Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net +187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93,800–94,421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 01:58
94,059
-161
17 Sept 2026, 07:17
94,220
-74
15 Sept 2026, 07:00
94,294
-26
13 Sept 2026, 13:18
94,320
-29
11 Sept 2026, 19:36
94,349
+6
9 Sept 2026, 08:00
94,343
+229
6 Sept 2026, 02:17
94,114
-22
3 Sept 2026, 20:56
94,136
-15
2 Sept 2026, 11:42
94,151
-13
1 Sept 2026, 13:25
94,164
-16
31 Aug 2026, 16:34
94,180
+7
30 Aug 2026, 16:06
94,173
-18
29 Aug 2026, 15:12
94,191
+13
28 Aug 2026, 17:44
94,178
+9
27 Aug 2026, 19:27
94,169
+34
26 Aug 2026, 21:23
94,135
+10
26 Aug 2026, 00:23
94,125
+20
24 Aug 2026, 20:54
94,105
-7
23 Aug 2026, 05:35
94,112
+15
21 Aug 2026, 18:29
94,097
first reading
Engagement
83 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 94,059 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,800
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 83 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
83 (21 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
481,710
Reactions total
10,975
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 12:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,120
Videos
≈407
Links
≈705
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 38s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
29,028 reactions across 81 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12,820
44.2%
🔥
8,575
29.5%
👍
3,558
12.3%
custom 5325851260555924342
3,396
11.7%
😁
486
1.67%
🤔
99
0.341%
custom 5461024494225234091
94
0.324%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,604 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
774
across the posts below
Posts paid on
65
of 83 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
448
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Oskar_Hartmann. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 83 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Братцы, сняли брокаст в новом офисе 12 STOREEZ, одном из самых красивых офисов, которые я видел.
Оборот 12 Storeez за прошлый год составил почти 18 млрд рублей. Но главное, путь от небольшого проекта до международного бренда.
Сотни тысяч селлеров на маркетплейсах понимают: если нет бренда, нет бизнеса.
Можно ли построить бренд через маркетплейс? Что не делать, если хочешь построить бренд? Как выйти на международны…
Дисциплина это искусство не предавать самого себя
Большинство людей воспринимают дисциплину как наказание, ограничение, контроль. На самом деле дисциплина это верность себе будущему. Свобода будущего.
Люди, которые не контролируют свое поведение, зачастую в итоге теряют самоуважение и уверенность в себе.
Потому что в глубине души они знают, как часто они подводят самих себя и предают свой потенциал.
У предпринимателя может быть сто хороших идей. Но жизнь позволяет по-настоящему реализовать только несколько.
Поэтому важнее не научиться придумывать больше. Важнее научиться выбирать идею, которой действительно стоит отдать следующие десять лет своей жизни.
Братцы, вчера стартовали с новой группой «Основателя Единорога» 🦄
У всех участников уже есть предпринимательский опыт. Но впереди большая работа, каждый будет искать свою новую модель масштабируемого бизнеса.
Вчера собрались на ужине открытия в ресторане средиземноморской кухни Zea от холдинга Soho Family, познакомились и настроились на большую работу. А сегодня уже перешли к бизнес-моделям.
Для меня здесь один из…
Когда предприниматель становится инвестором
Любой предприниматель это инвестор. Сначала ты вкладываешь в свой бизнес, расширяешься.
В какой-то момент бизнес начинает зарабатывать больше, чем ты можешь в него эффективно вложить. Появляется свободный кэшфлоу, и ты инвестируешь уже его.
Главная ошибка тогда - искать доходность 25–30%, как в бизнесе. Но твой бизнес это твоя зона гения. То, чем ты занимаешься постоянно…
Вчера прошла Арена Единорогов.
10 предпринимателей вышли на сцену и представили свои проекты инвесторам.
Три проекта получили инвестиционные предложения на общую сумму более 40 млн ₽.
Вот за что я люблю Арену.
Ты месяцами строишь продукт, собираешь команду, ищешь клиентов. А потом выходишь на сцену и за несколько минут можешь изменить траекторию своей компании.
Поздравляю каждого участника, братцы!
Брофист 🤜🏻
Первая часть Арены Единорогов завершилась.
5 проектов вышли на питч. И 2 из них уже получили инвестиционные предложения.
Энергия сумасшедшая!!
Продолжаем. Все проекты и новости в канале Unicorn Arena @arenaunicorn
Мы на Арене Единорогов.
Предприниматели прошли большой путь: создали продукт, собрали команду, нашли первых клиентов. А сегодня вышли на сцену, чтобы представить свои проекты инвесторам.
Подробнее о проектах команда рассказывает в канале Unicorn Arena @arenaunicorn
Братцы, завтра мой любимый день. Арена Единорогов!
И у нас sold out. Все места заняты.
Предприниматели выходят на сцену и презентуют свои проекты инвесторам.
Я очень люблю этот формат, потому что питч это настоящее искусство. За несколько минут нужно раскрыть идею, показать масштаб проекта и убедить инвесторов, что ты способен построить большую компанию.
До встречи на Арене!
Брофист 🤜🏻
Прилетел в Кыргызстан на Иссык-Куль, чтобы поработать с предпринимателями.
Вчера провёл воркшоп «Тест на единорога». Сегодня прочитал лекцию.
Два дня говорили про предпринимательство, большие идеи и компании, способные менять рынки.
Преподавать людям, которые искренне хотят учиться — одна из лучших профессий в мире.
Оказывается, можно любить уже существующее, желать ему продолжения и всё равно стремиться.
Можно чувствовать достаточность собственной человеческой ценности и при этом ставить себе трудные цели.
Не всякое стремление должно питаться ощущением дефицита себя. Есть достигаторство 1.0, когда ты стремишься, потому что всё время недостаточно.
А есть достигаторство 2.0, когда уже достаточно, уже хорошо, уже есть ценность.…
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @Oskar_Hartmann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Oskar_Hartmann edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 174%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 50 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Музыка Силы Сообществ X10 Музыка @X10Music · 2,002#95
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Книги на миллион | бизнес блог @ikniga · 839,135 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Оперштаб Игорь Рыбаков @rybakovigor · 150,474 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
Oleg Torbosov @TorbosovLife · 107,412 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Sokolovskiy @sokolay · 109,366 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Павел Гительман @potok_gitelman · 38,562 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
Гуринович делится! @gurinovich_shares · 29,434 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Алексей Ситников @drSit · 99,578 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
Денис Семенихин @DenisSemenikhin · 34,374 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
Нейросети для предпринимателя @neural_for_business · 42,632 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии @petrosipovprivate · 48,972 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Маргулан Сейсембай @MargulanSeissembai · 209,546 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Артем Кей @artemmkey · 31,339 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Dreamer @dreamertim · 40,879 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Бизнес Подкасты @business_podcast · 172,440 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Книги | Аудиокниги @flibusta_anglysky · 369,621 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Ицхак Пинтосевич - Психология Торы @Isaac_Pintosevich · 27,348 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Радислав Гандапас @radislavgandapascom · 53,031 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Игорь Войтенко @realingvarvoitenko · 29,573 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
Михаил Дашкиев @mikhaildashkiev · 43,937 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Чирков Максим @maxchirtop · 49,529 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи @ryzov_igor · 46,941 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Аяз @AyazShabutdinov · 179,549 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Бизнес-клуб «Атланты» @bc_atlanty · 31,335 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Александр Кравцов | Следующий уровень @akravtsovcom · 33,179 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 75 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Оскар Хартманн” (@Oskar_Hartmann), 94,059 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Oskar_Hartmann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
