Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 99 days, net -76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93,713–94,432 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 23:58
93,796
-27
10 Nov 2026, 17:36
93,823
-8
9 Nov 2026, 02:36
93,831
-9
6 Nov 2026, 21:20
93,840
-13
5 Nov 2026, 20:59
93,853
-3
4 Nov 2026, 20:37
93,856
-17
3 Nov 2026, 20:37
93,873
+15
2 Nov 2026, 16:40
93,858
-14
1 Nov 2026, 15:57
93,872
-20
31 Oct 2026, 13:15
93,892
-34
30 Oct 2026, 10:28
93,926
+19
29 Oct 2026, 07:56
93,907
+3
28 Oct 2026, 04:36
93,904
+12
27 Oct 2026, 01:15
93,892
-13
26 Oct 2026, 01:51
93,905
-12
25 Oct 2026, 00:36
93,917
-9
23 Oct 2026, 22:10
93,926
+60
22 Oct 2026, 20:27
93,866
-23
21 Oct 2026, 16:50
93,889
+13
20 Oct 2026, 13:01
93,876
first reading
Engagement
152 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 204 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 93,796 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,600
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 152 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
152 (21 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
529,920
Reactions total
13,959
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,150
Videos
≈417
Links
≈719
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 30s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
52,629 reactions across 150 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
24,533
46.6%
🔥
14,619
27.8%
👍
6,373
12.1%
custom 5325851260555924342
5,805
11.0%
😁
646
1.23%
🤔
343
0.652%
custom 5461024494225234091
310
0.589%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 152 of the 152 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53,205 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 152 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,146
across the posts below
Posts paid on
133
of 152 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
448
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Oskar_Hartmann. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 152 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (21.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Сейчас бессмысленно учиться делать бизнес. Единственный способ научиться строить бизнес это строить бизнес.
Братцы, мир меняется быстрее, чем обновляются учебники.
Можно годами изучать кейсы компаний, которые добились успеха 20 лет назад. Но какое отношение их решения имеют к рынку, где каждую неделю появляются новые технологии и конкуренты?
Самое важное обучение происходит в процессе. Запустил продукт. Получил об…
Я очень сильно не хотел становиться публичным человеком.
Сейчас это, наверное, странно слышать от меня.
Но когда я строил свой бизнес, у меня вообще не было личного бренда. Никакого пиара. Я не выступал на конференциях и не стремился к публичности.
А потом я встретил своего наставника Жак-Антуана.
Он построил бизнес по модели, очень похожей на мою. И сказал мне одну вещь: «Оскар, этот бизнес требует публичности. …
Можно ли построить новую IKEA, не имея собственного производства?
На новой «Арене Единорогов» разбирали предпринимателя, который именно это и пытается сделать. И я считаю, что ему нужно увеличить свои амбиции раз в 40.
А ещё в выпуске — 16-летние предприниматели, финтех-проекты и реальные предложения инвесторов прямо на сцене.
12-й выпуск уже вышел. Посмотрите, какие бизнес-модели сегодня пытаются построить предпр…
В 17 лет я всеми силами пытался заработать деньги, чтобы отправиться в круиз по Карибам.
Тогда я жил в Америке, пробовал разные темы, искал возможности. И в итоге это стало самым крутым путешествием в моей жизни.
Поэтому я очень рад, что в мае 2027 года мы отправляемся в Карибику.
Самый роскошный лайнер, 7 остановок, 6 стран. Но самое главное для меня здесь, конечно, люди.
Предприниматели, инвесторы, люди, которы…
А что, если через 20 лет двум миллиардам людей вообще не нужно будет работать?
Братцы, я думаю, мы научимся жить без работы. И это не будет большой проблемой. Кто-то будет заниматься семьёй, спортом, путешествовать. Кто-то пойдёт в творчество, исследования, общественные проекты. Кто-то продолжит работать просто потому, что ему нравится.
Но здесь возникает гораздо более интересный вопрос.
А кто ты, если у тебя боль…
Жизнь состоит из множества мелочей и лишь нескольких важных событий. Некоторые люди живут только ради больших вещей и впадают в депрессию и уныние, потому что они случаются очень редко.
Нужно жить ради мелочей. Ведь именно в них и заключается суть жизни.
Я всю жизнь говорил «Просто делай». А сейчас говорю, что первый закон революции это выжить.
Братцы, мы живем в момент, когда каждую неделю появляются технологии, способные уничтожить целые рынки. Сегодня у тебя успешная компания, а завтра ее продукт уже никому не нужен.
И в такой ситуации многие идут all-in. Ставят все деньги на одну идею, надеясь поймать следующую большую волну.
Но если тебя вынесло из игры, ника…
Копирование стало легальным.
Я помню, как Оливер Самвер был в центре всеобщего внимания, потому что часто копировал успешные американские продукты пиксель в пиксель.
Забавная история, однажды одна из компаний в моем портфеле запустила телерекламу с похожим рекламным ходом, что и у его компании, и он пригрозил подать в суд.
Те времена, безусловно, ушли в прошлое.
Теперь достаточно просто задать ИИ хороший вопрос, …
ИИ это не новый интернет. Это революция совершенно другого масштаба.
Братцы, раньше мы изобретали инструменты. Молоток, печатный станок, компьютер, интернет. Они позволяли нам делать больше и быстрее. Но решения всегда принимал человек.
А искусственный интеллект может принять 3000 решений без вас. Вы даёте ему цель, инструменты, бюджет, и он начинает самостоятельно действовать. Это вообще другой порядок!
Мы движем…
У вас может быть 1000 гениальных идей от ChatGPT. Но сколько из них реально изменили вашу жизнь?
Когда я встретил своего наставника Жак-Антуана, в мире был дефицит информации. Он дал мне несколько советов. Для меня это была Библия. Я применял их, менял свои подходы, принимал решения.
А сегодня у каждого из нас тысячи переписок с ИИ. Мы получаем прекрасные ответы, закрываем чат и ничего не меняется.
Недавно я перес…
❤291🔥136👍67custom 532585126055592434229🤔5
Showing the 12 most recent of 152 posts we hold for @Oskar_Hartmann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Oskar_Hartmann edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @Oskar_Hartmann as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
4 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
44 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 174%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 152 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Музыка Силы Сообществ X10 Музыка @X10Music · 1,986#95
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Книги на миллион | бизнес блог @ikniga · 825,145 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Оперштаб Игорь Рыбаков @rybakovigor · 149,022 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Oleg Torbosov @TorbosovLife · 106,637 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Sokolovskiy @sokolay · 109,423 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Павел Гительман @potok_gitelman · 39,016 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
Гуринович делится! @gurinovich_shares · 29,269 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Алексей Ситников @drSit · 100,120 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
Денис Семенихин @DenisSemenikhin · 34,272 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Нейросети для предпринимателя @neural_for_business · 41,855 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии @petrosipovprivate · 47,994 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Маргулан Сейсембай @MargulanSeissembai · 206,597 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Артем Кей @artemmkey · 30,964 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Dreamer @dreamertim · 41,885 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Бизнес Подкасты @business_podcast · 171,801 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Книги | Аудиокниги @flibusta_anglysky · 366,197 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Ицхак Пинтосевич - Психология Торы @Isaac_Pintosevich · 27,354 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Club 500 @journal500 · 19,422 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026
Радислав Гандапас @radislavgandapascom · 52,898 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Алeксандр Орлов @alexandroorlov · 19,108 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 October 2026
Игорь Войтенко @realingvarvoitenko · 29,217 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
Михаил Дашкиев @mikhaildashkiev · 44,771 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Чирков Максим @maxchirtop · 48,551 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи @ryzov_igor · 46,714 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Аяз @AyazShabutdinov · 177,636 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 79 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оскар Хартманн” (@Oskar_Hartmann), 93,796 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Oskar_Hartmann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
