Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

8기통 풀악셀

@V8foreverz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

503subscribers

+45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003902275148
TypeChannel
Username@V8foreverz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 4 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/V8foreverz

Growth

458503480.56 August 2026 — 458 subscribers6 August 2026 — 458 subscribers13 August 2026 — 503 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 451–510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:17503+45
6 Aug 2026, 19:04458no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:50458first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
206.8%
avg views ÷ 503 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total20,805
Reactions total88
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3843.2%
👍2225.0%
😁2225.0%
👏22.27%
🤬22.27%
🤔11.14%
🤯11.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 03:41 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Leading_trader

🌐 통일부 "북한 아닌 '조선'으로 불러야" 『정동영 통일부 장관이 5일 북한 명칭을 '조선민주주의인민공화국'(조선)으로 부르는 방안을 추진하겠다고 밝혔다. 정 장관은 이날 청와대에서 열린 통일부 업무보고에서 남북이 서로의 공식 국호를 사용하는 '서로 이름 부르기' 정책을 추진하겠다고 말했다. 정 장관은 "(북한을) 조선이라고 부르는 것이 통일 포기라는 일각의 주장은 전적으로 사실관계 오인"이라며 "상대방의 이름을 불러주는 존중이 신뢰를 만들고 이를 통해 평화 공존으로 나아가는 첫걸음이 될 것"이라고 주장했다.』 → 왜 이런 인간이 대한민국 국민인가. 💬 만약, 이재명 대통령이 정동영의 이런 사상과 정책이 부적절하다고 판단했다면 진작 경질했겠지. 그대로 두고 있다는 것은 이 모든 것이 임명권자의 의지라는 것임. #정동영 #통일부장

🤬2

6 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC84 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Yeouido_Lab

서킷 먹다보니 사이드카는 조금 낫긴한데... https://n.news.naver.com/article/009/0005717371

6 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC126 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @asrd124gq24gadsgq24gqadcbv

https://damoang.net/free/6920238

6 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC96 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @daegurrFile

↘️↘️ 샌디스크 어닝콜 요약 오늘 어닝 후 좋은 실적에도 급락한 이유 ① FY27 비트 성장 가이던스 — 명시적 하향 기존에 계속 제시해 온 수치는 "10%대 중반~후반(mid-to-high teens)"이었는데, 이번 콜에서 루이스가 "2027년에는 조금 더 낮아질 것 → 10%대 중반(mid-teens)"으로 낮췄습니다. 사유는 NBM 납기 보장을 위한 재고일수 상향 운영 — 재고를 쌓으면서 판매 가능한 비트가 줄어드는 구조입니다. 생산능력 하향이 아니라 판매물량 하향이라는 점 ② FQ1 GM 가이던스 — 실적 대비 하락 제시 실적 84.6% 대비 가이던스는 83~85%(중간값 84%)로, CFO 스스로 "이번 분기 제시치 대비 소폭 하락(slightly down)"이라고 인정했습니다. 다만 이건 기존 가이던스의 하향은 아닙니다 —

6 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC111 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hogniel

http://www.paxetv.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=278760

5 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC112 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pcstfu

미국, 이란 관련 제재 해제 (재무부 웹사이트) 원문: U.S. REMOVES IRAN-RELATED SANCTIONS -TREASURY WEBSITE [...](https://x.com/DeItaone/status/2085004175088271742) 출처: @marketfeed 번역제공: Deepseek AI

5 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC155 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mootda

진짜 공안정국이 되어부렀노 ㅋㅋㅋ https://n.news.naver.com/article/021/0002809054?sid=102

5 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC118 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @fourgachi

Solidigm이 10-K·10-Q·8-K·Registration Statement 등 SEC 공시를 총괄하는 Director급 인력을 채용 중. IPO·증권등록·회사채 발행 등 Capital Markets 경험자를 우대해, 미국 상장사 수준의 공시·회계 인프라 구축 정황이 강함. IPO 확정 신호는 아니지만, 최근 NAND/SSD 사업의 Solidigm 통합과 맞물려 향후 IPO 또는 독립 자금조달 준비 가능성을 시사함.

5 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈9,670 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

두산에너빌리티가 이번에 중국 부품수주 받은 이유가 중국 벨류체인이 풀캐파로 돌아가서 받을 수 있었습니다. 아마 미국도 곧 따라갈 것입니다.

3

5 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC168 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @chinastockrestaurant8

[원자력 부문 급등, 창푸 주가 10% 이상 상승] 오후에는 원자력 부문이 이례적으로 상승세를 보였으며, 창푸 주가는 10% 이상 상승했다. 롱파 원자력, 구성전기, 중국국가원자력건설, 장쑤 선통, 라이치 인텔리전트 제조, 헤쭌 인텔리전트가 급등했다. 뉴스 소식으로는, 2026년 7월 31일 국무원 집행회의에서 랴오닝의 장허 1단계 원자력 발전 프로젝트 4개를 승인하기로 결정했으며, 총 8기의 신규 유닛과 총 투자 규모는 1,700억 위안을 초과할 것으로 예상된다. 이는 2026년에 승인된 첫 번째 원자력 발전 프로젝트 배치이며, 제15차 5개년 계획 기간 동안 진행됩니다.

5 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC207 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mootdaPhoto

애플 : 깎아줘 창신 : 껒여

5 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC224 viewsread 6 August 2026

📌 두산퓨얼셀(시가총액: 1조 9,583억) #A336260 📁 단일판매ㆍ공급계약체결 2026.08.05 13:31:06 (현재가 : 29,900원, +4.55%) 계약상대 : Reverion GmbH 계약내용 : ( 기타 판매ㆍ공급계약 ) SOFC 연료전지 Stack 공급 계약 공급지역 : 독일 계약금액 : 1,087억 계약시작 : 2026-08-04 계약종료 : 2027-12-31 계약기간 : 1년 5개월 매출대비 : 23.9% 기간감안 : 17.07% 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260805800294 회사정보: https://finance.naver.com/item/main.nhn?code=336260

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @V8foreverz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 886,910 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“8기통 풀악셀” (@V8foreverz), 503 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/V8foreverz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.