Итак, продуктивной недели всем, кто понимает, что ему принадлежит только то, что нельзя забрать. А любые «циферки на экране» забирать легко и просто. Пользуясь случаем, спешу напомнить, что все ваши накопленные непосильным трудом USDT принадлежат не вам, а недружественной компании Тезер, и я очень рекомендую срочно их снять или переложить)

Channel
Итак, это Панов
@itakblet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,802subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001343485324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itakblet |
| Created | 27 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itakblet |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 24,802 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 24,798 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 24,799 | +12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 24,787 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 24,789 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 24,788 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 24,785 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 24,785 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.3%
- avg views ÷ 24,802 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,530
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (26 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 90,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Кстати, как амбассадор русского высокотехнологического предпринимательства (в мире именуемого диптехом) я крайне люблю посещать тех, кто работает на мировой научно-инженерной передовой. А еще приводить вместе с собой сильных ребят, порой задумывающихся о смене рода деятельности — с обычной работы на самую лучшую работу в мире, где можно технологиями поменять мир. Ну или иного участия в этих великих делах, если жизнь …
Photo, posted without a caption
Кстати, может показаться, что я слишком критичен к родной стране, но мы в высшей лиге, хуле, надо соответствовать. Большинству социумов даже постановка вопроса о цели с дедлайнами за пределами их жизни кажется абсурдной. Не будем судить их строго, не всем дана ответственность за человеческую цивилизацию. PS: Вон у некоторых наций вообще, походу, предназначение — убиться по команде о броню наших танков. С такими сло…
Итак, еще большая проблема нашей русской культуры — это отсутствие видения на хотя бы смешные 300 лет. Из-за отсутствия этого видения вся стратегия укладывается в «нам бы день простоять да ночь продержаться». Радует, что у нас длинная воля и мы держаться можем очень долго. Но хотелось бы вместе договориться ради чего.
Итак, продуктивной недели всем, у кого первым делом первым делом самолеты. И девочки тоже первым делом, и дети первым делом, и все первым делом, иначе вообще ничего никогда не успеть.
Итак, главная концептуальная проблема нашей страны — это отсутствие критической массы смелых лидеров, которые меняют правила в сторону повышения эффективности вверенного им подразделения. Большая часть просто пытаются сделать максимум в ежедневно сужающемся коридоре возможностей по причине разрастания бюрократии. Проще говоря, каждые пару процентов уменьшения вероятности сесть увеличивает объем петель согласований и…
Photo, posted without a caption
Кстати, еще более тупо «обижаться» на корпорацию и «принципиально» не пользоваться после этого их услугами или товарами. Крупная компания — это бездушный механизм, работающий на алгоритмах, у него нет души. Ей даже умереть не страшно, потому что болты и гайки не испытывают эмоций. Не пользоваться услугами корпорации, после того как однажды какая-то гайка вам нахамила или какой-то болт заби на вашу просьбу так же нел…
Итак, продуктивной недели всем, кто понимает, что все люди кажутся нормальными лишь до тех пор, пока ты не узнаешь их получше.
В продолжении поднятой темы
Итак, у нас уже был разбор эксперта по замене белковых сотрудников небелковыми (aka оркестрирование ИИ агентов), а в этот вторник проговорим о более традиционной экономии — за счет замены людей подороже на людей подешевле, обычно завезенных из других стран. И я сейчас не только про рабочих на стройку, заводы и уборку полей, а еще и про вполне себе «офисные» должности. 28 июля (ВТ) в 20:00. Тема: иммиграция в Россию …
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @itakblet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 37,721 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@kuserbaevkarim · 1082 postsNeiry Mind Tracker и не только
@mindtacker · 1,6812 postsДизайн Дистинкции | Cojocaru Maxim
@designdistinction · 6181 postГуринович делится!
@gurinovich_shares · 29,8131 postIT Kvas
@itkvas · 331 postКапли ртути
@mercury_octave · 1,3881 postНовости сообщества НЕЙРОНЕТ
@neuronet_ic · 2731 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@antonpallych · 8,5314 postsGame of Drones
@droneswar · 6,1272 postsКапли ртути
@mercury_octave · 1,3882 postsY Combinator на каждый день
@y_everyday · 7,0952 postsКирилл Кириллов - Кириллица
@cyrillickkk · 3051 postethgen live
@ethgen_live · 1521 postСергей Мороз
@greymoroz · 2841 postКрч, Корицкий
@koritskiy_terms · 2181 postКоля Митин говорит
@nickmitinsays · 2,4151 postСТРАТЕГИЯ | Анна Никулина
@STRATEGYNikulina · 1,7871 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@crimsondigest · 139,981
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@prostoecon · 292,992
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
@auantonov · 320,771
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Итак, это Панов” (@itakblet), 24,802 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itakblet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.