Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Круче Чака: Венчур 2026

@Kruche4aka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,812subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002216126653
TypeChannel
Username@Kruche4aka
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Kruche4aka

Growth

1,8041,8121,8086 August 2026 — 1,805 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,805 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,804 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,809 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,812 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,803–1,813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:571,812+3
9 Aug 2026, 22:121,809+5
7 Aug 2026, 04:311,804-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:511,805no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:531,805first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.6%
avg views ÷ 1,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
645
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (27 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total5,809
Reactions total144
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 02s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6729.4%
🔥6729.4%
👍6026.3%
custom 5416015487525988007114.82%
💯73.07%
🦄52.19%
❤‍🔥41.75%
🫡31.32%
😁20.877%
👾10.439%
🤮10.439%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 247reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kruche4aka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC233 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mspiridonov

Этим летом примерял на себя роль акулы бизнеса – и вот можно посмотреть, что из этого вышло. Новый выпуск “Арены единорогов” уже на YouTube. Сам формат – российская версия Shark Tank: предприниматели вживую питчат свои проекты инвесторам, а те не стесняются в выражениях, давая оценку перспективности бизнеса выступающих. В жюри рядом со мной были создатель шоу Оскар Хартманн, сооснователь Hoff Михаил Кучмент, бизнес-

3

3 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC522 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👍 Классное событие получилось — «Арена единорогов» реально показала, что венчур в России жив! Я был там лично, в жюри, и атмосфера в Сочи оказалась ещё более огненной, чем может передать трансляция. Оскар Хартманн вновь подтвердил свой талант зажигать аудиторию и делать сложные инвесттемы доступными и увлекательными. Проекты — как всегда, микс сильных идей и спорных гипотез, но это и есть венчур) Один проект заце

6🔥5👍1

2 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,320 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️ Лизу Тихер в венчурной тусовке не случайно называют комьюнити-менеджером российского венчура — она в теме, она коммуникатор, и пока другие пишут стихи, она держит очаг горящим в венчурную зиму. Организатор «Стартех Премии» рассказывает, что реально произошло с российским венчуром после 2022 года — без домыслов, только факты и живой опыт. Разбираем бизнес-модель «Стартех» и почему платформа стала точкой сборки ста

15👍9custom 54160154875259880075

31 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC585 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🕯 Вчера на консультации снова столкнулся с феноменом, который ловлю уже не первый раз за этот год. В психологии есть концепция «нарциссического расширения» — это когда человек воспринимает свой проект не как отдельную сущность со своей логикой, а как продолжение самого себя. И вот к чему это приводит на практике. 👁 Видел человека, который платит бешеную аренду за офис своего любимого проекта, хотя в обычной жизни т

🔥145👾1💯1

28 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC626 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💡 Все каналы соцсетей работают по своей логике. Вот видно, как в начале года (точка 1) я принял решение подключить «Круче Чака» на LinkedIn. Почему? Платформа бизнесовая, русских там больше, чем ожидаешь, видимость со стороны организаторов мероприятий и других фондов хорошая, ну и даже стартапы присылают свои деки. ❓Как думаете, что случилось в точке 2, когда резко подскочило количество просмотров? Я объявил, что бу

👍127💯6🔥5

22 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC776 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Конечно, Максиму Спиридонову я задавал вопросы про edtech, и он щедро насыпал инсайтов. Про деньги тоже поговорили — как можно потерять $3 млн в венчуре и всё равно не потерять вкус к инвестициям. Записали всё это в новой студии на 55-м этаже Москва-Сити — вид шикарный, разговор ещё лучше. И, друзья, маленькая просьба. Увидел статистику: меньше 10% зрителей подкаста подписаны на канал в YouTube. Подпишитесь, пожа

🔥65👍2

22 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC607 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🦊 Заглянем в голову инвестору? Коллеги из «Академии инноваторов» попросили прокомментировать 5 красных флагов, которые инвестор видит в фаундере и презентации с первых минут. Записал 5 кругляшек прямо на Шри-Ланке 🌴 - конкретика без воды. Переходите в пост «Академии инноваторов», смотрите все видео и ставьте 🔥. #партнер #венчур #КручеЧака

👍6🔥5custom 54160154875259880074

21 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC610 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎥 Пока у нас идёт монтаж подкаста с иконой российского edtech Максимом Спиридоновым (выпуск ещё на этой неделе), хочу поговорить про совсем новый подход к edtech — тот, который сейчас реализует КодерЛаб. Классический edtech в России — это онлайн, платные лиды и борьба за внимание родителя в перегретом рынке рекламы. Именно по этому пути когда-то прошла «Нетология-групп» Максима, выросшая до миллиардной выручки. Коде

❤‍🔥4

19 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC530 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💡Почему ранний лидер поиска превратился в музейный экспонат В конце 90-х Lycos из Германии был заметнее Google. Но Lycos пытался быть всем сразу - портал, почта, хостинг, коммьюнити. Google делал одно - поиск - и делал его радикально лучше. Фокус дал три преимущества: быстрее продуктовые решения - понятный бренд («идём в Google») - масштабируемая монетизация вокруг одного ядра. Lycos растворился в зоопарке сервисов

👍13🫡3🤮1

15 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC703 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Мы недавно у Оскара Хартманна познакомились, а вчера икона российского edtech — Максим Спиридонов — заглянул в гости в «Круче Чака». Вместо сухого разговора про венчур вышло очень честно и по‑живому: как предприниматель строит проекты, что делают с головой и жизнью деньги после экзита, как отец пятерых детей теряет три миллиона долларов в венчуре и всё равно продолжает играть в долгую. Поговорили о том, как выгляд

10🔥9👍1

14 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC838 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎾 Падел я люблю, а как инвестор всё равно думаю: это хайп или реальный бизнес? В новом выпуске «Круче Чака» разбираем новый спорт с Мариной Амельченко - директором самого центрального падел-клуба столицы. Говорим про деньги, метрики, игроков и будущее рынка. ⚠️ Самые 5 прикольных комментариев получат по 1 часу на корте в центре Москвы. В жюри Марина, Мартин и Оскар — они знают, кто реально заслужил поиграть. Дзен!!!

6🔥2

12 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC770 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎾 Падел ворвался в Москву так же, как когда-то стартапы в вашу ленту. Марина Амелченко, бывший фаундер FoodPlan и выпускница акселератора, теперь управляет самым центральным падел-клубом столицы - и в выпуске честно разложила, как устроен этот бизнес: стоимость корта, загрузка часов, окупаемость и допвыручка. Она объяснила, чем падел отличается от тенниса не только по правилам игры, но и по экономике: порог входа, м

👍102🔥2custom 54160154875259880072

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Kruche4aka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 18,875 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Круче Чака: Венчур 2026” (@Kruche4aka), 1,812 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kruche4aka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.