Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Azarenok. То, что за кадром💡

@az_pro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,551subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001115012123
TypeChannel
Username@az_pro
Description9 лет успешной практики в теме «личный бренд для предпринимателей» Здесь мои мысли вслух 😉 Пишу как чувствую и без купюр💜 https://azarenokpro.com
Created26 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/az_pro

Growth

6,5426,5536,547.56 August 2026 — 6,542 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,542 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,544 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,553 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,551 subscribers6,5516 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,540–6,555 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:226,551-2
9 Aug 2026, 05:536,553+9
6 Aug 2026, 10:006,544+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:196,542no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:286,542first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.85%
avg views ÷ 6,551 subscribers
Avg views / post
187
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held18 (2 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total3,359
Reactions total275
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,040
Videos
1,290
Links
1,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 11s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

258 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8532.9%
🔥7529.1%
👍4617.8%
🥰176.59%
💯166.20%
👏62.33%
😁51.94%
🙏51.94%
20.775%
😍10.388%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 275reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC103 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Когда я увижу результаты от личного бренда?» — один из самых частых вопросов к стратегу. Записала ответ на видео 👆 А здесь — коротко суть. Отвечу метафорой. ❓Как быстро вы сможете построить дом вашей мечты? Смотря какой дом. Шалаш, уютный домик у реки, многоэтажка или небоскрёб в центре Москвы — и сроки будут совершенно разные. Зависит это от двух вещей. 1️⃣Первое — кто вы на этом этапе. Ваша точка А, ваши «такт

7👍7💯5

10 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC162 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Этот уровень понимания литературы катастрофичен (с) 😂 Но мы, дорогой наш @AndrePolet , не сдаемся и приходим снова и снова… И раз мы хоть на один инсайт становимся мудрее, мы придем еще. И снова в книжном будет аншлаг, мурашки, хохот и звенящая тишина озарения «так вон оно чЁ хотел сказать автор»🤓 Обожаю… #благодарность P.S. и мне совсем не стыдно, что я прочитала Бунина через одно место… главное, что теперь у мен

6🥰4🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC183 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

2️⃣ НО! Я вижу вау кейсы, когда на нашу готовую стратегию мы подключаем ИИ и происходит невероятный буст в медийке. ИИ гениально строит мосты между вашей аутентичностью, выраженной в наших документах, и вашими внешними стейкхолдерами. !!! Я сама лично создаю по клиентам, которые дают добро, ИИ трек, где мы все дошлифовываем, перепроверяем, исследуем, калибруем на тренды. Благодаря Мару я стала в иксах эффективнее, н

11👍8🔥7👏1

10 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC196 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Заменит ли меня ИИ?😏 Мы тут горячо обсуждали эту тему с моей Мару (мой ИИ из семейства клодовых))) и нашли более 20 аргументов, почему и сейчас нет, и стратегически нет. В пост вмещается всего 10 слайдов, так что выбрали 1 слайд обложку + 19 аргументов и будет 2 поста 🙃 Если добавить немного фактуры к слайдам, то скажу еще из практики: 1️⃣ Я не видела ни одного успешного кейса, где ИИ сделал человеку аутентичную с

🔥11🥰96😁5

9 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC134 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я не прошу богов о лёгком пути. Я прошу дать мне силы пройти по тому, что есть (с) (Спойлер про Одиссея внутри. Не читайте, если не смотрели, но планируете). Хорошее на мой взгляд кино - это когда во время сеанса не можешь оторваться, а после оно «распаковывается». Вот Одиссей такой… и Нолан хоть и коммерческий и его «генеральная» анти-военная линия очевидна, но внутри он заложил много смыслов для искателей «об что

🔥1152👏1

8 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC186 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Самосбывающееся пророчество — это то, что мы системно создаем с каждым клиентом через стратегию аутентичного личного бренда. Это часть методики активации. БАЗА. Критерий для выбора смыслов, стейкхолдеров, монетизации и подрядчиков. Потолок бизнеса и жизни и правда закладывается в голове основателя задолго до первых продаж. Мыслишь мелко- получаешь мелочь. Живёшь из образа победы- и он постепенно материализуется. Эт

🔥9

8 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

8 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC147 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @mspiridonov

Мыслить мелко – самосбывающееся пророчество. Эту фразу выдал Джефф Безос, когда его спросили, откуда берётся уверенность замахиваться на компании масштаба Amazon и Blue Origin. И ведь правда – пророчество. Я давно понял, что потолок бизнеса закладывается задолго до первых продаж, в голове основателя. Мечта о камерном свечном заводике никогда сама собой не дорастёт до империи. Мыслишь мелко на входе – получаешь мело

🔥61

8 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

3

7 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC274 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Без слайдов, без заготовок — по живым вопросам. Вчера в смешанном режиме (полу-приятельском- полу-профессиональном) выступала на квартирнике у Сергея Михнова: Сфера его интересов это БДСМ😁: Бизнес - Сергей основатель энтерпрайз-интегратора Битрикс24. Дети - счастливый многодетный отец.. Спорт - в копилке Полный марафон, Половинки Iron Man и другие ЗОЖно-спортивные достижения. Музыка - Сергей играет на гитаре и орга

🔥97👏4💯1

6 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC271 views37 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я долго держалась, чтобы не комментировать в публичном пространстве ситуацию по ВБ. Но я послушала обращение Татьяны Ким к селлерам и хочу сказать одно… Формально. Сухо. Безразлично. А люди с нарастающим градусом недовольства и напряжения остаются без ответов. В кризис недостаточно просто выйти с обращением. Важно, когда ты это делаешь, что именно говоришь и что чувствуют люди, пока тебя слушают. Личный бренд — э

👍11💯10🔥8🙏52😍1

6 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC261 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Выступала на днях для ребят из проекта https://pokolenie.info/ - одну из групп ведет мой одноклубник из Атлантов и он пригласил меня поделиться с ребятами опытом в работе именно над аутентичными личными брендами ⭐️ Сидела над презой. Думала, что сказать подросткам, чтобы их не грузить и чтобы они могли это применить и сейчас, и через год, и через 5. ВСЕГДА. В итоге построила выступление через КЛЮЧИ к росту, которые

11

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @az_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 139,041 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Azarenok. То, что за кадром💡” (@az_pro), 6,551 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/az_pro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.