Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Y Combinator на каждый день

Channel

Y Combinator на каждый день

@y_everyday

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,063subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002103929800
TypeChannel
Username@y_everyday
DescriptionВнедряем в жизнь мысли из Y Combinator — акселератора, инвестировавшего в 3000+ стартапов. Капитализация выпускников $800B+, 100+ единорогов Первоисточник в комментариях каждого поста Бизнес-Тиндер: t.me/y_everyday/282 По рекламе и прочему: @egorre
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/y_everyday

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,0157,1067,060.56 August 2026 — 7,104 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,104 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,106 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,095 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,092 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,094 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,086 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,077 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,065 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,061 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,058 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,045 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,043 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,045 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,028 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,015 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,019 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,020 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,017 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,026 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,031 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,041 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,055 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,048 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,069 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,063 subscribers7,0636 August 20269 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,001–7,120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 02:287,063-6
5 Nov 2026, 15:277,069+21
2 Nov 2026, 17:587,048-7
30 Oct 2026, 15:317,055+14
28 Oct 2026, 00:147,041+10
24 Oct 2026, 22:067,031+5
21 Oct 2026, 12:557,026+9
18 Oct 2026, 16:447,017-3
15 Oct 2026, 19:417,020+1
12 Oct 2026, 16:407,019+4
6 Oct 2026, 05:597,015-13
29 Sept 2026, 00:407,028-17
19 Sept 2026, 00:367,045+2
14 Sept 2026, 14:197,043-2
10 Sept 2026, 21:597,045-13
5 Sept 2026, 11:007,058-3
1 Sept 2026, 10:047,061-4
29 Aug 2026, 16:377,065-12
26 Aug 2026, 07:077,077-9
23 Aug 2026, 11:277,086first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 7,063 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,870
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held45 (17 May 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total18,685
Reactions total198
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 18:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
200
Videos
5
Links
113

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,195 reactions across 45 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍49741.6%
❤29724.9%
🔥27322.8%
🦄715.94%
😁161.34%
🤯141.17%
💯90.753%
🤔70.586%
👎60.502%
🙏30.251%
🤡10.084%
🫡10.084%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
29
of 45 we hold a reading for · 64%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @y_everyday. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 45 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 11:44 UTC825 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Противоречивый совет Пола Грэма, который может вам помочь «Если люди не покупают ваш продукт, попробуйте спросить их, что они бы купили. Звучит очевидно, но на удивление мало фаундеров так делает, а это часто приносит ценные инсайты». Ему отвечают: Я делаю это постоянно. Очень часто мне отвечают: «Я не знаю». Пол: «Попробуйте спросить, какие у них есть проблемы. Что у них болит?» А другой человек возражает и даё…

👍11❤2🔥2🦄1

6 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,490 views20 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Почему учёным (и прочим умным людям) сложно построить стартап? И как это преодолеть? Навыки, за которые хвалят в науке, фаундеру стартапа мешают или просто не нужны. Чему умным надо отучиться, чтобы преуспеть в стартап-мире? Отвечает исследователь, ставший фаундером успешного стартапа Focal Systems, а теперь партнёр YC — Франсуа Шобар. №1. Метрики «тщеславия» VS то, что хотят люди. • В науке вы ориентируетесь на оц…

👍13❤5🔥2

3 Nov 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,740 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Как изменится человеческий труд с развитием ИИ? И что делать вам? Это вольный пересказ эссе «Каждый станет CEO» Макса Колыша, YC Visiting Partner. Чтобы понять, как будет выглядеть работа людей после появления AGI (ИИ, который справляется с любыми интеллектуальными задачами не хуже человека — прим.ред.), достаточно посмотреть на работу руководителей компаний. У CEO уже есть «интеллект по клику». Только у него это …

👍11❤4🦄1

2 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC≈1,450 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

#тематическая_интеграция Что вы знаете о венчурном фонде, кроме его удачных инвестиций? Когда присматриваешься к фонду, хочется понять, как там распоряжаются деньгами. Почему выбирают одни компании и пропускают другие? Что делают, когда инвестиция не сработала? Саша Журавлёв, основатель и управляющий Mento VC, довольно подробно пишет об этом в своём канале. Вот с чего можно начать: - Компании, в которые фонд реши…

👍3🦄3❤2

31 Oct 2026, 17:41 UTC≈1,790 views21 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Пол Грэм напоминает, что поднятие инвестиций — не самоцель «Раунды инвестиций — это не майлстоуны, до которых нужно добежать. Вашей целью НЕ должно быть поднятие раунда A. Вашей целью должно быть отсутствие нужды в инвестициях». Ему поддакивают, но неудачно: Меня раздражает, когда я вижу рекламу от стартапов, где говорят «мы только что подняли $10 млн». Вы подняли денег и потратили их на то, чтобы рассказать людя…

👍11❤3🔥3💯2🤔1😁1

28 Oct 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,690 views28 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Каких стартапов не хватает в Y Combinator? YC обновили традиционную рубрику RFS («Запросы на стартапы»). Ждут заявки до 2 ноября. Общий посыл: главные препятствия для развития ИИ лежат за пределами самих моделей. YC ожидают появления новой волны стартапов, которые будут пилить железо, инфраструктуру (в т.ч. финансовую) и софт — необходимые для внедрения AI в реальный сектор экономики. Вот полный список с кратким о…

👍13❤8🔥5🦄2

24 Oct 2026, 08:47 UTC≈2,030 views22 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Ваши клиенты жгут вам токены, и вы в минусе. Так и надо! Но с нюансом «Совершенно нормально не париться насчёт юнит-экономики инференса (= соотношениt того, сколько вы тратите на AI-токены для одного юзера, и сколько он вам платит — прим. ред.) для ваших самых первых пользователей. Я бы использовал топовые модели, даже если стоимость обслуживания этих пользователей будет выше того, что они вам платят. На раннем эт…

👍10❤7🔥3🤔1🦄1

20 Oct 2026, 07:51 UTC≈2,510 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Пилите продукт, а тут выпускают Claude X, который делает то же самое. Это приговор или ещё нет? Это главные мысли из разговора Далтона с Алексом Даниловичем (Magic Patterns, YC W23) — фаундером и CEO AI-инструмента для дизайна, который должен был быть «убит» Claude Design. Видео свежее, они до сих пор живы. • Magic Patterns были очень активными клиентами API Anthropic и не предполагали, что узнают о запуске такого …

❤15🔥9👍7

16 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC≈2,290 views18 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Неочевидный хак для продаж Когда вы предлагаете что-то потенциальному клиенту, попросите у него что-нибудь взамен. Если предлагаете скидку, то попросите за это сделать более крупный заказ или заключить договор до нужной вам даты. Этим вы не просто получаете взамен то, что вам самим выгодно. Тут ещё и психологический смысл: вы объясняете клиенту, почему (за что) он получает скидку. Если так не сделать, клиент може…

👍10❤4🔥2😁2

13 Oct 2026, 19:03 UTC≈1,870 views18 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Как сделать пивот, чтобы не заняться очередной хренью? Меняя идею, стартаперы периодически попадают в ад бесконечных пивотов (pivot hell). Это когда ты меняешь всё каждую неделю, переключаешься с одной идеи на другую, начитавшись соцсетей. Просто гонка за хайпом и тем, что пишут в Твиттере. Вот на что опереться, чтобы не влезть в фигню: • Попробуй найти идею, в которой ты хоть что-то понимаешь. • Или попробуй най…

👍9🦄4🔥3❤1🙏1

9 Oct 2026, 15:08 UTC≈2,030 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Чем отличаться от конкурентов, если вы все реально делаете одно и то же? «Фаундеры YC-стартапа переживали, что их рынок коммодитизировался (т.е. все продают примерно одно и то же, и клиенту нет разницы, у кого покупать — прим.ред.). Их бизнес — это продажа видеозаписей, сделанных от первого лица, где люди выполняют физическую работу. Такой контент используют для обучения роботов. Подобных компаний много, и некоторы…

👍11🔥4🦄3❤2

6 Oct 2026, 06:48 UTC≈2,230 views31 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

Стартап, построивший самолёт. Как у них это получилось? (Всем, кто пилит hard tech — обязательно к прочтению). В сентябре на YouTube-канале YC вышел ролик про Heart Aerospace (W19) — они 7 лет строили электрический самолёт, и в августе этого года он наконец полетел. Я для вас выделил ключевые штуки, из которых, как мне кажется, сложился их текущий успех. А историю целиком можете глянуть в ролике, ссылка в комментар…

👍16🔥9❤4🦄2

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @y_everyday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@y_everyday edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 November 2026
Most recent edit
7 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @y_everyday as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 79,154
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
The Edinorog 🦄
@Theedinorogblog · 44,127
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов
@bossofyourboss · 27,282
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Венчур по Понятиям
@ventureStuff · 20,331
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
СберСтартап
@sberstartup · 40,941
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 29 August 2026
Индекс дятла
@dindex · 22,222
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
Forbes. Идеи для бизнеса
@forbes_business · 26,699
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 12 September 2026
GPT/ChatGPT/AI Central Александра Горного
@aioftheday · 44,602
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Витрина стартапов
@showstartup · 26,848
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026
Rinat Aliev | Channel
@telega_Rinata · 20,583
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 October 2026
Tech Crunch
@techcrunchru · 16,299
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
Русский венчур
@rusven · 24,986
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
Стартап дня. Александр Горный.
@startupoftheday · 62,567
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Kumar & Solo
@solokumi · 40,499
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
kyrillic
@kyrillic · 61,233
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Квест Теория Каст и Ролей
@alexkrol · 18,734
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 October 2026
Кутергин в огне 🔥
@kutergin_on_fire · 62,326
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Максим Спиридонов
@mspiridonov · 69,790
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Фонд содействия инновациям
@fasietalks · 23,024
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Y Combinator на каждый день” (@y_everyday), 7,063 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/y_everyday.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.