160subscribers

-161 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001668782190
TypeChannel
Username@lamplib
Created23 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lamplib

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1606,3216,240.56 August 2026 — 6,321 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,321 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,314 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,309 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,306 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,300 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,294 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,288 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,276 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,269 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,262 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,261 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,260 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,253 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,229 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,214 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,206 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,202 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,197 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,191 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,187 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,181 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,176 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,173 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,165 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,160 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,136–6,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 09:496,160-5
6 Nov 2026, 03:496,165-8
3 Nov 2026, 02:466,173-3
30 Oct 2026, 18:386,176-5
27 Oct 2026, 21:476,181-6
25 Oct 2026, 04:376,187-4
21 Oct 2026, 18:196,191-6
18 Oct 2026, 10:566,197-5
15 Oct 2026, 17:046,202-4
12 Oct 2026, 18:266,206-8
6 Oct 2026, 08:226,214-15
29 Sept 2026, 00:196,229-24
19 Sept 2026, 14:006,253-7
15 Sept 2026, 08:416,260-1
11 Sept 2026, 18:006,261-1
7 Sept 2026, 14:186,262-7
2 Sept 2026, 23:576,269-7
30 Aug 2026, 13:186,276-12
27 Aug 2026, 04:056,288-6
23 Aug 2026, 19:056,294first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.95%
avg views ÷ 6,160 subscribers
Avg views / post
182
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held33 (19 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total2,184
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 06s
Average length
2m 01s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 31 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3126.5%
🔥2723.1%
❤1412.0%
🤣108.55%
😁97.69%
👀43.42%
👏43.42%
😱43.42%
🎉32.56%
🏆21.71%
💩21.71%
🤔21.71%
😭10.855%
🙏10.855%
🤬10.855%
🤯10.855%
🥰10.855%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 05:05 UTC94 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @chepuchovojePhoto

Для людей в древности весь мир был населен духами. Духи были причиной всего. Пришёл зверь в лес – духи, ушёл – духи, родился кто-то – духи, умер… ну, вы поняли. Духи шуршали в листве, выглядывали из воды, прятались в костре, а иногда поселились и в человеке. Но обычный человек их не видел, поэтому нужен был кто-то специальный, чтобы с ними договориться. Для этого появились шаманы. Они могли принести удачу в охоте, у…

👍2

4 Nov 2026, 15:30 UTC110 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @mspiridonov

Железные душнилы наступают! Business Insider пишет, что клиенты стали всё чаще поручать общение со службами поддержки собственным ИИ-агентам. Те невозмутимо висят на линии и готовы часами выяснять статус заказа или раз за разом переподтверждать бронь. В общем, душнят и выносят мозг с полной самоотдачей. Любовь к технологиям тут ни при чём: людям просто надоело тратить время на рутинные и неприятные звонки – спорить…

👍1😱1

2 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @cho_opyatVideo

Всё, страшно, вырубай!😂 А вообще, не очень-то и смешно.... Полегче там с чат-ботами. Мы нейронки не демонизируем. Классная тема (главное помнить, что к пустой голове ИИ не прикладывают👀). И не делегировать всё подряд. Рутину - да пожалуйста! (только про фактчекинг не забываем, а то у нейронок галлюцинации случаются частенько). А там где надо покреативить, подумать, эмпатию включить, критическое мышление опять же..…

👍3

2 Nov 2026, 04:56 UTC161 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @kray_rodnoyPhoto

❤️ Веселый, уютный, искренний, а моментами очень трогательный… Именно таким получился праздник книг и семейного творчества от группы компаний «Родное слово». Более 500 человек стали частью этого чудесного события, которое объединило семьи, творчество и любовь к родному языку. Волнительно и ярко прошла выставка работ победителей Всероссийского конкурса «Моя семья — моя Россия». Он собрал более 1300 участников из 47 …

👏1

31 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC164 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @lukyanenko_post

Смешная история Девушка написала роман в жанре фэнтези. Ну, придуманный мир, в нем живут два условных народа, поклоняются разным богам, издревле враждуют. Роман не читал, но допустим, что хороший. Отдаёт в издательство. Ей возвращают с пометками по всему тексту. Цитирую по памяти, конечно. На фразу "Их злые боги требуют убивать нас" - пометка "оскорбление религии, разжигание религиозной розни". На фразу "Все эти подо…

👍4❤2

29 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC201 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @pochuvstvuisvoyurealnostPhoto

РИСКНИ Шаг номер раз — я здесь и я живу, /все мысли шум и гам прервали свой/. Шаг номер два — я есть и я дышу /вдох-выдох, слёзы капают росой/. Шаг номер три — я здесь и я в сейчас: /всё прошлое есть семя и песок/. Четвёртый шаг, я — путь и я — компа'с, /всё — опыт, он прекрасен между строк!/ Есть пятый шаг, шаг номер шесть, и семь /путь от себя к себе длинною в век!/ Восьмой... и сотый — бег от чуждых схем: /на …

🔥3❤2🏆1

29 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC209 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @pochuvstvuisvoyurealnostVideo

"РИСКНИ" Марина Агат Читает Сергей Зволинский (Серый) Монтаж видео Сергей Зволинский (Серый) #Путь_к_себе

❤2🔥2🏆1

28 Oct 2026, 07:50 UTC194 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

*** Тот случай, когда онлайн упорно рвётся в офлайн. Уже в книжных магазинах 😁 (подсмотрено у @xarva)

😁3

27 Oct 2026, 14:13 UTC186 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @antonvolkov

Этот День отца совпал с днём 15 лет назад, когда мне прямо в руки принесли из родильной операционной мою дочку Лизу, и я стал отцом. А ещё совпадение, что ровно два года назад мы провели первый плейтест нашей игры (есть даже короткое видео). Можно сказать, стали отцами нашего ещё совсем крошечного проекта, который к сегодня повзрослел, окреп и скоро уж заживёт своей взрослой жизнью. Весь день хожу размышляю об отцо…

🎉3

25 Oct 2026, 09:48 UTC206 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @prolread

Скажу сразу, ближайшие пару недель я буду читать ЕЩЕ МЕНЬШЕ. Отпуск... Но пока я жду отпуска, в сети набрел на статью о том, что делать, если ручка не пишет. Нашел кучу способов. Половина сводится к тому, чтобы подуть, вторая половина это попытки расписать ручку на бумаге, ластике, подошве от обуви и тэдэ. Но этого поста не было бы, если бы не трешанинка. Возьмите зажигалку и подержите шариковый кончик ручки над ее…

👀1🤣1😁1

23 Oct 2026, 17:47 UTC232 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Вот такие нынче литературные конкурсы посвИщают В.И. Далю ) Как думаете, нейрослоп или ошибка? @lamplib

👀3

21 Oct 2026, 11:49 UTC277 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @mayatalelelePhoto

➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Если вы не сдавали и не планируете сдавать ЕГЭ, то навряд ли знаете (если не филолог, конечно, по образованию), что в русском языке есть практически одинаковые глаголы, которые надо писать по-разному: "обезводить"/"обезводеть", "обессилить"/"обессилеть" и ещё несколько таких же с одинаковым началом. ✨Придумала, как легче запомнить их написание, чтобы не прибегать к терминам "переходный/непереходный глагол"…

👍3🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @lamplib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Инструментальная музыка
@zolotaya_kollekciy · 23,982
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ламповая 🔥библиотека” (@lamplib), 6,160 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lamplib.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.